Gieysztoria reta, Adami & Damborenea, 2024

Adami, Mariana Laura & Damborenea, Cristina, 2024, A new species of Gieysztoria Ruebush & Hayes, 1939 (Platyhelminthes, Rhabdocoela, Dalyelliidae) from Argentina with comments on geographical distribution of the genus in the Neotropical region, Zoosystema 46 (28), pp. 723-732 : 725-730

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5252/zoosystema2024v46a28

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:10CCB38D-7D5B-47E3-865D-B220412F1BD3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14076947

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4822C132-297D-49A3-BC35-4D496B2481E2

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:4822C132-297D-49A3-BC35-4D496B2481E2

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Gieysztoria reta
status

sp. nov.

Gieysztoria reta n. sp.

( Figs 1-4 View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG )

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4822C132-297D-49A3-BC35-4D496B2481E2

TYPE LOCALITY. — Argentina, Buenos Aires Province, Reta.

TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype. Argentina • Reta , Buenos Aires Province, natural wetland close to a dune field; 38°54’06”S, 60°21’4”W; 16 m a.s.l.; 2.II.2019; Adami M. L. leg.; 125 Μm plankton net, whole mount in polyvinyl-lactophenol; MLP-He, 8020. GoogleMaps

Paratypes. Argentina • 8 whole mounts in polyvinyl-lactophenol; same data as for holotype; Adami M. L. leg.; MLP-He, 8021 GoogleMaps .

OTHER MATERIAL. — Argentina • 2 specimens preserved in 100% ethanol; same data as for holotype; MLP-He, 8022 GoogleMaps .

ETYMOLOGY. — Name refers to the geographic area where the species lives.

DIAGNOSIS. — A small, complex stylet, 50-75 Μm long, with a proximal fenestrate fibrous girdle and distally with four sets of spines: 1) the largest, robust, ventral fang-shaped spine slightly curved toward the center and proximately grooved; 2) a shorter ventral fang-shaped spine; 3) a dorsal group of seven to eight fine spines arranged as bristles; and 4) a group of 12 to 13 dorsal hollow, broad-based spines of different lengths, arranged in three rows, forming a fan shape. Copulatory bursa with two cavities separated by incomplete septum. Uterus with a conspicuous bend.

DESCRIPTION

Living adult specimens up to 500 Μm long and 260 Μm wide ( Fig. 2A View FIG ); mature fixed adult specimens approximately 336 Μm to 600 Μm (n =11) long, and 175 Μm to 234 Μm (n =11) wide ( Fig. 2B View FIG ). Body oval, rounded at the anterior end and tapering towards the posterior end. Overall colour light brown with two pigmented black eyes (ey). Pharynx doliformis (ph): 135 Μm to 150 Μm long and 112 Μm to 150 Μm wide (n= 10), with prepharyngeal cavity (pp) ( Fig. 2A, B View FIG ).

Body wall musculature with an outer layer of circular muscles fibers (cm) and diagonal muscles fibers (dm). Inner longitudinal muscle fibers not observed in the stacks. Cellular epidermis about 5 Μm, with cilia (c) of approximately 6 Μm ( Fig. 3A, B View FIG ).

Male reproductive system, testes (t) ventro-lateral, paired, 75 Μm long in caudal half of the body. Testes and copulatory organ connected by vasa deferentia (vd) ( Figs 3C View FIG ; 4A View FIG ). Copulatory organ on the middle axis in three individuals, and on the right side of the body in other specimens. Seminal vesicle (sv) oval, 57 Μm long and 36 Μm wide, with muscular wall (svm), posteriorly connected with prostatic vesicle (pv) ( Figs 2B, C View FIG ; 3C, D View FIG ). Prostatic vesicle 29 Μm long and 18 Μm wide, with at least four accessory glands (ag) arranged as elongated sacs reaching the stylet girdle ( Figs 2C View FIG ; 3D View FIG ). Prostatic vesicle anterior to ejaculatory duct (ed) which runs inside the sclerotic stylet ( Fig. 3F View FIG ).

Stylet (st) about 50-75 Μm (n= 11) long, and 40-69 Μm (n= 11) wide. Proximal portion: fibrous girdle 40-60 Μm (n= 4) wide and 17-21 Μm (n= 4) long, with dorsal discontinuity about 18 Μm wide, and circular fenestra (f) traversed by few fibers ( Fig. 2D View FIG ). Distal portion with four different sets of spines of variable shape and size. Two large, single ventral spines (s1 and s2). S1, on the ventral side of stylet, the largest, robust fang-shaped spine, 27-38 Μm (n=5) long, slightly curved toward male genital atrium. Proximally fibrous and grooved, and distally inserted in a cavity (ic) connected with male atrium ( Figs 2D View FIG ; 3E View FIG ; 4A, B View FIG ). S2 shorter than s1, also ventral, 20 Μm long, fang-shaped, similar to s1( Figs 2D View FIG ; 4B View FIG ). Opposite to s1 and s2, there is a dorsal group of seven or eight fine spines arranged like the bristles of a paintbrush (s3) ( Figs 2D View FIG ; 4B View FIG ). Also dorsal, but on the opposite side, group of 12 or 13 hollow spines with broad bases arranged in three rows, forming a fan shape (s4) with variable length: shorter at both ends, and longer in the center of the fan, 13 and 26 Μm long, respectively ( Figs 2D View FIG ; 3C, D View FIG ; 4B View FIG ). Distal part of stylet anterior to male genital atrium (ma), which enters the common genital atrium (cga) ( Figs 3 View FIG C-E; 4A).

Female reproductive system, ovary single (ov), at least 60 Μm long, posterior and dorsal to the intestine, located on the left side ( Fig. 3B, C View FIG ). Vitellaria (vi) extended dorsally in the center region of the body ( Figs 2A, B View FIG ; 3B View FIG ). Vitelloduct, female duct and seminal receptacle not observed. Single yellowish shelled egg (e) about 160 Μm long (n= 8) carried in uterus ( Figs 2A, B View FIG ; 3B, C View FIG ). Uterine bend (ub) caudal to uterus. Large, globular, conspicuous, 50 Μm long and 30 Μm wide, associated by means of muscle fibers with copulatory bursa (cb) ( Fig. 3B View FIG ), opening into common genital atrium (cga) ( Fig. 3D, E View FIG ). Common genital atrium surrounded by circular muscle fibers (cma) and to a lesser extent by longitudinal muscle fibers (lma) continuous with muscle fibers of male genital atrium ( Figs 3C, D View FIG ; 4A View FIG ).

Copulatory bursa 57 Μm long and 34 Μm wide (n= 2), dorsal to common genital atrium, opening into it through a ductus. Bursa with two cavities (b1 and b2) separated by an incomplete septum (s). Content observed inside both cavities ( Figs 2B View FIG ; 3C, D View FIG ). Proximal cavity (b1) with muscular wall with strong circular fibers (cmb1) ( Figs 3B View FIG ; 4A View FIG ). Single thick muscular fiber extending from b1 wall (sfb1) to anterior end ( Figs 3C View FIG ; 4A View FIG ). Distal cavity (b2) with strong outer circular muscle fibers (cmb2) and fine inner longitudinal muscle fibers (lmb2) connecting with ductus communis ( Figs 3C, D View FIG ; 4A View FIG ).

Common gonopore (gp) ventral, with four circular muscle fibers forming a sphincter (scm) ( Figs 3E, F View FIG ; 4A View FIG ).

REMARKS

Regarding stylet morphology, Gieysztoria reta n. sp. has spines of different shapes and sizes and a circular opening (fenestra) in the girdle, so it belongs to the Inaqueales Group, subgroup Fenestratae ( Luther 1955).

Considering stylet morphology, G. reta n. sp. resembles its Brazilian congeners G. hermes Reyes & Brusa, 2021 , G. therapaina Marcus, 1946 , G. complicata (Fuhrmann, 1914) , and G. intricata Marcus, 1946 ; and Argentinian congener G. matilde Brusa, Damborenea & Noreña, 2008 , G. namuncurai Damborenea, Brusa & Noreña, 2007 , and Peruvian congener G. kasasapa Damborenea, Brusa & Noreña, 2005 ( Table 1 View TABLE ). The most similar stylet to that of G. reta n. sp. is that of G. hermes . However, the stylet is larger in Giesystoria reta n. sp. than in G. hermes (50-75 Μm and 34.2 Μm, respectively). Gieystoria reta n. sp. has four sets of spines (two single strong ventral spines, and two groups of dorsal spines), while G. hermes has three single ventral spines (the new species has one less ventral spine) ( Reyes et al. 2021: fig. 12C, blue). In G. reta n. sp., the two ventral spines seem not to be associated with the dorsal groups of spines, although Reyes et al. (2021) reported that in G. hermes , the two lateral ventral spines are associated with the dorsal groups of spines. Spine s 1 in the new species is larger than the largest fang-shaped spine in G. hermes ( Reyes et al. 2021: fig. 12C, red).

Like G. hermes , G. reta n. sp. has two groups of dorsal spines: a group of fine spines on one side, and a group of thicker hollow spines arranged in three rows on the other side. However, in G. reta n. sp., these three rows of spines are arranged forming a fan shape, while in G. hermes , this arrangement is not observed, and the number of rows of spines is not mentioned, though more than three rows are shown in the drawing of the holotype ( Reyes et al. 2021: fig. 12C). In G. hermes , the dorsal group of fine spines is arranged forming a comb-like structure in the stylet, whereas G. reta n. sp. has a single row of spines. Regarding the copulatory bursa, G. hermes has a single cavity with a thick wall, while G. reta n. sp. has two cavities with circular and longitudinal muscle fibers separated by an incomplete septum.

G. matilde and G. reta n. sp. have similar stylet lengths (54- 65 Μm and 50-75 Μm, respectively), but G. reta n. sp. has two ventral large spines, while G. matilde has a single large hollow blade-like spine. Like G. reta n. sp., G. matilde has two major groups of thin spines, one group with thicker spines than the other, though the original description does not specify their sizes. Gieystoria namuncurai and the new species share several stylet traits, but clear differences distinguish G. namumcurai from G. reta n. sp.: the lack of a circular opening (fenestra) in the girdle, a total stylet length of 100 Μm, and the presence of several rows of spines arranged in two groups, while in the new species there is only one group. Gieystoria kasasapa also shows differences from G. reta n. sp.: the stylet is larger in G. kasasapa than in G. reta n. sp. (75-85 Μm and 50-75 Μm, respectively). The Peruvian species has two groups of spines, both with less spines than the new species, and a single large hollow spine. Another species similar to G. reta n. sp. is G. therapaina , which has a stylet 33 Μm long, almost half the length of the stylet of the new species (50-75 Μm). Distally to the girdle, G. therapaina has four groups of spines ( Marcus 1946): three groups with several spines of different sizes and thicknesses, while the fourth group consists of a single large spine 20 Μm long, almost 2/3 of the total stylet size. Gieystoria reta n. sp. has two large ventral spines, and the largest spine is about half the length of the stylet.

Another species with similar stylet morphology to the new species is G. complicata , which has three groups of spines: one group with two strong parallel outward-curving spines (spines a), the second group with numerous spines in shape of a crown (spines b), and the third group with numerous spines arranged like a ‘brush’ (spines c), longer and broader than spines b ( Marcus 1946). However, in contrast to the new species, G. complicata does not have a fenestrated girdle, and the stylet is longer (100 Μm).

The stylet in G. reta n. sp. is also similar to the one in G. intricata , which has different sets of spines: single and clustered shorter spines, and a fenestrated girdle. However, it can be clearly distinguished from the new species because its stylet is longer (120 Μm) and has a single strong spine with cuticular hairs.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF