Philisca ingens Berland
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3443.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5256238 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F31587CF-A624-7971-FF6E-1C8800B1FF20 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Philisca ingens Berland |
status |
|
Philisca ingens Berland View in CoL
Figs 10–12 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 , 34g View FIGURE 34
Philisca ingens Berland, 1924: 436 View in CoL (female holotype, from Chile, Juan Fernandez Archipelago, Más a Tierra, 22.VIII.1917, K. Bäckström coll., in NRS, S.P.E. 817, and female paratype in MHNP, examined). Ramírez 2003: 178.
Diagnosis: Philisca ingens has a huge size compared to other Philisca species ( Figs 10 View FIGURE 10 , 11 View FIGURE 11 ), with a carapace longer than 6mm. The other large species of the genus, P. doilu , has a distinct notch on the posterior margin of the carapace ( Fig. 7b View FIGURE 7 ). Males are further distinguished by the very small copulatory bulb, widely separated from the tibia ( Fig. 12b View FIGURE 12 ).
Description. Female (from Chile, Juan Fernandez Islands, Más a Tierra, Valle Anson, Plazoleta de Yunque, 200–250m Camote side, 1–28.IV.1962, B. Malkin, in AMNH): Total length 12.77. Prosoma length 6.65, width 4.79, wider between legs II–III. Tibia/metatarsus length: I, 5.13/4.67; II, 4.33/4.13; III, 3.27/3.60; IV, 4.53/5.20. Chelicerae with three teeth on promargin (middle tooth larger), three on retromargin. Sternum length 3.20, width 2.47. Spines: leg I, femur d 1–1–1, p d2ap or d1ap; tibia v 2–p1–2; metatarsus v 2bas. II, femur d 1–1–1, p d2ap; tibia v 2–2–r1–2; metatarsus v 2bas. III, femur d 1–1–1, p and r d1ap; patella r d1; tibia v 2–2–2, p d1–1, r 1–1 or 1–0; metatarsus v 2–2–2, d 2ap, p d1–1–1 and r d1–1–1 or d1–0–1. IV, femur d 1–1–1, p and r d1ap; patella r d1; tibia v 2–2–2, p d1–1 and r d1–d1–1; metatarsus v 2–2–2, d 0–p1–2 or 1–p1–2, p and r d1–1–1. Color in ethanol as male, see below ( Fig. 6d View FIGURE 6 ). Opisthosoma length 5.32, epigastrium–spiracle 2.40, spiracle–spinnerets 0.80. Epigyne large, not much translucent ( Fig. 6e, f View FIGURE 6 ), ventrally a single plate with anterior notch, LL separated in dorsal view. MF smooth, heart-shaped, close to the epigastric furrow. Anterior pouch wide, with short lumen. Ducts of AB long. Spermathecae large ( Fig. 6f View FIGURE 6 ). The holotype presented the following differences in spines: II, femur p d1ap; tibia v 2–2–2, p 0–1; metatarsus v p1–0. III, tibia d r1–0–1–0; metatarsus d 0–p1–2.
Male (MACN-Ar 27955): Total length 12.90. Prosoma length 6.38, width 4.66. Length of tibia/metatarsus: I, 6.65/6.38; II, 5.99/5.85; III, 4.79/3.46; IV, 5.99/6.38. Chelicerae have clear modifications ( Fig. 34g View FIGURE 34 ) with three teeth (middle tooth larger) on promargin, three on retromargin. Endites with protuberance at each external angle. Sternum length 3.00, width 2.33. Spines: leg I, femur d 1–1–1, p d2ap; tibia v 2–2–2; metatarsus v 2bas. II, femur d 1–1–1, p d1ap; tibia v 2–2–2; metatarsus v 2bas, p 1–0. III, femur d 1–1–1, p and r d1ap; patella r d1; tibia v 2– 2–2, p d1–1, r d1–1–1; metatarsus v 2–2–2, d 0–p1–2, p and r d1–1–1. IV, femur d 1–1–1, p and r d1ap; patella r d1; tibia v 2–2–2, p d1–1, r d1–d1–0–1; metatarsus v 2–2–2, d 0–p1–2, p and r d1–1–1. Opisthosoma length 6.12, spiracle–epigastrium 3.13, spiracle–spinnerets 1.00. Color in ethanol ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ): Prosoma, chelicerae and mouthparts reddish brown, darker in front. Sternum and legs reddish–yellow, speckled black on the underside and at the base of some spines. Abdomen yellow, reddish speckled in black. Tibia width/length 0.17. Embolus thin, cylindrical, base of embolus with anterior longitudinal projecting ridge. MA long, flattened, without branches, thinner on its ventral margin ( Fig. 12h View FIGURE 12 ). PMA long, wide, triangular, pPMA simple. Sclerotized triangular area present from the sperm duct to the base of MA. Conductor conspicuous, with canal weakly developed, ending in peak, on rounded projection, directed backwards ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ).
Variability: Spines in males: I, tibia p 0–1. II, tibia p 0–1. IV, femur p and r d2ap; metatarsus v 2–p1–2. Spines in female: I, tibia v 2–2–2. II, femur p d2ap; tibia p 0–1.
Distribution: Known only from the Juan Fernandez Archipelago, Isla Robinson Crusoe, Chile.
Other material examined: CHILE: Región V (Valparaíso): Archip. Juan Fernández, Is. Robinson Crusoe, área de Plazoleta El Yunque, S33.65276º W78.84403º (GPS, trayecto +- 25m), elev. 299m (barómetro), 16– 20.II.2011, bosque de luma, M. Ramírez, E. Soto, J. Pizarro , 1 male ( MACN-Ar 27955 ) GoogleMaps , 1 female and 2 immatures ( MACN-Ar 27954 ) GoogleMaps , 1 female ( MACN-Ar 28032 ) ; El Yunque square, 200–500m Camote side, 1–28.IV.1962, 1 female and 1 immature, B. Malkin ( AMNH; temporary preparations, female: EMS-00121, EMS-00145) ; sendero al Mirador Selkirk, S33.63803° W78.84838° (GPS, +- 10m), elev. 367m (barómetro), 18.II.2011, ambiente alterado, maqui y mora, M. Ramírez, E. Soto, J. Pizarro, 1 male ( MACN-Ar 27956 ) GoogleMaps ; Sector Salsipuedes, S33.63087° W78.84386° (GPS, área +- 100m), elev. 482m (barómetro), 21.II.2011, bosque de canelo, maqui y luma, M. Ramírez, E. Soto, J. Pizarro , 3 immatures ( MACN-Ar 28391 ) GoogleMaps .
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Philisca ingens Berland
Soto, Eduardo M. & Ramírez, Martín J. 2012 |
Philisca ingens
Ramirez, M. J. 2003: 178 |
Berland, L. 1924: 436 |