Calendula suffruticosa subsp. tunetana
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.605.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E82AFC0A-1567-CA45-66ED-F80C859AFB06 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Calendula suffruticosa subsp. tunetana |
status |
|
suffruticosa and subsp. tunetana View in CoL that do not occur in Morocco, and excluding subsp. balansae , subsp. boissieri and subsp. tlemcensis from Algeria)
1. Trialate achenes present .................................................................................................................................................................... 2
– Trialate achenes absent ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7
2. Basal leaves linear to narrowly oblanceolate .................................................................................................... 11o. subsp. tunetana View in CoL
– Basal leaves oblanceolate to spatulate .............................................................................................................................................. 3
3. Rostrate achenes curved forming and angle of approx. 90º and with spines 0.5–1.5 mm on the dorsal face ..................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................... 11c. subsp. djurdjurensis
– Rostrate achenes straigth, or not so curved, usually without spines ................................................................................................ 4
4. Plants with a predominantly white-arachnoid indumentum ............................................................................................................. 5
– Plants glabrous to glandulose ........................................................................................................................................................... 6
5. Trialate achenes (11.7) 12.4–13.8 (14.5) × (8.8) 9.1–9.2 mm, with length/width> 1.5 ..................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................... 11i. subsp. marsaensis
– Trialate achenes (6.3) 8.4–9.8 (10.3) × (5.3) 6–9.1 (10) mm, with length/width approx. 1 ......................... 11f. subsp. guruguensis
6. Trialate achenes length (7.8) 8.5–9.2 (9.8) mm ................................................................................................... 11n. subsp. trialata View in CoL
– Trialate achenes length (7.7) 10.2–13.5 (16.2) mm ........................................................................................... 11j. subsp. monardii View in CoL
7. Middle achenes exclusively bialate (10.5) 13.5–16.1 (22) × (6.7) 8.5–11.1 (11.7) mm, with a rostrum (2.5) 3.3–4.5 (9.7) mm, lateral wings sinuate-dentate to incise dentate; inner vermiculate achenes falcate .............................................. 11d. subsp. foliosa
– Middle achenes not exclusively bialate, with another more predominant type of achene (sub-cymbiform or cymbiform), and/or smaller and margins entire or almost entire; inner vermiculate achenes ±circular, not falcate ........................................................ 8
8. Middle achenes sub-exalate or, at least, predominantly sub-exalate ............................................................... 11h. subsp. lusitanica View in CoL
– Middle achenes, not sub-exalate ....................................................................................................................................................... 9
9. Outer rostrate achenes length (17) 21.5–26.5 (29) mm, with conspicuous dorsal spines averaging 2 mm ......... 11e. subsp. fulgida View in CoL
– Outer rostrate achenes smaller, without spines, with spines much smaller, or less abundant ........................................................ 10
10. Indumentum of leaves and stems predominantly white-arachnoid ................................................................................................ 11
– Indumentum of leaves and stems not predominantly white-arachnoid, ± glabrous to glandulose, or mostly glandulose with young parts ± white-arachnoid .................................................................................................................................................................. 12
11. Outer rostrate achenes length (5) 6–10.2 (13.5) mm, with 4-6 dorsal spines averaging 1 mm; middle achenes exclusively cymbiform .......................................................................................................................................................... 11b. subsp. dersana
– Outer rostrate achenes length (7) 12.3–16.1 (17) mm, without dorsal spines; middle achenes cymbiform, sub-cymbiform and/or bialate .......................................................................................................................................................... 11g. subsp. hosmarensis
12. Indumentum of leaves and stems predominantly ± glabrous to glandulose ................................................................................... 13
– Indumentum of leaves and stems mostly ± glabrous to glandulose but with young parts ± white-arachnoid ................................14
13. Rostrate achenes length (21) 24–30 (31) mm; cymbiform achenes width 5.8–7.3 (8.3) mm ......................... 11m. subsp. tazaensis
– Rostrate achenes length (11) 16–23 (26) mm; cymbiform achenes width (6.7) 7.7–10.8 (11.8) mm ........... 11l. subsp. suffruticosa View in CoL
14. Ratio length/width of basal leaves (2.5) 2.7–4.2 (4.7); basal leaves thickness (0.2) 0.3–0.4 (0.5) mm ............. 11k. subsp. riffensis
– Ratio length/width of basal leaves (4.9) 5.0–6.3 (6.5); basal leaves thickness (0.3) 0.4–0.6 (0.8) mm ......... 11a. subsp. boccoyana
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.