Megalothrips rotundus Guo, Cao & Feng, 2010
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5696.4.3 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A209E493-7223-47BE-B611-ACE1176762A4 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17415852 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03879A36-FF96-FFB9-1F90-F889D4DFFD48 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Megalothrips rotundus Guo, Cao & Feng |
| status |
|
Megalothrips rotundus Guo, Cao & Feng
Megalothrips rotundus Guo et al., 2010: 733–735 .
M. rotundus was described from Hubei Province, China, based on 3 females, but we have not examined these. Moreover, unfortunately, the original description may be incomplete with some incomprehensible substances, and the specific definition of rotundus could not be understood satisfactorily. According to the original description, head is very long as ‘3.26 times as long as width of eyes (this may be width across eyes)’ and almost as long as tube, but the text figure of the head seems to be not so long, at least shorter than 3.0 times. Usually, congeners have the head 2.0–2.5 times as long as broad, and shorter than the tube in females. There is a possibility that the head length in this description included mouth-cone length. Similarly, antennal segment III is 10.2 times as long as wide in the description but is not so long in the text figure. This may be due to simple measurement error, because the width of antennal segment III in the measurements is much narrower than other segments. Fortunately, however, the notopleural suture of rotundus is clearly drawing, and the noto-epimeral suture is almost completely lost, but the noto-episternal suture remains fully.
There are at least two more undetermined Megalothrips species, apart from the new species described below, collected from Indonesia, Borneo, Vietnam and Taiwan in the collection of TUA; all of these have complete noto-episternal suture and all are known only from females. Unfortunately, however, the morphological information of M. rotundus , which is undoubtedly related to these specimens, is poor, and it is impossible to discriminate them at species level at present.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Megalothrips rotundus Guo, Cao & Feng
| Okajima, Shûji & Masumoto, Masami 2025 |
Megalothrips rotundus
| Guo, F. Z. & Cao, S. J. & Feng, J. N. 2010: 735 |
