Paraclausocaris harpa, Laville & Forel & Charbonnier, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.898.2295 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:87EE2C76-1DDC-40DE-87E7-4D0E11A312DC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8421988 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4F007D44-251E-496D-818B-9C3065947B0D |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:4F007D44-251E-496D-818B-9C3065947B0D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Paraclausocaris harpa |
status |
gen. et sp. nov. |
Paraclausocaris harpa gen. et sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4F007D44-251E-496D-818B-9C3065947B0D
Figs 5A View Fig , 13–15 View Fig View Fig View Fig
Clausia sp. – Secrétan & Riou 1983: 85–86, pl. 4 figs 2, 17.
Clausia ribeti – Secrétan 1985: 388, fig. 5j.
Clausocaris ribeti – Polz 1989: 73. — Charbonnier 2009: 158, fig. 250. — Charbonnier et al. 2010: 118, fig. 5d; 2014: 375, fig. 5c.
Dollocaris ingens – Charbonnier et al. 2010: 113, fig. 3e.
Diagnosis
Same as for Paraclausocaris .
Etymology
Referring to the shape of the shield, which is similar to the shape of a harp.
Material examined
Holotype FRANCE • La Boissine, La Voulte-sur-Rhône, Ardèche; Callovian, Middle Jurassic; MNHN.F.A 29295 .
Paratypes FRANCE • 22 specs; same collection data as for holotype; MNHN.F. A29148 , A29149 , A29264 , A29267 A29295 , A29323 , A29327 , A29345 , A29348 , A29353 , A29356 , A29358 , A29360 , A53341 , A83986 to A83990 , A84072 , R50955 , R50974 .
Measurements
See Table 2 View Table 2 .
Description
Shield morphology
Cone-shaped shield in lateral view with an anterior margin formed by a symmetric and concave optic notch in its ventral part and with a convex dorsal part, a sharp antero-dorsal corner, a slightly convex dorsal midline with small serrations in the last two thirds of the midline and ending in a sharp postero-dorsal corner ( Figs 13A, C, H View Fig , 14G–H View Fig ); straight posterior margin antero-ventrally oriented, ending in a rounded postero-ventral corner; ventral margin divided in a concave posterior part steeply descending antero-ventrally and in a horizontal anterior part slightly rising to the antero-ventral corner. Rims of all free margins forming a marginal fold.
Shield macro-ornamentation
Small sinuous ridges covering the entire dorsal area of the shield ( Fig. 13F View Fig ). Central part of the shield adorned with a straight dorso-lateral carina ( Fig. 14A–B View Fig ). Shield forming a hump near the antero-ventral corner ( Fig. 14A–B View Fig ). Thin ventro-lateral groove delimiting the marginal fold. Four rounded, canal-like pores visible in the posterior part of the shield, above the pleural part of trunk segments ( Fig. 13F–G View Fig ). Pores forming a rim surrounding a hollow part.
Sensory structures
Two stalked, circular compound eyes protruding from the optic notch and occupying most of the anterior margin ( Fig. 14A–B View Fig ). Eyes consisting of 136 hexagonal ommatidia per mm² (w = ~73 µm; h = ~130 µm; Figs 13E View Fig , 14E View Fig , 15H View Fig ).
Cephalic appendages
One elongate, antenniform structure (~ 15 mm) lying in the anterior part of the body ( Figs 13A, C View Fig , 14C–D View Fig ).
Raptorial appendages
Three pairs of long and slender raptorial appendages recognised by the preservation of muscles,
protruding from the ventral margin, posterior to the presumed cephalic appendages. Raptorial appendages consisting of two parts: a proximal postero-ventrally oriented and a distal one, antero-ventrally oriented.
Articulation between both parts forming an elbow.
First pair of raptorial appendages ( Figs 13H–I View Fig , 15F–G View Fig ), the shortest, consisting of a proximal part with two podomeres: podomere 1 being 3.4 times as long as wide; podomere 2 being 4.6 times as long as wide and longer than podomere 1. Distal part of the appendages formed by three podomeres: podomeres 3 being 4.3 times as long as wide; podomere 4 being 3.3 times as long as wide; podomere 5, the most distal one, being 3 times as long as wide, ending in a cluster of three long spines.
Second pair of raptorial appendages consisting of a proximal part with two podomeres: podomere 1 being 3.4 times as long as wide, podomere 2 being 6.2 times as long as wide ( Figs 14A–B View Fig , 15F, I View Fig ). Distal part of the appendage consisting of three podomeres: podomere 3 being 4.7 times as long as wide; podomere 4 being 5.5 times as long as wide; podomere 5, being 3.2 times as long as wide and ending distally in a cluster of three long spines.
Third pair of raptorial appendages, the longest, consists of a proximal part formed by two podomeres: podomere 1 being 3.6 times as long as wide; podomere 2, the longest of the appendages, being 6 times as long as wide ( Fig. 15A, F–G View Fig ). Distal part consisting of three podomeres: podomere 3 being 4.4 times as long as wide; podomere 4 being 5.7 times as long as wide and bearing three long spines on its medial end; podomere 5 being 3.3 times as long as wide and ending with a cluster of three long spines.
Oval structure
Long oval structure, protruding from the anterior part of the ventral margin, posterior to raptorial appendages ( Figs 13H–I View Fig , 15A, C, G–H View Fig ).
Posterior trunk
Posterior trunk consists of nine rectangular segments, slightly tilted anteriorly. Segments consisting of a dorsal square-shaped structure (i.e., tergal part of the segments), surrounded on their lateral sides by nine elongate rectangular structures (i.e., pleural part; Fig. 15G–H, J View Fig ), slightly curved downward at their distal end ( Fig. 15A, D View Fig ). Segments increasing in height towards the penultimate segment. Most posterior segment shorter than the previous one.
Posterior trunk ending posteriorly in a rhomboidal element (i.e., telson), bearing a circular structure formed by two circular parts ( Fig. 14A–D View Fig ): an outer one, delimiting the entire feature, and an inner smaller one.
Posterior trunk appendages
Nine pairs of posterior trunk appendages protruding from the posterior part of the ventral margin ( Fig. 13A–D View Fig ). First appendage formed by two parts: a square-shaped dorsal one (i.e., endopod) and a ventral oval one (i.e., exopod). Trunk appendages 2–8 consist of at least two elements: a square-shaped proximal one and a rectangular distal one. Last pairs of trunk appendages being much longer than the rest ( Fig. 14F–G View Fig ). No square-shaped element discernible.
Gills
Eight lamellar gills preserved under the central part of the shield below the lateral carina ( Fig. 14A–B View Fig ). Gills arcuate with an elliptic shape.
Anterior muscles
Bundle of radially arranged muscles preserved in the antero-medial part of the shield, above the antero-ventral hump ( Fig. 13A, C View Fig ).
Remarks
Some specimens previously assigned to Clausocaris ribeti (now Ostenocaris ribeti comb. nov.) are now ascribed to Paraclausocaris harpa gen. et sp. nov. (e.g., MNHN.F.A29149; Fig. 13H–I View Fig ; Charbonnier et al. 2010). Indeed, they differ from the type material (and thus from Ostenocaris ) by their well-developed optic notch, their serrated dorsal margin, their concave posterior part of the ventral margin and their elongate raptorial appendages relative to the shield size.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Paraclausocaris harpa
Laville, Thomas, Forel, Marie-Béatrice & Charbonnier, Sylvain 2023 |
Dollocaris ingens
Charbonnier S. & Vannier J. & Hantzpergue P. & Gaillard C. 2010: 113 |
Clausocaris ribeti
Charbonnier S. & Vannier J. & Hantzpergue P. & Gaillard C. 2010: 118 |
Charbonnier S. 2009: 158 |
Polz H. 1989: 73 |
Clausia ribeti
Secretan S. 1985: 388 |
Clausia sp.
Secretan S. & Riou B. 1983: 85 |