Cricocosmia jinningensis Hou and Sun, 2003

Han, Jian, Liu, Jianni, Zhang, Zhifei, Zhang, Xingliang & Shu, Degan, 2007, Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 52 (2), pp. 423-431 : 425-426

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13741646

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0388225B-B25C-3D3A-FF05-F895FAB084E6

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Cricocosmia jinningensis Hou and Sun, 2003
status

 

Cricocosmia jinningensis Hou and Sun, 2003

Figs. 1A–E View Fig , 2 View Fig , 3 View Fig .

Emended diagnosis.—Elongate trunk bears approximately 110 annuli that decrease in wide backwardly and usually form two sub−annuli on the dorsal side. Correspondingly, cone−shaped macrosclerites decrease in size and increase in height. Trunk with or without ventral spines.

Description.—The proboscis of Cricocosmia dictates the anterior/posterior orientation of this animal while the bilateral asymmetry is defined by the paired sclerites and the comparably smooth area between the two rows of lateral sclerites which consisting with the orientation of the terminal hooks, indicate the ventral side of the trunk.

Ventral spines: Approximately 5% of Cricocosmia specimens in our huge collections show two roughly longitudinal rows of tiny spines at the ventral side of the trunk ( Fig. 1A, B View Fig ). The arrangement of these spines is not regular, but usually, one annulus bears one or two such spines ( Fig. 1A, B View Fig ). The specimens described here do not show any other differences from those devoid of ventral spines.

Lateral sclerites: The presence on the trunk of Cricocosmia of a pair of cone−shaped sclerites on each annulus is well known ( Hou and Bergström 1994). Despite of the first pair of sclerites that are smaller than the second one, the lateral sclerites increase gradually in height and decrease in diameter toward the trunk end; those on the anterior part of the trunk appear to be dorso−ventrally extended elliptical inwardly−curved plates; on the middle part they are shaped as round plates each with a low−relief cone pointing backward; and the posterior sclerites are formed into curved backwardly−pointing sharp spines with a ground base ( Fig. 1A View Fig ). Each lateral sclerite has a marginal ridge that is wide and apparent at its part posterior ( Fig. 1E View Fig ).

SEM−BSE analysis reveals that the well−preserved lateral sclerites including the marginal ridges consist of a crudely diagonal meshwork of hemi−spherical tubercles or round concave pits ( Figs. 1C–E View Fig , 2A–C View Fig ). The surface with holes represents the inner side of the epicuticle whereas that with tubercles represents the outer side. In ELI−0001402 and ELI−0001404, the pits in the meshwork range from ca. 2 to 10 ̊m in diameter, and they apparently decrease in size towards the tip of the lateral sclerites ( Fig. 2A 2 –A View Fig 4 View Fig , C). The skeleton frame separating the pits is also ca. 2–10 ̊m in thickness. In ELI−0001403, the tubercles, which are located on the sclerites near the trunk end, seem to be uniform in diameter. However, the distal part does not show any microstructure probably due to poor preservation. The pits at the edge of the sclerites are complete or an incomplete pit ( Fig. 2A View Fig 3 View Fig ). Apparently, the sclerites on the posterior trunk are composed of less tubercles than the anterior ones ( Figs. 1C–E View Fig , 2A–C View Fig ). The thickness of the lateral sclerites is hard to estimate; possibly it is less than the diameter of the pits, ca. 10 ̊m.

SEM reveals that the sclerites in ELI−0001402 consist of densely packed finely spiculate minerals crystals less than 2 ̊m in length whereas the surrounding trunk surface is covered with iron oxide octahedral pseudomorphs of pyrite, which have been replaced by the spiculate mineral crystals ( Fig. 2A View Fig 4 View Fig , A 5 View Fig ). EDX and element mapping reveal that the lateral sclerites are composed mainly of iron oxide with fewer amounts of phosphorus, and the surrounding area is mainly composed of aluminosilicates, probably chlorite ( Fig. 3 View Fig ), thus, the spiculate probably are limonite. It should be noted that up to 3.53 wt% of organic carbon and lesser amounts of phosphorus and sulphur can be detected from the mapping area ( Table 1). EDX analysis in ELI−0001403 and ELI−0001404 shows similar results to ELI−0001402.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF