Austalis Thompson & Vockeroth
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.156531 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6277064 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87FF-FFD0-4D67-3835-FB39FDA28AF4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Austalis Thompson & Vockeroth |
status |
|
Austalis Thompson & Vockeroth View in CoL View at ENA , gen. nov.
Typespecies: Eristalis resolutus Walker
Head: face broadly pilose and pollinose laterally, usually shiny and bare medially, rarely entirely pollinose, straight except for medial tubercle and slight anterior production at antennal pits; tentorial pit short, extending along ventral third of eye; facial stripes indistinct; frontal prominence low, on dorsal third of head; eye bare, holoptic to broadly dichoptic in males; antenna short, about 1/4 as long as face; basoflagellomere oval, slightly longer than broad; arista variable, from bare to plumose.
Thorax: slightly longer than broad, with long pile; anterior anepisternum bare; katepisternum continuously pilose from ventral to dorsal margin; anepimeron with dorsomedial and posterior portions bare; without a postalar pile tuft; katepimeron pilose dorsally; metathoracic pleuron bare; metathoracic spiracle large, usually larger than basoflagellomere; plumula long and multibranched; scutellum without apical sulcus. Legs: simple; metafemur not swollen; metatibia without basal nor apical carina nor apical dens. Wing: usually partially microtrichose; cell R1 closed and petiolate; cell R4+5 petiolate, with petiole as long as stigmatic crossvein; stigmatic crossvein present.
Abdomen: oval to suboval.
Austalis is readily distinguished from all other eristaline syrphids by the pilosity of the pleuron ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 6. 1 4 ), having the unique combination of pilose posteroventral anepimeron along with pilose katepimeron. These flies are also typically bright metallic in coloration. Ferguson (1926: 153), while recognizing a broad definition for Eristalis , did recognize that the species with metallic coloration formed a distinct group. He, however, declared that pulchellus had "no very close relationship."
Little is known of the life histories of the species of Austalis . Our only source of information is what has been recorded on specimen labels and unfortunately there is not much beyond the standard locality, date and collector data. However, there is a series of specimens of a few species which were collected by H. Roberts as part of an ecological study of Geschis Seed Orchards in Papua New Guinea. His work indicated that the adults are not uncommon pollinators of Eucalyptus .
Etymology. The name Austalis is an arbitrary combination of letters created to be similar to Eristalis and the Australasian Region where the group occurs. The name is to be treated as feminine.
Eristalis View in CoL is a Latin noun of feminine gender ( Lewis & Short 1879: 657, Brown 1956: 339), however the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1993: 256) as well as various authors (Fabricius, Meigen, and others) treated the name as of masculine gender. As the Code (ICZN 1999: 34, see Art. 30.1.1) clearly states that genusgroup names based on Latin nouns take the gender accorded to them by Latin dictionaries (such as Harpers' (Lewis & Short 1879)), Eristalis View in CoL is feminine regardless of the Commission's own declaration.
Austalis View in CoL includes the following species, all of which represent new nomenclatural combinations: aequipars Walker View in CoL (1864: 210, Eristalis View in CoL ); bergi Curran View in CoL (1947: 12, Eristalis View in CoL ); caledonica Bigot View in CoL (1884: 339, Eristalomyia ); calliphoroides Shiraki View in CoL (1963: 165, Eristalis View in CoL ); ciliata Meijere View in CoL (1913: 355, Eristalis View in CoL ); conjuncta Ferguson View in CoL (1926: 155, Eristalis View in CoL ); copiosa Walker View in CoL (1852: 249, Eristalis View in CoL ); cupreoides Goot View in CoL (1964: 220, Eristalis View in CoL ); erythropyga Walker View in CoL (1864: 211, Eristalis View in CoL ); inscripta Doleschall View in CoL (1857: 407, Eristalis View in CoL ); latilimbata Meijere View in CoL (1913: 354, Eristalis View in CoL ); lucilioides Walker View in CoL (1861: 284, Eristalis View in CoL ); luciliomima Hull View in CoL (1944: 46, Eristalis View in CoL ); muscoides Walker View in CoL (1858: 96, Eristalis View in CoL ); muscomima Hull View in CoL (1944: 48, Eristalis View in CoL ); postscripta Walker View in CoL (1864: 210, Eristalis View in CoL ); pulchella Macquart View in CoL (1846: 255, Eristalis View in CoL ); refulgens Doleschall View in CoL (1858: 96, Eristalis View in CoL ); resoluta Walker View in CoL (1858: 95, Eristalis View in CoL ; = maritima Hull, 1945: 210 , Eristalis View in CoL , syn. nov.); rhynchops Bezzi View in CoL (1928: 80, Eristalis View in CoL ); roederi Bergroth View in CoL (1894: 72, Eristalis View in CoL ); smaradgi Walker (1849: 631, Eristalis View in CoL ); and triseriata Meijere View in CoL (1913: 353, Eristalis View in CoL ). In addition, another dozen species are known from the Oriental and Australian Regions and will be described in a subsequent revision of the genus (Thompson, in preparation).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Austalis Thompson & Vockeroth
Thompson, F. Christian 2003 |
maritima
Hull 1945: 210 |