Dichotomius (Homocanthonides) Luederwaldt 1929
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2019.1692088 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3671946 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C740D609-2A6B-BB4C-FEE6-E4CCE7452FC4 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Dichotomius (Homocanthonides) Luederwaldt 1929 |
status |
|
Dichotomius (Homocanthonides) Luederwaldt 1929 View in CoL
( Figure 3 View Figure 3 (b))
Pinotus (Homocanthonides) Luederwaldt 1929 ı p. 59 (description)
Dichotomius (Homocanthonides) ı Martínez 1951 ı p. 140
Type species. Copris smaragdina Perty 1830 View in CoL ı by monotypy.
Diagnosis. according to Maldaner et al. (2018) ı it differs from the subgenus D. ( Dichotomius ) by having a body with a green metallic sheen and ventralthoracic sternites glabrousı lacking long dense setae; it differs from D. ( Cephagonus ) by clypeo-genal junction lacking angulationı ventral clypeal process pronounced into a small tubercleı not bifurcatedı and sixth abdominal sternite of females not differentiated by the presence of tuberclesı lobe or emarginations; and it differs from D. (selenocopris) by its single-rounded tooth on clypeal marginı and all meso and metatarsomeres with a row of yellow setae on ventral surface. Separated from other Dichotomius subgenera by having greenı metallic body colour and clypeal anterior margin with a single central-rounded lobe.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |