Cybaeodes magnus, Ribera & de Mas, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3957.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C03CC56B-54A0-49C0-A173-0A657F5A6EA4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6100486 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/945D879F-9E02-170D-FF6B-FE39FC81FA7B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cybaeodes magnus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cybaeodes magnus View in CoL n. sp.
Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 9 – 10 View FIGURES 2 – 10 , 19 – 20, 22 View FIGURES 17 – 22
Cybaeodes liocraninus ( Simon, 1913) View in CoL (missidentification) Fage 1931: 209.
Type material. Holotype: 1 ♀ from Cova del Somo, municipality of Castell de Castells, Alacant, Spain, Zaragoza leg., 17.III.1979, (CRBA-UB 74-1839) . Paratypes: 1 ♀ from Cova de la Punta de Benimaquia, municipality of Denia, Alcoi, Alacant, Spain. Jordá leg., 18.VI.1968, (CRBA-UB 43-1071) ; 1 ♀ same locality, Sendra & Zaragoza leg., 1-VII-84. (CRBA-UB 85-2124) .
Etymology. The species epithet “ magnus ” refers to the size of this species; it is the largest species of Cybaeodes currently known.
Diagnosis. Male unknown. Females of this species can be recognized by the shape and size of the two strongly sclerotized semicircular lateral lobes ( Figs. 9 View FIGURES 2 – 10 , 19 View FIGURES 17 – 22 ), and by the anterior epigynal rim. The insemination ducts resemble those of C. dosaguas n. sp. ( Fig 8 View FIGURES 2 – 10 ), the most similar species, but those are thicker and less coiled in C. magnus ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 2 – 10 ) (see Diagnosis of C. dosaguas ).
Note: Fage (1931: 209) identified some juvenile specimens from Cova de la Punta de Benimaquia as Brachyanillus liocraninus Simon, 1913 , species described from a cave in Argelia and based on two juveniles specimens as well ( Bosselaers 2009: 49). Certainly it is a misidentification (see Discussion below).
Description of the female (holotype). Coloration: Prosoma yellowish brown, fovea brownish. Chelicera the same color as the carapace but slightly darker. Appendages pale yellowish brown, the apical segments slightly darker. Opisthosoma yellowish. Prosoma: Longer than wide in dorsal view. Fovea clearly visible, radial grooves scarcely marked ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17 – 22 ). Eyes greatly reduced to small, completely unpigmented lenses except the MA, which retain a slight pigmentation ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17 – 22 ). Eye size (diameter) LP 0.07, MP 0.05, LA 0.08, MA 0.05. Appendages: Robust chelicerae with dense pilosity on inner side. Long and robust fangs. Promargin with three teeth in basal position, middle tooth largest. Retromargin with two small teeth on apical position. Labium slightly longer than wide. Endites with same morphology as C. indalo n. sp. Long legs with deeply notched trochanters. Tarsal claws with five teeth and five pairs of tenent hairs on the tarsal tips. Leg formula: 4123. Opisthosoma: With a slight pubescence on the dorsal part. Spinnerets cylindrical, the anterior ones slightly shorter and thicker, separated at the base by a distance approximately equal to spinneret diameter. Epigyne ( Figs. 9 View FIGURES 2 – 10 , 19 View FIGURES 17 – 22 ): Oval genital area bounded at upper part by a sclerotized anterior rim. Two oval lobes strongly sclerotized, located in the center of the genital area. The two lobes show two small sclerotised pits located in the lateral margins. Vulva ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 2 – 10 ): Thick and recurved insemination ducts located at the center of the vulva, reaching the spermatheca within two sclerotized helmet-shaped structures. Measurements: PL = 3.42; PW = 2.69; OL = 4.79; OW = 2.44; total body length = 8.21.
Leg spination.
Habitat and distribution. Cybaeodes magnus n. sp. has been recorded in two caves 20 km apart ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ): Cueva del Somo in Castell de Castells (38.717181N, 0.151488W, 810 m asl.) and Cueva de la Punta de Benimaquia in Denia (38.821817N, 0.063930E, 163 m asl.).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cybaeodes magnus
Ribera, Carles & Mas, Eva De 2015 |
Cybaeodes liocraninus (
Fage 1931: 209 |