Melithaea philippinensis ( Wright & Studer, 1889 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5236.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:796FF9F5-E71F-4C69-92CC-CF4D6752BD77 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7639384 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0388B641-7B08-FFB2-FF56-FE97FC91FC6F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Melithaea philippinensis ( Wright & Studer, 1889 ) |
status |
|
Melithaea philippinensis ( Wright & Studer, 1889) View in CoL
Melitodes philippinensis Wright & Studer, 1889: 176–177 View in CoL , pl. 40, figs. 10, 10A, 10B ( Philippines).
Opinion: There is no evidence that this species occurs in the region.
Justification:
These Indian records seem to be either invalid or unconfirmable: Thomson & Simpson, 1909: 172–173, pl. 5, figs. 2&4; pl. 9, fig. 12 (Andamans).
Literature analysis: Originally named Melitodes philippinensis , the description given by Wright & Studer (1889) is too inadequate to be able to identify the species they had, and the same can be said of the account by Thomson & Simpson (1909). Additionally, it is virtually impossible to find any common features when comparing the sclerite figures in these two publications. Rao & Devi (2003) and Kumar et al. (2019) just listed the species as occurring in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands with absolutely no evidence. In the paper by Kumar et al, “ Acabaria phiippinenesis (Wright & Studer) ” is given as the only synonym.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Melithaea philippinensis ( Wright & Studer, 1889 )
Ramvilas, Ghosh, Alderslade, Philip & Ranjeet, Kutty 2023 |
Melitodes philippinensis
Wright E. & Studer, T. 1889: 177 |