Megaselia quasirufifrons Disney, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3161/00034541ANZ2020.70.1.004 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3795760 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EB2287CD-A212-FF96-FF6B-09B56705FD31 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Megaselia quasirufifrons Disney |
status |
sp. nov. |
Megaselia quasirufifrons Disney View in CoL , sp. nov.
( Figs 44–53 View Figures 44–53 )
Description. (Male). In the key to the males of the species of Megaselia recorded from the British Isles ( Disney 1989) it runs to couplet 183 lead 1 M. rufifrons (Wood). It closely resembles this species. Both species are unusual in that the upper supra-antennal bristles are wider apart then the pre-ocellars ( Figs 44 View Figures 44–53 & 54 View Figures 54–61 ). M. rufifrons has pale postpedicels ( Fig. 55 View Figures 54–61 ) and an orange brown thorax and is a little larger. Thus its wing ( Fig. 61 View Figures 54–61 ) is 1.4 mm long and costal index 0.4, and hind femur 0.60 mm long and 0.18 mm maximum breadth. That this is not a case of variation within a species is indicated by fine details of the hypopygium. Thus the bristles at the tip of the anal tube’s proctiger are clearly longer than those of the cerci, but in M. rufifrons they are clearly shorter and weaker ( Figs 47 & 49 View Figures 44–53 ). By contrast the hypandrial bristles of M. rufifrons are longer and more robust ( Fig. 57 View Figures 54–61 ) than those of the new species. In addition the labella of the proboscis have numerous small spinules below ( Fig. 46 View Figures 44–53 ), unlike M. rufifrons ( Fig. 56 View Figures 54–61 ). The front tarsi ( Fig. 59 View Figures 54–61 ) and hind femur ( Fig. 60 View Figures 54–61 ) of M. rufifrons are similar. The species fails to key out in the rest of the world’s literature and subsequent additions, with the widely spaced upper supra-antennal bristles ruling out otherwise similar species.
Male. Frons as Fig. 44 View Figures 44–53 , with dense but very fine microtrichia and upper supra-antennal bristles further apart than pre-ocellars. Cheek with 2 bristles and jowl with 2 that are longer and more robust. Postpedicels, without SPS vesicles, palps and proboscis as Fig. 45 View Figures 44–53 . The labella with numerous small spinules below ( Fig. 46 View Figures 44–53 ). Thorax brown, with 2 notopleural bristles and no cleft in front of these. Mesopleuron bare. Scutellum with an anterior pair of small hairs and a posterior pair of bristles. Abdominal tergites brown with small hairs that are longer at rear of T6 ( Fig. 47 View Figures 44–53 ). Venter gray. Hypopygium as Figs 47–50 View Figures 44–53 . Legs yellowish brown to pale yellow. Fore tarsus ( Fig. 51 View Figures 44–53 ) with posterodorsal hair palisade on segments 1–4 and 5 longer than 4. Dorsal hair palisade of mid tibia extends about 0.6 times its length. Hairs below basal half of hind femur clearly longer (at 0.08 mm long) than those of anteroventral row of outer half (at 0.04 mm long) ( Fig. 52 View Figures 44–53 ). Hind tibia with 8–9 moderately differentiated posterodorsal hairs, without anterodorsals, and spinules of apical combs simple. Wings ( Fig. 53 View Figures 44–53 ) 1.07–1.10 mm long. Costal index 0.36–0.37. Costal ratios 3.4–4.8: 1.1–1.3: 1. Costal cilia (of section 3) 0.06–0.07 mm long. Vein 3 hair 0.04 mm long. 2 unequal axillary bristles, the outermost being 0.07–0.08 mm long. Sc not reaching R1. Haltere brown.
Type material. Holotype male, Poland, Wigry National Park , in emergence trap in plot 5 with Impatients parviflora DC, IX. 2017, E. Durska leg. ( MIZ PAS, – 28-60) . Paratype male as holotype except ( UCMZ, – 28-61).
Etymology. Named after its close resemblance (quasi) to M. rufifrons (Wood) .
PAS |
Java Sugar Experimental Station |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.