Mulsanteus linteatus linteatus ( Candèze, 1873 ), linteatus (Candeze, 1873
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15560/14.4.681 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A087DC-751A-FFCE-FF05-FD13FDA3FB16 |
|
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
|
scientific name |
Mulsanteus linteatus linteatus ( Candèze, 1873 ) |
| status |
|
Mulsanteus linteatus linteatus ( Candèze, 1873)
Ludis linteatus Candèze 1873: 28 .
Neotrichophorus linteatus linteatus ; Ôhira 1998a: 24.
Mulsanteus linteatus linteatus ; Kishii 1999: 81.
Ludius ligatus Candèze 1891: 190 .
Neotrichophorus aureopilosus yamamotoi Nakane and Kishii 1955b: 44 .
Material examined. 1♂, Site 3, looking [18A052] ( Fig. 4C).
Species diagnosis. Ôhira (1998a).
Bionomics. The specimen examined was found on a leaf of grass in open land near a forest.
Podeonius aquilus ryukyuensis ( Ôhira, 1968) Anchastus aquilus ryukyuensis Ôhira 1968: 134 . Akitsu aquilus ryukyuensis ; Kishii 1999: 72. Podeonius aquilus ryukyuensis ; Ôhira 2003b: 20.
Materialexamined. 3♂, 1♀,Site2,SLT[18A053–18A056] ( Fig. 4D); 3♂, 1♀, Site 11, SLT [18A057–18A060].
Species diagnosis. Ôhira (1996b).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Mulsanteus linteatus linteatus ( Candèze, 1873 )
| Arimoto, Kôichi & Itô, Reo 2018 |
Mulsanteus linteatus linteatus
| Kishii T 1999: 81 |
Neotrichophorus linteatus linteatus
| Ohira H 1998: 24 |
Podeonius aquilus ryukyuensis ( Ôhira, 1968 )
| Ohira H 2003: 20 |
| Kishii T 1999: 72 |
| Ohira H 1968: 134 |
Neotrichophorus aureopilosus yamamotoi
| Nakane T & Kishii T 1955: 44 |
Ludius ligatus Candèze 1891: 190
| Candeze ECA 1891: 190 |
linteatus Candèze 1873: 28
| Candeze ECA 1873: 28 |