Basirotyleptus acus Goseco, Ferris & Ferris, 1974
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.791.1645 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2AEDEBA5-69C9-4630-B4BE-C109B6B0D270 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6304111 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0928878A-FFC1-BE14-6CA3-FA3DFE76FD45 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Basirotyleptus acus Goseco, Ferris & Ferris, 1974 |
status |
|
Basirotyleptus acus Goseco, Ferris & Ferris, 1974 View in CoL
Fig. 5 View Fig , Table 5 View Table 5
Basirotyleptus acus Goseco et al., 1974: 12 View in CoL , 14.
Basirotyleptus pini View in CoL – Furstenberg 1980: 153–155.
Material examined
INDIA – Kerala State • 11 ♀♀; Palakkad district, Silent Valley National Park ; 11º03′49.6″ N, 76º32′17.4″ E; 5–15 cm depth; 26 Oct. 2017; soil samples collected from around the roots of forest trees (unidentified); slides reference number AMU/ZD/NC/ Basirotyleptus acus /1–4 GoogleMaps . – Tamil Nadu State • 7 ♀♀; Nilgiris district, Mudumalai National Park ; 11º32′35.4″ N, 76º31′24.1″ E; 5–15 cm depth; 14 Nov. 2016; soil samples collected from around the roots of shrubs (unidentified); slides reference number AMU/ZD/NC/ Basirotyleptus acus /5–8 GoogleMaps .
.
Description
Female
Small sized nematodes, slightly curved ventrad or open C-shaped upon fixation; body cylindrical, tapering gradually towards both extremities but more so towards the anterior end. Cuticle with two distinct layers, 1.0–1.5 µm thick at anterior region, 1.5–2.0 µm at midbody and 2.0–2.5 μm on tail. Outer cuticle thin, with fine transverse striations; inner layer thick, striated, loose, its outline irregular, with distinct radial refractive elements. Lateral chords occupying about 28–35% of midbody diameter. Lateral body pores distinct; 1–3 in neck region; 1–2 from pharyngeal base to vulva and 3–8 post-vulval region. Dorsal and ventral body pores indistinct. Lip region cap-like, offset by constriction, 2.0–2.3 times as wide as high or about one-third to two-fifths of the body diameter at neck base. Lips rounded, amalgamated; inner part slightly elevated. Labial and cephalic papillae distinct but not interfering with labial contour. Amphids duplex, stirrup-shaped, their aperture about one-half to three-fifths as wide as lip region diameter. Stoma a long, slender truncate cone, slightly sclerotized in the perioral region. Odontostyle very slender, solid, thin needle-like, sometimes slightly dorsally bent, 1.2–1.6 times the lip region diameter long. Odontophore simple, sclerotized, about 1.0–1.1 times the odontostyle length. Guiding ring simple, refractive, at 1.2–1.4 times the lip region diameter from anterior end. Pharynx consisting of a slender and slightly muscular anterior part, expanding gradually into a short pear-shaped basal bulb, with a perceptible thickening at the posterior part of its inner lining, occupying about 14– 18% of total neck length. Nerve ring at 51–60% of neck length from anterior end. Cardia rounded to conoid, about one-fifth to one-fourth of the corresponding body diameter long.
Genital system monodelphic-opisthodelphic. Ovary reflexed, measuring 42–89 μm; oocytes arranged in single row except near tip. Oviduct joining the ovary subterminally, measuring 44–63 μm, consisting of a slender distal portion and a well-developed pars dilatata. Oviduct-uterus junction marked by weak sphincter. Uterus short and slender tube without any specialization, measuring 17–30 μm.Anterior genital branch usually absent or reduced to a very small sac, about one-fifth to one-third midbody diameter long. Sperm cell absent. Vagina cylindrical, extending slight posteriorly, 8.5–11.5 μm or about two-fifths to one-half (40–52%) of midbody diameter; pars proximalis vaginae 5.5–7.5 × 4.0–6.0 μm, encircled by circular muscles; pars distalis vaginae 3.5–4.5 μm with slightly curved walls; pars refringens absent. Vulva apparently a transverse slit. Prerectum 2.5–3.8 and rectum 0.9–1.3 times anal body diameter long. Tail short, rounded to conoid, 0.6–0.8 times anal body diameter long, with a pair of caudal pores on each side, a distinct terminal pore also present.
Male
Not found.
Remarks
Goseco et al. (1974) described this species from the Indiana. The morphometrics of present populations conform well with the type population except in having a slightly longer odontostyle (10.0–11.5 vs 8 µm), slightly shorter odontophore (11–13 vs 14.4 µm); shorter pharyngeal bulb (15–20 vs 22 µm); longer vagina (8.5–11.5 vs 13 µm) and presence of anterior uterine sac in some specimens (vs anterior uterine sac absent). This species is reported here for the first time from India.
During the present study, two populations representing eighteen specimens were collected from the Western Ghats, India. Although in some specimens of the present populations a very small anterior uterine sac was present, other morphometric values completely overlapped to with those in B. acus , and therefore these specimens are considered as B. acus .
Furstenberg (1980) redescribed B. pini Siddiqi & Khan, 1965 based on two populations comprising twenty eight females from Australia and mentioned that Australian specimens correspond well with type population of B. pini except for the absence of anterior uterine sac in some specimens. Some doubt exists on the correct identity of the Australian population as it shows some morphological differences i.e., differently shaped odontostyle (odontostyle very slender, thin needle-like vs slender, simple needle-like); differently shaped lip region (lip region low, flat, offset by slight constriction vs lip region comparatively higher, angular, offset by deep constriction), labial papillae not interfering with labial contour (vs labial papillae interfering with labial contour, forming a liplets-like structure), and absence of anterior uterine sac in some specimens (vs anterior uterine present in every specimen). The morphometrics of Furstenberg (1980) population is quite comparable to B. acus except in the presence of anterior uterine sac in some specimens (vs absent in the type population). With the addition of present populations, which have specimens both with or without sac, B. pini apud Furstenberg, 1980 is considered here as B. acus .
Localities | Mukkali population | Modumalai population |
---|---|---|
Characters | Females | Females |
n | 11 | 7 |
L | 486.1 ± 50.5 (391–552) | 530.0 ± 40.6 (471–594) |
Body diameter at neck base | 18.9 ± 0.98 (17.5–20.5) | 18.9 ± 0.68 (18.5–20.5) |
Body diameter at mid body | 20.9 ± 1.1 (19.5–23.5) | 21.0 ± 0.98 (19.5–22.5) |
Body diameter at anus | 13.9 ± 1.5 (11.5–16.5) | 13.5 ± 0.58 (12.5–14.5) |
a | 23.1 ± 1.7 (20.0–25.6) | 24.7 ± 2.2 (21.3–28.7) |
b | 4.8 ± 0.38 (4.2–5.4) | 4.7 ± 0.18 (4.5–5.0) |
c | 48.9 ± 4.5 (40.5–54.7) | 48.3 ± 2.6 (44.5–53.4) |
c’ | 0.72 ± 0.07 (0.61–0.84) | 0.79 ± 0.06 (0.64–0.85) |
V | 36.9 ± 1.2 (35.5–39.8) | 36.9 ± 1.6 (35.7–41.0) |
G2 | 20.5 ± 3.1 (13.3–24.5) | 18.2 ±2.4 (14.6–21.5) |
Lip region diameter | 7.2 ± 0.32 (7.0–8.0) | 7.6 ± 0.34 (7.0–8.0) |
Lip region height | 3.3 ± 0.20 (3.0–3.5) | 3.6 ± 0.24 (3.5–4.0) |
Amphidial aperture | 3.5 ± 0.22 (3.5–4.0) | 3.8 ± 0.18 (3.5–4.0) |
Odontostyle length | 11.5 ± 0.26 (10–11) | 11.0 ± 0.54 (10.5–11.5) |
Odontophore length | 11.4 ± 0.58 (11–12) | 12.0 ± 0.88 (11–13) |
Total stylet length | 22.2 ± 0.73 (21–23) | 23.0 ± 1.3 (21.5–24.5) |
Guiding ring from anterior end | 9.0 ± 0.39 (8.5–9.5) | 9.6 ± 0.21 (9.0–10) |
Nerve ring from anterior end | 57.8 ± 2.0 (54–61) | 62.8 ± 1.6 (60–65) |
Neck length | 99.6 ± 4.4 (93–106) | 111.3 ± 4.6 (102–119) |
Expanded part of pharynx | 15.5 ± 0.92 (15–18) | 18.9 ± 0.83 (17–20) |
Cardia length | 4.8 ± 0.14 (4.5–5.0) | 4.4 ± 0.71 (3.0–5.0) |
Anterior genital branch | 4.9 ± 0.61 (4.0–6.0) | 5.8 ± 0.42 (5.0–6.5) |
Posterior genital branch | 100.8 ± 13.5 (70–117) | 97.7 ± 9.1 (84–112) |
Vaginal length | 10.0 ± 0.76 (8.5–10.5) | 10.8 ± 0.57 (10.0–11.5) |
Vulva from anterior end | 179.4 ± 19.1 (139–201) | 199.6 ± 12.1 (179–213) |
Prerectum length | 42.7 ± 5.0 (38–53) | 42.7 ± 3.1 (39–49) |
Rectum length | 15.1 ± 1.7 (13.5–17.5) | 17.0 ± 0.97 (15.5–18.5) |
Tail length | 9.9 ± 1.2 (8.0–11.5) | 10.7 ± 0.98 (9.0–12) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Basirotyleptus acus Goseco, Ferris & Ferris, 1974
Islam, Md Niraul & Ahmad, Wasim 2022 |
Basirotyleptus pini
Furstenberg J. P. 1980: 153 |
Basirotyleptus acus
Goseco C. G. & Ferris V. R. & Ferris J. M. 1974: 12 |