Gyrinus (Neogyrinus) guianus Ochs, 1935
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1515/aemnp-2017-0087 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EC4E5771-9B5E-4745-BB24-556963D657B7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5414964 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03959737-FFFF-2028-117D-8BB9FD766BE7 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Gyrinus (Neogyrinus) guianus Ochs, 1935 |
status |
|
Gyrinus (Neogyrinus) guianus Ochs, 1935
( Figs 4 View Figs 1–6 , 22–23 View Figs 22–24. 22–23 , 25–26 View Figs 25–28 , 31 View Figs 29–33 , 54 View Figs 51–59 , 70 View Figs 68–71 , 72 View Figs 72–75 , 76–77 View Figs 76–81 )
Gyrinus guianus Ochs, 1935b: 34 (original description). Gyrinus (Neogyrinus) guianus: OCHS (1935b) : 34 (new status). Gyrinus (Neogyrinus) amazonicus Ochs, 1958 (original description), syn. nov.
Type localities. Gyrinus guianus : ‘Britisch-Guiana, N.W. District’. Gyrinus amazonicus : ‘Lago Irucanga, Igarapé Sahida’ [Amazonas, Brazil].
Type material. Gyrinus guianus : HOLOTYPE: ♀, ( Fig. 77 View Figs 76–81 ) ‘ Type [white disc, red outline, typed black ink]’ ‘BR. GUIANA / North West District / March 1934 / F. A. Squire [white label, partially typed, partially handwritten, all in black ink]’ ‘ Pres. by / Imp.Inst.Ent. / B.M. 1935-40. [white label, typed black ink]’ ‘ Gyrinus / guianus / Ochs / Type! 1934 [handwritten in black ink, handwriting G. Ochs’] ’. PARATYPE ♀ pinned same as holotype except: ‘Co-type [white disc, yellow border, typed black ink]’ and without Och’s handwritten type label ( BMNH).
Gyrinus amazonicus : PARATYPES (2 spec.): J ( Fig. 76 View Figs 76–81 ), pointed with microvial ‘ BRAZIL: Amazonas / Igarapé Sahida / Lago Irucanga / 7.xi.1947. R.Braun. [white label, typed blacked ink]’ ‘Brit. Mus. / 1958-562 [white label, typed black ink, except 562 handwritten in black ink]’ ‘ Gyrinus / amazonicus / Para. Ochs / typen 1958 [white label, handwritten in blue ink, handwriting Ochs’]’ ( BMNH). J pointed, same as previous except ‘Igarapé Grande do Jurucui, 27.xi.1947 ’ ( BMNH).
Other material examined. VENEZUELA: AMAZONAS: ca. 7 km S. Samariapo , 5°10.900’N, 67°46.078’W, 95 m, 15.i.2009, leg. Short, Miller, García, Camacho, & Joly, roadside pond, VZ09-0115-02X, SM0846154 (1 spec. SEMC) GoogleMaps ; Puerto Ayacucho (29 km S) Rio Paris Chico , seined, leg. J.T.Polhemus, CL2372 (1 spec. USNM) ; same as previous except: 66 km N Rio Herera , i.25.1989, CL2385 (1 spec. USNM) ; nr Iboruwa, ‘ Tobogancito’ , 5°48.414’N, 67°26.313’W, 13.i.2009, leg. Short / Miller, VZ 09011302 (9 spec. KBMC) GoogleMaps ; Pond 7km S Samariapo, 5°10.900’N, 67°46.078’W, 15.i.2009, leg. Short / Miller,VZ09011502 (14 spec. KBMC) GoogleMaps ; riv.nr Orinoco / Sipapo confl., 5°03.707›N, 67°46.768›W, 15.i.2009, leg. Miller / Short, VZ 09011501 (32 spec. KBMC) ; riv nr Orinoco / Sipapo confl., 5°03.707’N, 67°46.768’W, 15.i.2009, leg. Short / Miller, VZ 09011504 (1 spec. KBMC) GoogleMaps ; Stream along Rio Sipapo , 4°55.849’N, 67°44.645’W, 16.i.2009, leg. Short / Miller, VZ09011602 (6 spec. KBMC) GoogleMaps ; sameas previous except 87 m, 16.i.2009, leg. Short, García, Camacho, Miller, & Joly, VZ 09-0116-02X, SM0845691 (1 spec. SEMC) ; San Carlos de Rio Negro , 24.i.1985, leg. P. & P. Spangler, R. Faitoute, W. Steiner (1 spec. USNM) .
Diagnosis. Body form ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1–6 ) narrowly oval, weakly convex in lateral view; pronotal lateral margins dark in color, elytral lateral margins often dark in color, other times red; elytral disc with mostly uniform reticulation, bronzy-metallic in appearance; striae VI–XI evident ( Fig. 22 View Figs 22–24. 22–23 ) with distinct linearpunctures ( Fig. 26 View Figs 25–28 ), striae VI–X sulcate ( Fig. 22 View Figs 22–24. 22–23 ); elytral intervals all evenly convex; elytra medially with medial pre-apical plica ( Fig. 23 View Figs 22–24. 22–23 ); elytral apex rounded ( Fig. 23 View Figs 22–24. 22–23 ), without border, epipleural indistinct; metanepisternal ostiole absent; aedeagus ( Fig. 31 View Figs 29–33 ) with median lobe shorter than parameres, narrow, apex strongly triangular; gonocoxae ( Fig. 54 View Figs 51–59 ) elongate, with rounded apices.
Gyrinus guianus is most similar to G. rozei and can primarily be distinguished by the diagnosis given under G. rozei . However, an additional feature unique to G. guianus that will aid in identifying this species is the medial pre-apical plica of the elytra ( Fig. 23 View Figs 22–24. 22–23 ). Among the Venezuela Neogyrinus species of Venezuela, only G. guianus exhibits this distinguishing elytral feature. The female gonocoxae also easily separate these two species, as G. guianus has more elongate gonocoxae with rounded apices ( Fig. 54 View Figs 51–59 ) compared to the shorter strongly emarginate gonocoxae of G. rozei ( Fig. 55 View Figs 51–59 ).
Redescription. Size. Female length = 4.0– 4.5 mm, width = 2.0– 2.5 mm; male length = 3.5–4.0 mm, width = 2 mm. Habitus. Body form narrowly oval, strongly attenuated anteriorly and posteriorly, widest point at midlength; in lateral view weakly dorsoventrally convex, greatest convexity posterior to scutellar region, evenly depressed anteriorly and posteriorly.
Coloration ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1–6 ). Dorsally, head, pronotum, elytra bronzy-green, lateral margins of pronotum similarly colored as remainder of pronotum, elytral margin often similarly colored as remainder of elytra, other times red; ventrally lightly colored, mouthparts, ventral surface of pedicel, hypomeron, elytral epipleuron, and legs light yellow, remainder of venter slightly darker yellow to orangish-yellow in color.
Sculpture and structure. Pronotum with narrow lateral margins. Elytra ( Fig. 22 View Figs 22–24. 22–23 ) with stria I–V weakly present, evident only as reticulate stripes ( Fig. 25 View Figs 25–28 ) with irregular, very weakly impressed punctures; striae VI–XI evident, striae VI anteriorly faintly evident anteriorly, posteriorly weakly sulcate with faint linear punctures; stria VII with linear punctures weakly impressed in humeral region, more well impressed and sulcate posteriorly; striae VIII–IX sulcate, linearpunctures ( Fig. 26 View Figs 25–28 ) similarlywell impressed in humeral region and posteriorly; stria Xsulcate only posteriorly; stria XI raised above lateral margin for entirety, lineate in humeral region, punctures distinct in small medial raised region, lineate again posteriorly. Elytral disc with mostly uniform reticulation composed of strongly impressed meshes with round sculpticells ( Fig. 26 View Figs 25–28 ), producing a bronzed appearance; all elytral intervals evenly convex. Elytra with distinct medial pre-apical plica ( Fig. 23 View Figs 22–24. 22–23 ); apices rounded ( Fig. 23 View Figs 22–24. 22–23 ); bor- der absent; epipleural angle indistinct, never with denticle. Metanepisternal ostiole absent. Ultimate abdominal tergite without strong acumination.
Male genitalia ( Fig. 32 View Figs 29–33 ). Aedeagus withmedianlobe narrow, shorter than parameres, weakly attenuated apically, parallel sided in apical 1 /3, apex strongly triangular, with lateral margins of apical 1/5 straight, bent at ca. 60 angle; parameres with apex narrowly rounded. Female genitalia ( Fig. 54 View Figs 51–59 ). Gonocoxae elongate, apices rounded, left gonocoxa less curved than right.
Variability. This species is variable in the development of the lateral margin of the elytra. Populations from Amazonas, Venezuela had the lateral margin of the elytra considerably narrower than those exhibited by more easterly populations such as the paratype specimens of G. amazonicus from Amazonas Brazil, or compared to that of the paratype of G. guianus , which have anoticeably broader elytrallateral margin. However, in general, the lateral margin of G. guianus is distinctly narrower than that of other species.
The degree of impression of the pre-apical medial plica of the elytra ( Fig. 23 View Figs 22–24. 22–23 ) was also noted to vary among specimens, even within a population, with it being quite distinct in most specimens, but less so in others. Despite this, the presence of the plica could still be made out even in specimens where the plica was very weakly impressed.
Habitat. In Venezuela, this species has been collected both in ponds and along rivers and streams ( Fig. 70 View Figs 68–71 ).
Distribution. This species was previously known from western Guyana and northwestern Brazil ( OCHS 1967a), and is now recorded from Venezuela. Within Venezuela this species is found in the Guiana Shield region ( Fig. 72 View Figs 72–75 ).
Discussion. Gyrinus guianus was originally described solely from female specimens from northwestern Guyana ( OCHS 1935b). In 1958 OCHS described G. amazonicus ( Fig. 68 View Figs 68–71 ) from the Amazonian region of northern Brazil and stated it to be most similar to G. guianus . OCHS (1958) suggested his new species could be distinguished from G. guianus by having a different habitus, being wider and less parallel-sided in appearance. However, after examining the holotype of G. guianus ( Fig. 77 View Figs 76–81 ), and comparing it to paratypes of G. amazonicus ( Fig. 76 View Figs 76–81 ), as well as a series of male andfemale specimens from Venezuela ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1–6 ), the two species are identical. Images of the male holotype in the SMF provided via C. Benetti to confirm this. Most tellingly, G. amazonicus ( Fig. 76 View Figs 76–81 ) clearly exhibits the distinct medial pre-apical plica diagnostic of G. guianus ( Figs 23 View Figs 22–24. 22–23 and 77 View Figs 76–81 ). The differences stated by OCHS (1958) to erect the G. amazonicus , represent very common variation between populations and even among the sexes as females tend to be more elongate than males.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Gyrinus (Neogyrinus) guianus Ochs, 1935
Gustafson, Grey T. & Short, Andrew E. Z. 2017 |
Gyrinus guianus Ochs, 1935b: 34
OCHS G. 1935: 34 |
OCHS G. 1935: 34 |