Ixchela simoni (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3608.5.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:458D7395-CC57-484E-94BD-7607F380B920 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6152235 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CB0B87BE-0361-FFF4-D2BA-6BB5BA6EFE48 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ixchela simoni (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898) |
status |
|
Ixchela simoni (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898) View in CoL
Figures 72–84 View FIGURES 72 – 84
Coryssocnemis simoni O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898: 237 , pl. 31, fig. 9 (description Ƥ). Coryssocnemis simoni F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1902: 371 , pl. 35, fig. 7 (Ƥ). Ixchela simoni . Huber, 2000: 153 (Ƥ transfer from Coryssocnemis ).
Type data. MEXICO: Guerrero: 1 Ƥ holotype (BMNH) (not examined), from Omiltemi [~ lat 17.5564°, lon - 99.6882°], Municipio Chilpancingo [H. H. Smith].
Material examined. MEXICO: Guerrero: 2 3, 2 ƤƤ, 2 immatures (CNAN 3320) [25 January 2012; A. Valdez, O. Francke, D. Ortiz, J. Mendoza, G. Contreras] from 2 km W of crossroad Omiltemi-Chautipan (lat 17.5552°, lon - 99.7236°; 2448 m), Municipio Chilpancingo. 1 immature (CNAN 3321) [25 January 2012; A. Valdez, O. Francke, D. Ortiz, J. Mendoza, G. Contreras] from 1 km E of Omiltemi (lat 17.5561°, lon -99.6729°; 1985 m), Municipio Chilpancingo. 2 immatures (CNAN 3322) [25 January 2012; A. Valdez, O. Francke, D. Ortiz, J. Mendoza, G. Contreras] from 2 km W of Omiltemi (lat 17.5481°, lon -99.6956°; 2216 m), Municipio Chilpancingo. 4 immatures (CNAN 3328) [23 July 2009; A. Valdez, O. Francke, H. Montaño, C. Santibañez, T. López, C. Quijano] from Omiltemi (lat 17.5546°, lon -99.6853°; 2623 m), Municipio Chilpancingo. 1 Ƥ (TMM-UT Inv. Zoo. Coll. # 52,512) [29 December 2002; P. Sprouse] from Acahuizotla, Resumidero de San Juan Francisco (lat 17.3253°, lon -99.3909°; 1222 m).
Diagnosis. Close relative of I. huberi , distinguished by chelicerae with FAC rounded and smaller ( Figs 74, 75 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ); rounded apically in lateral view ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ); by the palp femur larger ( Figs 78, 79 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ); by the embolus ventral-distal with long projection leaf-shaped ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ); and by epigyna with prominent conical apophysis ( Fig. 82 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ), slightly curved in lateral view ( Fig. 84 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ).
Description. Male. (CNAN 3320). Prosoma: Carapace pale yellow, with lateral wide spots, olive color ( Fig. 73 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). Ocular region brown, with a wide longitudinal olive line; two shorts olive lines behind the posterior median eyes ( Fig. 73 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). Fovea with a wide spot aroud it, olive color ( Fig. 73 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). Clypeus with a wide trapezoidal region along, olive color ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). Chelicerae dark brown on prolateral and retrolateral parts; prolaterally small pale region on basal and distal parts. FAC brown, quelicerae with inconspicuous SAC ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). Sternum orange, labium and endites brown, pale distally, prolateral apophysis of endites orange. Legs: Coxae pale yellow. Trochanters brown. Femora orange, paler basally and distally, with a marked width ring sub-distally. Patellae dark. Tibiae light brown, with a dark wide ring basally and other one distally. Metatarsi and tarsi brown. Opisthosoma: Conical, pale blue, larger than high ( Fig. 72 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). Gonopore plate olive color, rounded. Palp: Femur pale orange, conical, thin basally and wide distally; with VAF small, projected upward ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). Patella pale orange. Tibia orange, paler basally. Procursus brown, paler basally; conical with distal curved spine; with two dorsal basal projections ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). VPP rounded, with numerous long setae ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). Embolus conical ( Figs 78, 79 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ), with sclerotized spine small and sub-distal on the embolus (arrow Fig. 80 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). PAB long and wide ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). Embolus with long curved dorsal-distal spine; ventrally with sclerotized long projection leaf-shaped ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). Measurements: Total length 7.40. Carapace 2.85 long, 2.50 wide. Clypeus 1.07 long. Diameter AME 0.14, ALE 0.24, PME 0.20, PLE 0.22. Distance ALE-PME 0.18, PME-PME 0.26. Leg I: 40.19 (10.81+1.02+10.62+13.12+4.62). tibia II: 7.25, tibia III: 5.70, tibia IV: 7.40; tibia I l/d 21.50.
Female. (CNAN 3320). Similar to the male, differences: Prosoma: Chelicerae brown. Dorsal lateral spots darker than on males. Ocular region darker than on males. Spot around the fovea darker than on males. Clypeus with very maked long straight region, not trapezoidal. Sternum and endites darker than on males. Legs: femora, tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi paler than on males. Epigynum: Slightly wider than long ( Figs 81, 82, 84 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). PP curved laterally; MSE with a marked Y-shaped upside down; long concavities sac-like between MSE and PP ( Fig. 83 View FIGURES 72 – 84 ). Measurements: Total length 7.70. Carapace 2.65 long, 2.45 wide. Clypeus 0.90 long. Diameter AME 0.12, ALE 0.25, PME 0.22, PLE 0.26. Distance 0.23, ALE-PME 0.18. PME-PME 0.27. Leg I: 36.60 (9.62+1.10+10.00+11.75+4.13), tibia II: 6.70, tibia III: 5.30, tibia IV: 6.87; tibia I l/d 22.85.
Variation. Females have carapace yellow paler than the males. The carapace and clypeus pattern are darker olive on females than males. Sternum and legs darker orange on males than females. Labium markedly darker in females than males. Male tibia I: 10.62, missing. Female tibia I: 10.00, missing.
Natural History. The specimens were collected on their sheet webs in an oak-pine forest ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ), among boulders and on walls along road-cuts in wet and shaded areas covered with roots ( Figs 17, 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ).
Distribution. MEXICO: Guerrero (O. Pickard-Cambridge 1898, F. O. Pickard-Cambridge 1902) ( Fig. 85 View FIGURE 85 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.