Nativus tupana, Casas & Rheims, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5360.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C97810F4-A6EB-4040-8DC4-0BBCD687E9AF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10247319 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/736DED1E-1A78-C927-5594-8A8A88F2E3FD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nativus tupana |
status |
sp. nov. |
Nativus tupana sp. nov.
Figs 1−10 View FIGURES 1–6 View FIGURES 7–10 , 112−126 View FIGURES 112–116 View FIGURES 117–120 View FIGURES 121–126
Type material. Holotype: BRAZIL: Amazonas : ♂, Manaus, Reserva de Campina [-2.4000, -59.8667], 31 January 1994, T. Gasnier leg. ( IBSP 43567 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: BRAZIL: Amazonas: 1♀, same data as for holotype ( IBSP 43567 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Borba, Rio Mapiá [-4.3833, -59.5833], 22 April 1996, Equipe IBSP / SMNK leg. ( IBSP 8824 View Materials ); GoogleMaps 3 ♂, 7 ♀, 1 juv., same data as previous specimen ( IBSP 8831 View Materials , IBSP 8828 View Materials ); 3 ♂ 3 ♀, Rio Preto da Eva [-2.6983, -59.6977], 7−26 January 2015, E. C. Galvão leg. ( IBSP 279452 View Materials , IBSP 279459 View Materials , IBSP 279462 View Materials , IBSP 279470 View Materials , IBSP 279461 View Materials , IBSP 279480 View Materials ); GoogleMaps 2 ♀, same locality as for previous specimens, January 2016, E.C. Galvão leg. ( IBSP 257691 View Materials , IBSP 257697 View Materials ); GoogleMaps 1♀, Manaus , Fazenda Dimona, BR 174 ( ZF3 ) [-2.3330, -60.0640], 16 May 2006, F.B. Baccaro et al. leg. ( INPA 5907 View Materials ); GoogleMaps 1♀, Manaus , Reserva Colosso, Reservas do PDBFF [-2.4000, -59.8667], 28 February 2002, F.N.N. Rego leg. ( IBSP 97273 View Materials ); GoogleMaps 1♀, Manaus , Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke [-2.9000, -60.0833], 1995, C. Martius leg. ( IBSP 14517 View Materials ); GoogleMaps 1♂, same locality as for previous specimen, 2000, E.P. Fagundes leg. ( IBSP 245997 View Materials ); GoogleMaps 1♀, Presidente Figueiredo , Usina Hidrelétrica de Balbina, Ilha Abusado (-1.7616, -59.6784), 25−27 June 2016, D. Storck-Tonon leg. ( IBSP 231172 View Materials ); GoogleMaps 1♂, same locality as previous specimen (-1.5586, -59.8497), 3−5 July 2016, D. Storck-Tonon leg. ( IBSP 231278 View Materials ); GoogleMaps 1♂, same locality as for previous specimem, Ilha Beco do Catitu , 26−28 June 2016, D. Storck-Tonon leg. ( IBSP 250186 View Materials ) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific name refers to Tupana, mother of thunder, revered by the early Indian inhabitants of the region of Borba, before the arrival of the Portuguese Jesuits; noun in apposition.
Diagnosis. Males of N. tupana sp. nov. resemble those of N. hazzii sp. nov. ( Figs 28−30 View FIGURES 28–33 ), N. juruti sp. nov. ( Figs 47−49 View FIGURES 47–49 ) and N. nocaima sp. nov. ( Figs 91−93 View FIGURES 91–96 ) by the palps with tegulum bearing small, wider than long RdP and E sinuous. They are distinguished from the three latter species by the presence of a large median projection on the DTA ( Figs 121−122 View FIGURES 121–126 ) (DTA without median projection in the other species). Females resemble those of N. nocaima sp. nov. ( Figs 94−96 View FIGURES 91–96 ) by the epigyne with LL in roughly an inverted T-shape, with pair of elongate COd situated anteriorly. It is distinguished from the latter species by the by the COd J-shaped and separated from each other by almost MS width ( Fig. 124 View FIGURES 121–126 ) (C-shaped and separated from each other by half MS width in the latter species).
Description. Male (IBSP 8828, paratype): Prosoma brown with darker brown margins and thoracic striae; cephalic region with darker brown stripes extending posteriorly from PME and between AME; fovea dark brown; eye borders black. Chelicerae, legs and palps pale brown. Endites pale orange brown, distally lighter. Labium brown, distally orange brown. Sternum pale yellow with dark orange margins. Opisthosoma pale gray; dorsally with two pairs of brown, rounded muscle impressions; ventrally with faint dark gray longitudinal band and two roughly parallel lines of muscle impressions. Spinnerets pale yellow ( Figs 112−113 View FIGURES 112–116 ). Total length 6.1. Prosoma: 3.0 long, 2.9 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.0 long, 1.8 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.22, 0.26, 0.20, 0.28; interdistances: 0.06, 0.02, 0.24, 0.22, 0.20, 0.20. Legs (2143): I: 19.7 (4.9, 1.4, 5.5, 5.4, 2.5); II: 23.2 (5.6, 1.5, 6.7, 6.6, 2.8); III: 15.5 (4.1, 1.2, 4.0, 4.6, 1.6); IV: 18.7 (4.9, 1.2, 4.8, 5.5, 2.3). Palp: PTA roughly squared, distally rounded, as wide as long; VTA reduced, absent; vRTA two times longer than wide; dRTA with two pointed branches, the dorsal one two times longer than ventral one; tegulum with RdP roughly 1.5 times wider than long; bp subsquared, as wide as long ( Figs 114−116 View FIGURES 112–116 , 121−123 View FIGURES 121–126 ).
Female (IBSP 8828, paratype): Coloration pattern as in male except prosoma, with brown reticulated pattern laterally and brown marks between thoracic striae ( Figs 117−118 View FIGURES 117–120 ). Total length 6.7. Prosoma: 2.6 long, 2.7 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.8 long, 2.4 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.21, 0.27, 0.20, 0.30; interdistances: 0.10, 0.03, 0.26, 0.28, 0.27, 0.24. Epigyne: EF slightly wider than long; LL fused; pair of elongate COd situated anteriorly bearing posterior CO; MS situated posteriorly to fused part of LL, trapezoidal, almost three times wider than long ( Figs 119 View FIGURES 117–120 , 124 View FIGURES 121–126 ). Vulva: CD with first winding laterad; encapsulated part of internal ducts two times longer than wide, slightly more dilated posteriorly; FD antero-laterad ( Figs 120 View FIGURES 117–120 , 125−126 View FIGURES 121–126 ).
Variation. Males (n = 9): Total length 5.6−6.7; prosoma length 2.5−3.3; femur I length 4.6−4.9. Females (n = 10): Total length 5.5−7.8; prosoma length 2.5−3.2; femur I length 3.1−3.8.
Distribution. Known from the state of Amazonas, Brazil ( Fig. 143 View FIGURE 143 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |