Esopus crassus A. Milne-Edwards, 1875

Guinot, Danièle & Bakel, Barry Van, 2020, Extraordinary majoid crabs: the genus Esopus A. Milne-Edwards, 1875 in the new subfamily Esopinae subfam. nov., and erection of Paulitinae subfam. nov. (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Majoidea, Inachoididae Dana, 1851), Zootaxa 4766 (1), pp. 101-127 : 105-110

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4766.1.5

publication LSID

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0E43BB66-03FD-443E-9D6E-1BEE52B0C459

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3803789

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/663987C6-FFAD-A606-B6F8-FF48FF24FC57

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Esopus crassus A. Milne-Edwards, 1875
status

 

Esopus crassus A. Milne-Edwards, 1875 View in CoL

Figs. 1 – 4 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4

Esopus crassus A. Milne-Edwards, 1875: 91 View in CoL , pl. 17, fig. 1–lc.—A. Milne-Edwards 1880: 2.—A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier 1923: 389.— Rathbun 1925: 192, pl. 222, figs. 10–12.— Chace 1940: 61, fig. 21A, B.— Ng et al. 2008: 100.— Carmona- Suárez & Poupin 2016: 384.— Poupin & Corbari 2016: fig. 15k.— Poupin 2018: 184, fig. 198.— Guinot 2019: 783, 787, figs. 19A, B, 20.

Type data. Holotype: Female 9.0 × 15.0 mm ( MCZ) [Curiously, although “the species is known by the unique type”, Rathbun (1925: 192) provided for the female holotype a significantly higher size, 13.0 × 8.4 mm, than that provided by A. Milne-Edwards (1875: 91), i.e. the above-mentioned measurements.

Type locality. Lesser Antilles of the West Indies, off the Barbados, Sandy Bay, 183 m, “Hassler” Expedition led by L. Agassiz in 1871–1872, from Cambridge to San Francisco, California, and around coasts of South America.

Material examined. One ovigerous female 11.0 × 6.7 mm, Guadeloupe, W Marie-Galante, KARUBENTHOS 2, st. DW4586, 15°59.62’N, 61°22.51’W, 251– 204 m, 21 June 2015, with some large eggs remaining from a recent egg-laying, MNHN-IU-2013-19002 ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 , 3 View FIGURE 3 ); one male 9.1 × 5.5 mm, Guadeloupe, W Marie-Galante, KARU- BENTHOS 2, stn DW4592, 15°58’N, 61°22’W, 201–214 m, 22 June 2015, MNHN-IU- 2016-2530; one male 9.1 × 5.4 mm, one female 11.3 × 6.9 mm, Guadeloupe, W Marie-Galante, KARUBENTHOS 2, stn DW4597, 15°56’N, 61°23’W, 208–210 m, 22 June 2015, MNHN-IU- 2016-2350; 2 ovigerous females 10.5 × 6.2 mm, 10.7 × 6,4 mm, Guadeloupe, S Marie-Galante, KARUBENTHOS 2, st. DW4637, 16°52’N, 61°20’W, 217-225 m, 28 June 2015, MNHN-IU- 2016-2562; 3 ovigerous females 10.7 × 6.6 mm, 10.7 × 6.4 mm, 10.4 × 6.3 mm, one female 10.5 × 6.3 mm, Guadeloupe, S Marie-Galante, KARUBENTHOS 2, st. DW4638, 15°50.29’N, 61°19.47’W, 312– 305 m, 28 June 2015, MNHN-IU-2013-19150; one male 10.8 × 6.9 mm (photographed Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ), MNHN-IU- 2019-2552; 2 males 10.5 × 6.4 mm, 10.4 × 6.6 mm, 6 females (3 ovigerous), 12.2 × 7.9 mm, 12.1 × 7.4 mm, 12.0 × 7,4 mm, 11.8 × 7.0 mm, 11.5 × 6,9 mm, 10.9 × 6.6 mm, Guadeloupe, S Marie-Galante, KARUBENTHOS 2, st. CP4624, 15°57’N, 61°32’W, 242–243 m, 26 June 2015, MNHN-IU-2016-8345; one female 10.5 × 6.3 mm, MNHN-IU- 2016-2571; one female 11.1 × 6.6 mm, Guadeloupe, S Marie-Galante, KARUBENTHOS 2, stn DW4645, 15°52’N, 61°20’W, 208–210 m, 29 June 2015, MNHN-IU- 2016-2631; one female 8.9 × 5.4 mm, Guadeloupe, E Desirade, KARUBEN- THOS 2, st. DW4560, 16°25’N, 60°52’W, 185–250 m, 16 June 2015, MNHN-IU- 2016-2061; one ovigerous female 11.1 × 6.8 mm, Guadeloupe, E Desirade, KARUBENTHOS 2, st. CP4569, 16°17.25’N, 61°01’W, 250–359 m, 17 June 2015, MNHN-IU-2013-18951 ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 , crab photographed on board).

Redescription Carapace narrow, much longer than wide, gibbous ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Cuticle very thick, hard. Lateral margins rounded, without spines. Dorsal surface as blistered, sculpted, with conspicuously inflated regions delineated by several deep, marked grooves, entirely covered by pronounced rounded granules; no spines; only some setae; four main distinct areas: frontal (tripartite, posteriorly limited by deep depression), gastric (elevated, divided in prominent regions: protogastric, mesogastric, metagastric, urogastric), cardiac (swollen), intestinal (flat). Cervical groove widely U-shaped, medially interruped. Cardiac region prominent; intestinal region large, flat; branchial region weakly subdivided. Dorsal surface and most part of ventral surface of body covered by rounded, almost confluent granules. Exposure of latero-external portions of pleurites 5–8 on same level as carapace, calcified and ornamented like dorsal carapace surface, forming wide collar all around posterolateral margins of pleural walls, and including wide and dorsal first (male and female) pleonal somite, similarly ‘integrated’ to carapace ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ). Portion in front of eyes delimited by deep transversal depression; interorbital space divided into three nearly equal lobes by two longitudinal depressions. Front broader than long, formed by large, rounded, tuberculiform prominence, with two tiny spines (hardly noticeable) on each side; folded ventrally. Rostrum wide, blunt in dorsal view, strongly deflexed, protruded downward as narrow, granulate beak-shaped plate (?proepistome) joining long and slender anterior process of epistome ( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 2B View FIGURE 2 , 3A View FIGURE 3 , 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Antennular fossae very narrow; antennules folded almost longitudinally in closed fossae. Antenna: article 1 (urinary) with rounded urinary orifice; basal article (articles 2+3) adjacent to article 1 coalescent with rostrum and epistome, very large, markedly prominent, extending well beyond eyes, without keel, covered with rounded granules; distal and disto-lateral portions visible dorsally; each basal article expanding medially on epistome by two large, rounded tubercles and thus close to the corresponding article of other side; following antennal articles proportionally very small in size; articles 4, 5 free; flagellum very short ( Figs. 3A View FIGURE 3 , 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Preorbital tooth absent. Ocular peduncle short, stout, folding into a fossa, i.e. incomplete orbit, formed by frontal edge and subhepatic region. Postorbital tooth thick, fused to rounded subhepatic region and cup-shaped to receive eye. Branchiostegite extremely reduced. Constriction of carapace marked ventrally, at level of epistome. Epistome rather small, recessed, forming posteriorly narrow raised wall, with straight margin. Buccal cavity wide. Milne-Edwards openings separated from chelipeds, large, entirely filled by developed mxp3 coxa ( Figs. 3A View FIGURE 3 , 4A, B View FIGURE 4 ). Mxp3 flat, completely covering buccal frame; merus slightly dilated outward and forward, slightly notched on inner side for insertion of palpus; crista dentata with small teeth and row of setae. Male chelipeds very long, narrow, usually more than twice as long as carapace; large gap between fingers, near base ( Chace 1940: fig. 21B). Female chelipeds shorter, less than length of carapace; fingers not gaping ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ); in females, fingers proportionally much shorter than palm compared to male fingers and palm. Ambulatory legs very slender, rather long, without any spines, with short setae; merus without spine(s) on dorsoproximal margin; dactyli very thin, long, not subchelate, applying along propodi; P2–P5 dactyli with longer setae. Female sterno-pleonal cavity deeply hollowed. Female pleon formed of four somites, somites 5–6 coalescent with pleotelson, swollen, forming large disc limited by high sternal ridge, and without spine or tooth ( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 2A View FIGURE 2 , 3B View FIGURE 3 ); pleonal somites 2, 3 and portion of 4 visible dorsally. Male pleons composed of five free somites plus pleotelson (somite 6 plus telson), first somites dorsally exposed ( Fig. 4A, B View FIGURE 4 ). Male thoracic sternum markedly wide, with strong granular ridges and depressions, continuing in smooth condition inside sterno-pleonal cavity; anterior shield inserted between mxp3 as broadly triangular, inflated plate, separated by depression from following sternites: sternites 1–3 fused without visible demarcation in males ( Fig. 4A, B View FIGURE 4 ) ( Chace 1940: fig. 21A), as small, narrow, seemingly undivided piece in front of sternal wall in ovigerous females ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ); suture 3/ 4 in depression; sternite 4 not inflated; sutures 4/5–7/8 interrupted, located in depressions, continuing on sides of sterno-pleonal cavity. Deep, small depression at base of sternite 8, instead of median line. Sternum/pterygostome junction complete thanks to curved anterior extensions of sternite 4. Wide sternal extensions joining exposed pleurites (sternum/pleurites connections) between P1/P2, P2/P3, P3/P4, and P4/P5 ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ). Female thoracic sternal sutures obliquely directed forward. Vulvae anteriorly displaced, with protruded openings on forward projected sternite 6, anteriorly to suture 4/5 ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ). G1 slightly curved, with broadened half proximal portion, ending in distal lobe with large aperture ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ); G2 very small. Ovigerous females with few large eggs.

Remarks. Esopus , which is monotypic, shares the synapomorphies that support the family Inachoididae , i.e. the typical inachoidid organisation, with the exposure of pleurites and pleon significantly increasing the surface area of the “carapace” and the edge of the true carapace in a setting gutter ( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 2A View FIGURE 2 ). But Esopus differs from other inachoidids by a unique combination of characters: body particularly thicker; dorsal surface strongly lobulated and grooved ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ); disposition of rostrum and proepistome; antennae ( Figs. 2C View FIGURE 2 , 3A View FIGURE 3 , 4A View FIGURE 4 ) (see also the excellent figure by A. Milne-Edwards 1875: pl. 17 fig. 1c; reproduced by Rathbun 1925: pl. 22, figs. 10–12); short eyestalk included in an incomplete orbit, posteriorly bordered by thick, curved, cup-shaped postorbital tooth fused to subhepatic region ( Fig. 2B, C View FIGURE 2 ); sternum/pterygostome junction complete, due to curved extension of sternite 4; Milne-Edwards openings separated from chelipeds, large, entirely filled by mxp3 coxa; thoracic sternum with thick granular ridges ( Fig. 4A, B View FIGURE 4 ) between the sutures; G1 with distal lobe ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ). These features are sufficient to introduce for the genus a new subfamily, Esopinae subfam. nov., within the Inachoididae whose characters we will briefly review below.

MCZ

USA, Massachusetts, Cambridge, Harvard University, Museum of Comparative Zoology

MCZ

Museum of Comparative Zoology

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

Family

Inachoididae

Genus

Esopus

Loc

Esopus crassus A. Milne-Edwards, 1875

Guinot, Danièle & Bakel, Barry Van 2020
2020
Loc

Esopus crassus

Poupin, J. 2018: 184
Poupin, J. & Corbari, L. 2016: 384
Ng, P. K. L. & Guinot, D. & Davie, P. J. 2008: 100
Chace, F. A. 1940: 61
Rathbun, M. J. 1925: 192
Milne-Edwards, A. & Bouvier, E. - L. 1923: 389
Milne-Edwards, A. 1880: 2
Poupin & Corbari 2016
Guinot 2019: 783
1880
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF