Penthicodes caja caja ( Walker, 1851 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.196336 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6207587 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B67C87A6-0D2D-C233-FF1B-94F3FEE0F847 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Penthicodes caja caja ( Walker, 1851 ) |
status |
|
Penthicodes caja caja ( Walker, 1851) View in CoL
Figs. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 A–E, 25.
Diagnostic characters: (1) tegmina with white patch along sutural margin and along costal margin on nodal line of cross-veins ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 A); (2) legs I and II dark brown with pale yellow rings ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 E); (3) dark-brown to black-brown markings of tegmina large and irregular, also on membrane, ground colour of membrane paler ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 A); (4) disc of hind wings orange with base red, and with 4 (3–6) black spots, one elongate black line near base and 1–4 small white spots ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 A); (5) abdominal tergites black medially ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 A).
LT: ɞ (n = 1): 28.0 mm; Ψ (n = 3): 30.9 mm (30.1 – 32.0). Wingspan: Ψ (n = 3): 56.7 mm (55.4 – 57.5).
Note: the species is easy to recognize by the large, irregular, dark brown markings of the tegmina, and the subspecies is easily recognized by the disc of hind wings orange with base red.
Distribution ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 ): Bengladesh, India (N), Laos *, Myanmar *, Thailand, Vietnam (* = new data).
Typical material examined: Bengladesh: photo of the holotype Ψ labeled: [Silhet – on the reverse – 46 48] [Type] [Holo-type] ( BMNH) coordinates of Silhet (= Sylhet): 24°53'N 91°52'E.
Notes: the original description refers to a male specimen but Walker and other authors very often confused males and females in Fulgoridae and other Fulgoromorphs, e.g. Eurybrachidae .
1 Ψ labeled [Silhet] [Stevens] [ caja W. (B.M.)] [Typus] [497 58] [383 61] [Riksmuseum Stockholm] [NHRS-HEMI 000000032] ( NHRS) has also been examined. This sspecimen is not regarded as typical because the original description refers to one specimen from Mr. Stainforth collection while this specimen is from Mr. Stevens’ collection.
Material examined: 2 Ψ: no data ( MHNL). Myanmar: 2 Ψ: Dawna, vi.1992 ( MHNL) coordinates: 16°50'N 98°15'E; Laos: 1 Ψ: Phong Saly (= Phôngsali), viii.1920, R. Vitalis de Salvaza ( RBINS) coordinates: 21°41'N 102°06'E; 1 ɞ: idem, v.1920 ( FSAG). Thailand: 2 Ψ: Thailand (GGC); 2 Ψ: Chiang Mai, iv1992, M. Donskoff ( MNHN) coordinates: 18°47'N 98°59'E. India: 1 ɞ, 1 Ψ: Sikkim, Elwes ( FSAG) coordinates: 27°45'N 88°30'E; 1 ɞ, 2 Ψ: Sikkim ( NHRS).
Note: 1 Ψ erroneously labeled from N Celebes, ex coll. E.P. VanDuzee ( CAS) has also been examined.
Additional data: Vietnam: 1 ɞ: Vinh Phuc province, Tam Dao National Park, vi.2000, alt 1000m, H.T. Pham (IEBR) coordinates: 21°29'N 105°38'E.
Data compliled by A. Wessel and S. Seidel: India: 1 ɞ: Darjeeling, det. V. Lallemand (ZMHB) 2 ex.: Sikkim (SMTD).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |