Hygropoda tangana ( Roewer, 1955 ) Cruz Da Silva, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3710.3.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2B90952A-49D0-49E6-9E13-301B1EDC5420 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FD63705C-FFAA-BA32-FF44-A0F7084FF889 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hygropoda tangana ( Roewer, 1955 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Hygropoda tangana ( Roewer, 1955) View in CoL new combination
Figs 1–20 View FIGURES 1–6 View FIGURES 7–9 View FIGURES 10–13 View FIGURES 14–19 View FIGURE 20
Cispius tanganus Roewer 1955: 238 , figs 88b, 90a–c, male holotype from Tanga, Tanzania, East Africa GoogleMaps [05º03'S, 39º06'E], (SMF 10546, examined).
Note. The male holotype of Cispius tanganus was compared to specimens from Madagascar available at CAS. The combination of characters of the male palpus (developed embolus, membranous distal apophysis and median apophysis) with the excavated middle field of the female epigynum and shape of the head of the spermathecae observed in the females, the presence of long and flexible tarsi (character exclusively found in Hygropoda Thorell, 1894 View in CoL and Megadolomedes Davies & Raven, 1980 View in CoL ) and the fact that males and females were found together in several Madagascar samples, justifies the transfer of C. tanganus from Cispius View in CoL to Hygropoda View in CoL .
Diagnosis. The males of H. tangana comb. nov. resemble those of H. higenaga (Kishida, 1936) by the short membranous distal tegular apophysis ( Zhang et al., 2004, fig. 83), but can be distinguished by the distal finger-like ventral projection on the tegulum (VTP, figs 8, 12, 13) and by the large and heavily sclerotized embolus (E) ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 7–9 , 10, 11 View FIGURES 10–13 ). Females resemble those of H. higenaga by the presence of two lateral excavations on the middle field ( Zhang et al., 2004, fig. 80), but can be distinguished by the deep median excavations ( Figs 9 View FIGURES 7–9 , 14, 15 View FIGURES 14–19 ) and by the acute median posterior projection surrounded by the lateral lobes ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 14–19 ).
Description. Male (holotype). Total length 6.05. Carapace 2.07 long, 1.55 wide, yellow, unmarked ( Figs 1, 2 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Clypeus yellow, scattered setae, 0.10 high ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Anterior eye row straight (front view) 0.54 wide ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ),; posterior recurved, 0.76 wide ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.08, ALE 0.10, PME 0.12, PLE 0.10; AME-AME 0.06, AME-ALE 0.06, PME-PME 0.17, PME-PLE 0.14, OQA 0.26, OQP 0.40, OQH 0.30. Chelicerae light brown, scattered bristles ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Sternum yellow, glabrous, light brown laterally ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ); 1.12 long, 0.94 wide. Labium yellow, 0.32 long, 0.34 wide ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Legs yellow with long dark brown macrosetae ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ), relative length: I-II-IV-III, I— femur 7.31/ tibia-patella 9.04/ metatarsus 9.31/ tarsus 3.70/ total 29.36; II—5.39/ 6.22/ 5.81/ 2.15/ 19.57; III—3.07/ 2.98/ 3.32/ 1.16/ 10.53; IV—5.14/ 5.22/ 5.47/ 2.32/ 18.15. Ventral pairs of macrosetae on tibiae: I-5; II-4; III-3; IV-3. Hood of trichobothria smooth ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 14–19 ). Superior tarsal claw with 17 teeth, inferior with one tooth ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 14–19 ). Abdomen 4.15 long, yellow, unmarked ( Figs 1, 2 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Venter light yellow, glabrous ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Palpus with a hook-like and curved median apophysis ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 7–9 , 10, 11 View FIGURES 10–13 ). Distal apophysis tegular membranous ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 7–9 , 11 View FIGURES 10–13 ). Ventral tegular projection finger shaped ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 7–9 , 10, 11 View FIGURES 10–13 ). Embolus slender and heavily sclerotized ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 7–9 , 10, 11 View FIGURES 10–13 ). Retrolateral tibial apophysis slender and elongated ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 7–9 , 12, 13 View FIGURES 10–13 ).
Female (Fianarantsoa Province, Madagascar, CAS 9008954). Total length 7.30. Carapace 2.32 long, 1.82 wide, color as in male ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Clypeus as in male, 0.12 high. Anterior eye row straight, 0.56 wide; posterior recurved, 0.82 wide. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.09, ALE 0.08, PME 0.10, PLE 0.08; AME-AME 0.11, AME-ALE 0.08, PME- PME 0.20, PME-PLE 0.18, OQA 0.26, OQP 0.40, OQH 0.28. Chelicerae light brown, bristly; promargin with five teeth equidistant and equal in size; retromargin without teeth. Sternum as in male, scattered setae; 1.20 long, 1.05 wide. Labium dark brown, 0.34 long, 0.40 wide. Legs as in male, relative length: I-II-IV-III, I—femur 5.39/ tibia-patella 6.30/ metatarsus 5.37/ tarsus 2.45/ total 19.51; II—4.23/ 4.98/ 4.15/ 1.99/ 15.35; III—2.98/ 3.07/ 2.57/ 1.16/ 9.78; IV—4.73/ 4.64/ 4.06/ 1.74/ 15.17. Ventral pairs of macrosetae on tibiae: I-4; II-4; III-3; IV-3. Abdomen 5.14 long, color as in male ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Epigynum with copulatory plugs ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14–19 ). Middle field of epigynum with concave median excavations ( Figs 9 View FIGURES 7–9 , 14 View FIGURES 14–19 ). Elongated copulatory ducts ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 14–19 ). Head of spermathecae short ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 14–19 ) and with pores and with small finger-like projections ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 14–19 ).
Material examined. TANZANIA, Tanga: Lushoto District, Mazumbai Forest Reserve [04°29’S, 38°29’E], elevation 1650m, 1 ♂, 22.XI.1995, no collector data ( ZMUC) GoogleMaps , Muheza District, Kwamgumi Forest Reserve [04°57’S, 38°45’E], elevation 450m, 14 ♂, 6 ♀, 18? 20.VII.1995, no collector data ( ZMUC) GoogleMaps , Segoma Forest Reserve [04°59’S, 38°44’E], elevation 210m, 1 ♂, 1 ♀, 11.XI.1995, no collector data ( ZMUC) GoogleMaps ; Iringa: Mufindi District, Uzungwa Forest Reserve [08°31’S, 35°54’E], elevation 750m, 2 ♂, 12.III.1996, McKamey et al. ( ZMUC) GoogleMaps . KENYA, Kwale: Shimba Hills National Reserve, Makadara Forest [04°10’S, 39°27’E], elevation 400m, 3 ♂, 1 ♀, 08.VI.1975, A. J. Penniman & B. D. Valentine ( AMNH) GoogleMaps . SOUTH AFRICA, Eastern Cape: Mkhambath [31°17’S, 29°58’E], 1 ♀, 28.I.2008, no collector data ( NCA 6758 ) GoogleMaps . MADAGASCAR, Fianarantsoa Province: Forêt d’Analalava [22°35’S, 45°07’E], elevation 700m, 1 ♀, 01–05.II.2003, B. L. Fisher et al. ( CAS 9017406 About CAS ) GoogleMaps , 1 ♀, 01–05.II.2003, B. L. Fisher et al. ( CAS 9008954 About CAS ) ; Isalo National Park, Sahanafa River [22°18’S, 45°17’E], elevation 500m, 2 ♀, 10–13.II.2003, C. E. Griswold et al ( CAS 9017318 About CAS ) GoogleMaps , 1 ♂, 27–31.I.2003, B. L. Fisher et al. ( CAS 9017225 About CAS ) ; Toliara Province: Forêt Classée d’Analavelona [22°40’S, 44°11’E], 1100m, 1 ♀, 18–22.II.2003, B. L. Fisher et al. ( MCTP) GoogleMaps .
Distribution. Tanzania, South Africa (East Cape), Kenya, Madagascar (Fianarantsoa, Toliara) ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hygropoda tangana ( Roewer, 1955 )
Cruz Da Silva, Estevam L. 2013 |
Cispius tanganus
Roewer, C. F. 1955: 238 |