Cyrnellus marginalis ( Banks 1930 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5082.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:795488E3-DE16-4268-8968-628C9D5E3A4A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5783698 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DEE90B-FFAF-4517-FF0A-FF18FAFDFA89 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cyrnellus marginalis ( Banks 1930 ) |
status |
|
Cyrnellus marginalis ( Banks 1930) View in CoL
Figs 3A–3D View FIGURE 3
Nyctiophylax marginalis Banks 1930: 231 View in CoL (original description); Ross 1938: 12 (designated male lectotype).
Cyrnellus marginalis Banks View in CoL ; Ross 1944: 71, 72 (descriptions of male, female); Flint 1964: 469 [as synonym of Cyrnellus fraternus ( Banks 1905) View in CoL ]; Holzenthal & Calor 2017: 418 (catalogue, as synonym of C. fraternus View in CoL ).
Cyrnellus zernyi Mosely 1934: 142 View in CoL (original description); Ross 1938: 13 (synonym of C. marginalis View in CoL )
Diagnosis. Cyrnellus marginalis is distinguished from other species in the genus by the following character combination: Subapicomesal spine of each inferior appendage conical, wide at base, subapical in position ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 , as); its internal lobe rounded ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 , il); the dorsal phallic sclerite has its anterior arm short ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 , ds) and posterior arms short and divergent ( Fig. 3D View FIGURE 3 , ds). Cyrnellus marginalis is considered to be distinct from C. fraternus by having the base of each intermediate appendage narrower than the median part whereas in C. fraternus the base is subequal to the median part ( Figs 3A, 3E View FIGURE 3 ). Another constant character is the ventral margin of each inferior appendage which is angulate in C. marginalis and sinuous in C. fraternus . An additional remarkable difference between the species is the position of the subapicomesal spine of each inferior appendage: in C. marginalis this spine is subapical by a distance as long as the width of the apex of the appendage ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3 ); in C. fraternus the spine’s subapical insertion is more than 1.5 times as far as the width of the apex of the appendage ( Fig. 3F View FIGURE 3 ); this distance is not constant among individuals of the same species ( Figs 3F, 3I–3K View FIGURE 3 ).
Material examined. BOLIVIA: Laguna Granja, Bella Vista , 13°15’50’’S, 63°42’33’’W, 06.v.2006, 1 male (IBN) GoogleMaps ; BRAZIL: Rondonia, 62 Km S de Ariquemes, Linea C-20, 7 Km E B- 65, 165 m, Fazenda Rancho Grande , 10°32,5´S, 62° 48´W, 17.xi.1991, Dr Peter, 3 males (USNM) GoogleMaps ; GUYANA: Karanambo, Rupununi R., 3°45,1´N, 59°18,6´W, 31.iii–2.iv.1994, MV Light, O.S. Flint Jr., 1 male (USNM); GoogleMaps Mazarini Potaro district, Takutu Luber Camp., Takutu Mountains , 6.25°N, 50.0°W, 29.xii.1982, Steiner, Lowry & Williams, 1 male (USNM); GoogleMaps Dunulay ranch, Aramanti River , 5°39,4´N, 57°35,5´W, 15–18.iv.1995, O.S. Flint Jr., 1 male (USNM) GoogleMaps ; PARAGUAY: Dpto Concepción, Concepción, UV Light trap between 5:45–12:30 PM, warm night 5 days after heavy rain, J.A. Kochalka, 12 males (USNM) ; URUGUAY: Artigas: San Gregorio, orillas del Río Uruguay , light trap, 29.xi.1959, 9 males (CFHCM) ; VENEZUELA: GU, Fundo Masaguaral, Caño Caracol, 19-20.i.1983, O.S. Flint Jr., 1 male (USNM); Río Caroni , at Paso Caruachi , 9.ii.1979, C.M. & O.S. Flint Jr., 1 male (USNM) .
Distribution. Cyrnellus marginalis is distributed in various South American countries but was collected and described for the first time in United States of America by Banks from Put-In-Bay, Ohio. Banks’ material could not be reviewed; his specimen could belong to C. fraternus , but because the two species have been considered synonyms since 1964, all existing North American records are suspect and need to be reviewed. It is reported for the first time from Bolivia. Bolivia new record, Brazil, Guyana, Paraguay, Uruguay, United States of America, Venezuela.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cyrnellus marginalis ( Banks 1930 )
Rueda Martín, Paola A., Gibon, Francois-Marie & Sganga, Julieta V. 2021 |
Cyrnellus marginalis
Holzenthal, R. W. & Calor, A. R. 2017: 418 |
Flint, O. S. Jr. 1964: 469 |
Ross, H. H. 1944: 71 |
Cyrnellus zernyi
Ross, H. H. 1938: 13 |
Mosely, M. E. 1934: 142 |
Nyctiophylax marginalis
Ross, H. H. 1938: 12 |
Banks, N. 1930: 231 |