Cornigerius, Mordukhai-Boltovskoi, 1967
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4619.1.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:00A4A61A-DA95-48BB-A3E1-E45310B93263 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4323664 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D72587CE-143B-FFD3-FF03-FAF5B748FAAF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cornigerius |
status |
|
Taxonomy of Cornigerius View in CoL View at ENA .
For morphological illustrations, the reader is referred to Mordukhai-Boltovskoy (1967) and Rivier (1998). Four species have been classified in Cornigerius View in CoL . The first, C. maeoticus ( Pengo, 1879) View in CoL , used to be a common and widespread animal (before the Mnemiopsis View in CoL invasion), found across the entire Caspian Lake, the north Black Sea, and the mouth of all major rivers debouching in the basin. This includes lakes in the delta of the Volga, Don and Dnieper rivers, which are of fresh water. The 1950s–1960s were a time of dam construction on almost all Ponto-Caspian rivers, and the species spontaneously expanded to the reservoirs thus created. It is euryionic and tolerates salinities of up to 10 0 / 00. It crossed the Volga Baltic gap in 2003 ( Panov et al., 2007) but was not observed in the Baltic afterwards (Aladin, pers. com.) and is still not seen there today (Van Damme, pers. com.). Its expansion to the Baltic must be considered a failure.
Morphologically, C. maeoticus bears divergent horns on the head, springing from a common peduncle. Long, curved horns are typical of maeoticus , short horns define C. bicornis , but there is considerable within-population variability and overlap in this character. The trunk bears two divergent spines, but again, their size and shape are variable, rendering separation from the next two “species” subjective.
C. bicornis ( Zernov, 1901) is thus hard to differentiate from C. lacustris and C. maeoticus , and shares a tolerance to freshwater and an upper salinity limit of about 10 0 / 00 with it. It also expanded into the newly created reservoirs on the major rivers.As the two occur mixed across their full range and overlap in morphology, one cannot trust identification in the literature, and it seems best to synonymize them.
C. lacustris differs hardly from the preceding, by having short horns and ‘less’ divergent trunk thorns, set by spinules. Such characters may be taxonomically meaningful, but they may also be adaptive morphologies and their development may depend on age, temperature and strain.
The fourth species, C. arvidi Mordukhai-Boltovskoi 1967 , is distinct by the horns on the head not springing from a common but from two distinct stalks on the head. This species is restricted to the salinity of the middle-south caspian, 5–14 0 / 00. It is not found in the fresher northern third of the lake and in the entire Black Sea, and rarely co-occurs with the preceding species. Therefore, morphology as well as ecology support its species status, and we conclude that the genus is composed of two species, well segregated spatially and ecologically.
COI. The five sequences from Lake Hazar were identical, repeating a single haplotype. Within-population differences in both the Caspian Lake and Black Sea were about 0.3 %. Differences between Black Sea and Caspian Lake animals ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ) were few ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 and Figure 1 View FIGURE 1 ) but more numerous (genetic distance 1.57 %) than between Black Sea and Hazar Lake (distance ca. 0.9 %). The largest, but still small, genetic distance was between Lake Hazar and the Caspian Lake (1.89 %). A Bayesian tree illustrates well the main point ( Figure 2 View FIGURE 2 ): the three populations are all close, but the Hazar lake population is genetically closer to the Black Sea than to the Caspian Lake.
C. maeoticus AY189510 View Materials BS | C.maeoticus AY189513 View Materials BS | C. maeoticus AY189512 View Materials BS | C. maeoticus AY189511 View Materials BS | C. lacustris 12805 LH | C. lacustris 12892 LH | C.lacustris 12807 LH | C. lacustris 12814 LH | C. lacustris 12816 LH | C. maeoticus AY189515 View Materials CL | C. maeoticus AY189516 View Materials CL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. maeoticus AY189513 View Materials | BS | 0.0016 | ||||||||||
C. maeoticus AY189512 View Materials | BS | 0.0016 | 0.0031 | |||||||||
C. maeoticus AY189511 View Materials | BS | 0.0015 | 0.0031 | 0.0031 | ||||||||
C. lacustris 12805 | LH | 0.0078 | 0.0094 | 0.0094 | 0.0094 | |||||||
C. lacustris 12892 | LH | 0.0078 | 0.0094 | 0.0094 | 0.0094 | 0.0000 | ||||||
C. lacustris 12807 | LH | 0.0078 | 0.0094 | 0.0094 | 0.0094 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |||||
C. lacustris 12814 | LH | 0.0078 | 0.0094 | 0.0094 | 0.0094 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||
C. lacustris 12816 | LH | 0.0078 | 0.0094 | 0.0094 | 0.0094 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |||
C. maeoticus AY189515 View Materials | CL | 0.0125 | 0.0141 | 0.0141 | 0.0141 | 0.0173 | 0.0173 | 0.0173 | 0.0173 | 0.0173 | ||
C. maeoticus AY189516 View Materials | CL | 0.0141 | 0.0157 | 0.0157 | 0.0157 | 0.0189 | 0.0189 | 0.0189 | 0.0189 | 0.0189 | 0.0016 | |
C. maeoticus AY189514 View Materials | CL | 0.0141 | 0.0157 | 0.0157 | 0.0157 | 0.0189 | 0.0189 | 0.0189 | 0.0189 | 0.0189 | 0.0016 | 0.0031 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Cornigerius
Dumont, Henri J. & Vierstraete, Andy 2019 |
Cornigerius
Mordukhai-Boltovskoi 1967 |
Mnemiopsis
L.Agassiz 1860 |