Ibotyporanga atikum Huber, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.963.2687 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA331360-A678-4233-A7CC-7308EF8B6D7E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14013640 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B16F11B4-492F-4487-A28D-20E8AF0A8BAA |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:B16F11B4-492F-4487-A28D-20E8AF0A8BAA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ibotyporanga atikum Huber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ibotyporanga atikum Huber sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B16F11B4-492F-4487-A28D-20E8AF0A8BAA
Figs 23C View Fig , 96 View Fig , 109–112 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig
Diagnosis
Distinguished from similar congeners (with split procursus with long dorsal branch; long male palpal patella, i.e., dorsally>1.8× as long as medially wide; and sclerite in female internal genitalia) by combination of: procursus main branch and dorsal branch proximally overlapping, i.e., without space between them in lateral view ( Fig. 110C View Fig ); male palpal tarsus with very low dorsal hump (arrow in Fig. 110C View Fig ); embolus with distinctive dorsal apophysis (arrow in Fig. 110E View Fig ); and median sclerite in female internal genitalia very simple, almost rectangular ( Fig. 112C–D View Fig ). Distinguished from the very similar I. payaya sp. nov. also by main procursus branch in dorsal view narrower (compare Figs 102B View Fig and 110B View Fig ), shorter cheliceral apophysis (compare Figs 103B View Fig and 111B View Fig ), and epigynal pocket more curved and distinct (compare Figs 103C View Fig and 111C View Fig ).
Etymology
The species name honors the Atikum, an indigenous people of Brazil that lives in Bahia and Pernambuco; noun in apposition.
Type material
Holotype
BRAZIL – Bahia • ♂; SE of Bom Jesus da Lapa, ‘site 2’; 13.4383° S, 43.1645° W; 480 m a.s.l.; 18 Nov. 2022; B.A. Huber and L.S. Carvalho leg.; CHNUFPI 5960 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes
BRAZIL – Bahia • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 5961 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 9048 [deposited in ZFMK Ar 24379] GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 5962 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 1.7, carapace width 0.73. Distance PME–PME 45 µm; diameter PME 70 µm; distance PME–ALE 25 µm; distance AME–AME 20 µm; diameter AME 35 µm. Leg 1: 4.03 (1.07+0.27 +1.03 +1.23 + 0.43), tibia 2: 0.83, tibia 3: 0.77, tibia 4: 1.20; tibia 1 L/d: 11; diameters of leg femora 0.17; of leg tibiae 0.09–0.10.
COLOUR (in ethanol). Prosoma and legs ochre-yellow, carapace medially with darker Y-mark and posterior narrow band, leg femora and tibiae subdistally slightly darkened; abdomen gray with many darker internal marks; ventrally with light ochre plates in front of gonopore and in front of spinnerets.
BODY. Habitus as in I. ouro sp. nov. (cf. Fig. 73G View Fig ). Ocular area slightly raised. Carapace with distinct but shallow thoracic groove. Clypeus with sclerotized rim with median notch. Sternum wider than long (0.52/0.42), with very low and indistinct anterior processes near coxae 1 not different from those in female. Abdomen globular.
CHELICERAE. As in Fig. 111A–B View Fig ; width 0.29; with relatively short median frontal apophysis; stridulatory files very fine and poorly visible in dissecting microscope.
PALPS. As in Fig. 109 View Fig ; coxa unmodified; trochanter with short ventral process; femur proximally with distinct retrolateral process directed toward distal, with prolateral stridulatory pick, distally widened but unmodified; femur-patella joints not shifted toward one side; patella dorsally ~2.0 × as long as medially wide; tibia with two trichobothria in relatively proximal position; tibia-tarsus joints barely shifted toward retrolateral side; tarsus with very low dorsal hump (arrow in Fig. 110C View Fig ); procursus ( Fig. 110A–C View Fig ) with long dorsal branch distally curved towards prolateral, main branch with light prolateral band, subdistal short side-branch, distally slender and transparent; genital bulb ( Fig. 110D–F View Fig ) with narrow prolateral sclerite on bulbous part, embolus with distinctive dorsal sclerite.
LEGS. Without spines but with longer hairs ventrally on femora; without curved hairs; with short vertical hairs on tibia 1; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 60%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with ~3–4 pseudosegments, only distally distinct.
Variation (male)
Tibia 1 in second male: 1.18; dark rings on legs slightly more distinct in second male.
Female
In general, similar to male but clypeus unmodified, tibia 1 with few vertical hairs. Tibia 1 in three females: 1.07, 1.17, 1.23. Epigynum ( Fig. 112A View Fig ) anterior plate roughly semi-circular, posterior margin weakly indented, with distinct and strongly curved anterior pocket; posterior plate large but simple. Internal genitalia ( Figs 111C View Fig , 112B–D View Fig ) with pair of oval pore plates posteriorly, strongly sclerotized median structure, and very thin-walled large anterior expandable membranous sac.
Distribution
Known from type locality only, in Brazil, Bahia ( Fig. 96A View Fig ).
Natural history
The spiders were collected in the leaf litter of degraded roadside vegetation, among low shrubs and grasses. On the neighboring granite outcrop, we found a different species of Ibotyporanga , I. payaya sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |