Paratus hamatus, Mu & Zhang, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:89E9D685-74AF-4AFC-B3FB-E2C782A38E08 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5986506 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A066E809-FFE0-2B46-FF0D-FE7B1EEB0068 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Paratus hamatus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Paratus hamatus View in CoL sp. n.
Figs 1–4 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4
Type material. Holotype ♂, CHINA: Yunnan Province: Baoshan City, Tengchong County, Gaoligong Mountains National Nature Reserve (25°16.944'N, 98°43.017'E), 2494 m a.s.l., 20 Oct 2015, Tian Lu leg. GoogleMaps Paratypes: 3♀, same data as the holotype GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The species name is an adjective and refers to both the RTA and embolus of the male palp that are hook-shaped.
Diagnosis. The male palp is similar to that of P. sinensis in lacking a conductor, but can be distinguished by: 1) the long, curved, hook-shaped RTA (vs straight), 2) embolus strongly curved, hook-shaped, and with a thin apex (vs slightly curved with a broad apex). The epigyne is similar to that of P. perus Sankaran, Malamel, Joseph & Sebastian, 2017 by having a ‘W’-shaped plate, but can be distinguished by: 1) copulatory ducts short, V-shaped (vs long); 2) spermathecae separated (vs adjoining); 3) copulatory openings hidden under epigynal plate (vs not hidden).
Description. Male ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Holotype: total length 3.58, carapace 1.60 long, 1.52 wide, abdomen 1.98 long, 1.42 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.09, ALE 0.08, PME 0.10, PLE 0.10, AME–AME 0.10, AME–ALE 0.08, PME–PME 0.11, PME–PLE 0.15, ALE–PLE contiguous. Clypeus height 0.06, about 0.67 times of AME diameter. Several bent setae originated at the base of fang. Carapace bright yellow, with two pairs of brown bands laterally. Highest point of carapace at fovea. Fovea red-brown, long and straight. Cervical groove indistinct, radial groove distinct. Sternum light yellow, with grey pattern submarginally. Chelicerae darker than carapace, 2 promarginal and 4 retromarginal teeth. Abdomen grey, with distinct black patches and irregular white guanine spots. Leg measurements: leg I 6.61 (1.88, 0.65, 2.02, 1.46, 0.60), leg II 6.23 (1.81, 0.46, 1.91, 1.48, 0.57), leg III 5.21 (1.63, 0.49, 1.29, 1.20, 0.60), leg IV 5.81 (1.75, 0.50, 1.34, 1.52, 0.70). Legs coloured as carapace, femora III and IV with two distinct black annuli that divide femora into three almost equal parts. Tibiae I and II with 7 pairs of long ventral spines, metatarsi I and II with 3 pairs of long ventral spines.
Palp ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 A–C, 4A–C) as illustrated. Femur (0.79) nearly as long as cymbium (0.78). Patella (0.39) slightly longer than tibia (0.29). Tibia with one prolateral spine, RTA long, curved, hook-shaped. Tegulum rounded, semilucent, with triangular membranous tegular apophysis. Embolus originating at centre of bulb, strongly curved, hook-shaped.
Female ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Total length 3.58–4.03 (n=3). One female with total length 3.58 measured: carapace 1.63 long, 1.95 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.12, ALE 0.09, PME 0.11, PLE 0.12, AME–AME 0.06, AME–ALE 0.07, PME–PME 0.10, PME–PLE 0.14. Clypeus very low, 0.04, about 0.33 times of AME. Leg measurements: leg I 5.23 (1.48, 0.61, 1.58, 1.04, 0.52), leg II 5.12 (1.51, 0.58, 1.40, 1.11, 0.52), leg III 5.40 (1.56, 0.59, 1.33, 1.30, 0.62), leg IV 5.92 (1.62, 0.56, 1.41, 1.63, 0.70). Other characters as for male except the darker colour and slightly larger body size.
Epigyne ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 D–E, 4D–E) as illustrated. Epigynal plate weakly sclerotized, with ‘W’-shaped posterior margin, without wrinkles. Copulatory openings hidden under epigynal plate. Copulatory ducts short, V-shaped. Spermathecae spherical, diverging, separated by about 2 times spermatheca diameter. Fertilization ducts curved upward, longer than radius of spermatheca.
Distribution: Known only from the type locality.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |