Charpentieria itala triumplinae Nardi, 2011
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1077.67081 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C28AD65A-76F2-42CF-BED7-DFB3702CABCE |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/96BDD215-87DE-5ED4-B115-41B07AACC572 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Charpentieria itala triumplinae Nardi, 2011 |
status |
|
Charpentieria itala triumplinae Nardi, 2011
Figs 48.5-48.6, 49.1-49.2, 50.4, 50.5 View Figure 48
Distribution.
This subspecific taxon of C. itala is endemic to the Central Alps. It is known from the type locality and few scattered localities in the Val Trompia area: Corna Blacca, Passo delle Portole, Cima Caldoline, Passo della Berga and other localities in the municipalities of Lavenone and Collio (Brescia, Lombardia, Italy), from 1500 m asl up ( Nardi 2011: 99-100).
Specimens examined.
Italy, Lombardia, Brescia, Lavenone , Cima Caldoline. 1700 m asl, 45°48'3.54"N, 10°24'20.12"E, G. Nardi leg. and det., 2 dissected spm GoogleMaps .
External morphology of the genital organs
(Fig. 49 View Figure 49 .1). The V is half as long as the FO. The FDBC is 2 × longer than the SDBC+BC. The BC+SDBC is club-like, short, with no clear distinction between the SDBC and the BC. The D is slightly longer than the SDBC+BC. The V is short and cylindrical. The PC is ~ 2 × as long as the V. The P is swollen. The transition between P and EP is clearly visible. The PR is short and robust. The E is much shorter than the P but wide in diameter.
Internal morphology of the genital organs
(Fig. 49 View Figure 49 .2). The A is smooth. The V presents irregular pleats. The P is completely smooth. The PP is folded and elongated. It occupies 3/4 of the internal penial volume. The PP originates from the ER that is directly connected with the ELP. The epiphallar formula is: PP(ER(ELP)). The E shows two moderately fringed ELP. They proximally fade before the VD.
Remarks.
Nardi (2011: 99) roughly described the anatomy of the genital organs providing a sketch of a specimen from the same locality we had available as well. His description and depiction differ from our anatomical results by a remarkably shorter FO and a longer V, whereas the remaining genital external details seem to be similar (e.g., the penial complex). Nardi (2011: 99) did not provide any detail of the internal sculpturing of the genital organs, depicting only the pseudopapilla (named "papilla penis"). Moreover, the pseudopapilla appears slightly different according to our results, being it smooth instead of folded. However, its general conical shape and dimensions (in comparison with the volume of the penis) match with our results. The folding of its surface could be due to a reproductive/seasonal/physiological moment of the specimen at the time of collecting/fixation.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |