Pericoma speciosa Meunier, 1905
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4927.4.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:77145FDD-2036-4794-8336-9735F017E1BE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4543055 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FB87F5-FFAE-FB42-FF08-FC947D188928 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pericoma speciosa Meunier, 1905 |
status |
|
Pericoma speciosa Meunier, 1905 View in CoL
Pericoma speciosa Meunier, 1905, p. 244 View in CoL .
Diagnosis. Species known only from Eocene Baltic amber. Male with the following combination of character states: head capsule with antennal scape and pedicel globular, flagellomeres fusiform ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 ); wing profile ovate, with bluntly pointed apex ( Figs. 25–26; 28 View FIGURE 25 View FIGURES 26–28 ).
Description. Male. Eyebridge comprised of three facet rows; labellum bulbous, conspicuous; palp with segments cylindrical, nondescript; scapus globular, slightly larger than pedicel; pedicel globular; flagellomeres uniform in shape, fusiform, twice as long as wide; ascoids not visible in specimen; Thorax without remarkable characters; legs approximately equal in length, with proportions of femora, tibiae and tarsi of fore-, mid- and hindleg roughly equal; wing with C nearly twice as thick compared to longitudinal veins; radial fork placed slightly apical to medial fork. Terminalia with gonostylus straight, slightly inflated at base, evenly tapered from inflated part to apex; surstyli moderately elongate, slightly curved dorsally, inflated at base, without noticeable tapering from base to apex; cluster of more than 10 tenacula inserted dorsoapically.
Type material. A male specimen originally examined by Meunier (1905) numbered Z2726 ( GZG.BST-06177) is here designated as lectotype .
Other material examined. See Table 1 View TABLE 1 and the corresponding folio in Morphobank: http://morphobank.org/ permalink/?F897. An additional female specimen, probably congeneric with P. speciosa , is placed in a separate folio in Morphobank: http://morphobank.org/permalink/?F907
Comments. Generic classification of this species is currently inadequate, as it is not Pericoma , but also can not be confidently assigned to another genus or described as new. Few specimens are available for study and the lectotype male shows only a lateral view of the genitalia. Unfortunately, a second male specimen (MZ17325) with ovate wings and fusiform antennal flagellomeres agreeing to P. speciosa can only be tenusouly identified as such. The eye bridge is obscured and genitalia is visible in partial dorsoventral view. Additional specimens of this type are needed to clarify the genus and species-level taxonomy.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pericoma speciosa Meunier, 1905
Curler, Gregory R. & Skibińska, Kornelia 2021 |
Pericoma speciosa
Meunier 1905: 244 |