Oides bivittata Gahan, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4346.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:688F9A37-C1B5-4FBC-9CAC-90DE1D81E410 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6028954 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B820AC1F-FFA9-FFFC-3DA0-FF5D0DC842B7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Oides bivittata Gahan |
status |
incertae sedis |
Oides bivittata Gahan , incertae sedis
( Figs 71A–71C View FIGURE71 )
Oides bivittata Gahan, 1891: 453 ( Indonesia: Sulawesi?); Weise, 1924: 2 (catalogue, New Guinea); Wilcox, 1971: 5 (catalogue).
Types. Lectotype ♀ (BMNH), here designated, labeled: “ Celebes [h, w] // Baly Coll. [p, w] // Oides / bivittata / Type Gahan [h, w] // SYN- / TYPE [p, w, circle label with blue border] // Type [p, w, circle label with red border]”. Paralectotype. 1♀ (BMNH): “ Celebes [h, w] // Baly Coll. [p, w] // Oides / bivitattum / Baly / N. Guinea [h, w] // SYN- / TYPE [p, w, circle label with blue border] // vidit III-1 975. [h] / A. VACHON—det. [p, w]”
Remarks. Although both types were collected from the Celebes [Sulawesi] based on handwritten labels, Gahan (1891) doubted the locality and suspected that the specimens originated from the Aru islands instead. The identity of this species remains uncertain since both types are females.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Oides bivittata Gahan
Lee, Chi-Feng & Beenen, Ron 2017 |
Oides bivittata
Wilcox, J. A. 1971: 5 |
Weise, J. 1924: 2 |
Gahan, C. J. 1891: 453 |