Dyscophellus porsena Bell, 1934
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4532815 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E87A6-131E-A613-FF21-C5F675A4FE1E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dyscophellus porsena Bell, 1934 |
status |
|
Dyscophellus porsena Bell, 1934 View in CoL , reinstated status
( Fig. 69, 72 View Figure 62-73 , 103 View Figure 98-103 , 127 View Figure 125-130 )
Discophellus porsena Bell, 1934
Dyscophellus ramusis astrapaeus (Hewitson, 1876) View in CoL : Evans, 1952
The dorsal color of male D. porsena (mean FW length = 27.7 mm [26.7-29.0, n = 7]) in Rondônia varies from brown to red-brown. The macules on the ventral hindwing vary as do those of D. diaphorus . Male genitalia are as illustrated by Bell (1934).
The relationships of the taxa included by Evans (1952) and Mielke (2004, 2005) as subspecies (or synonyms) of Papilio ramusis , including Eudamus astrapaeus Hewitson, 1876 , Netrocoryne damias Plötz, 1882 , Discophellus porsena Bell, 1934 , and Dyscophellus ramusis ramon , need to be examined. The morphologies of the valvae of these taxa, as indicated by descriptions and figures ( Bell 1934, Hayward 1948, Evans 1952), show differences as great as those between unquestionably recognized species within Dyscophellus . Wing shape and colors differ ( Evans 1952) and both D. ramon and D. damias have been treated as full species (e.g., Bridges 1988, Warren 2000). Evans (1952) provisionally included D. porsena as a synonym of D. r. astrapaeus . This is incorrect since not only do the genitalia differ from that taxon, its color is different: “ochreous brown” ( Evans 1952) for D. r. astrapaeus and “rusty-red” ( Bell 1934) for D. porsena . Also, D. porsena occurs in Peru and western Brazil, within the distribution of D. ramusis and away from that of D. r. astrapaeus in northern South America ( Evans 1952, Mielke 1973, Cock and Alston-Smith 1990). For these reasons, D. porsena is here raised from synonymy and recognized as a species-level taxon.
Also, examination of material from Central America reaffirms that D. ramon ( Fig. 63, 66, 70, 73 View Figure 62-73 ) is a distinct species as it has been treated by some authors (e.g., Freeman 1976, de la Maza and de la Maza 1985, Bridges 1988, de la Maza et al. 1991, Warren 2000; see also Janzen et al. 2005). Its male genitalia ( Fig. 102 View Figure 98-103 ) are quite different from those of D. ramusis (see figure in Evans 1952). The female genitalia are also illustrated ( Fig. 109 View Figure 104-110 ). Accordingly, Dyscophellus ramon Evans, 1952 , new status, is here formally raised to species-level status.
Dyscophellus porsena is uncommon in the vicinity of Cacaulândia, with records in February, April to June, and November ( Fig. 127 View Figure 125-130 ). The species was known only from Peru ( Bell 1934).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dyscophellus porsena Bell, 1934
Austin, George T. 2008 |
Discophellus porsena
Bell 1934 |