Babycurus ornatus Werner, 1936
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.6544157 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6580A0C7-E18D-4B06-A158-522F089CEAF5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6533786 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7E4D87D8-8554-FFE8-09E2-DF84FE144FB7 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Babycurus ornatus Werner, 1936 |
status |
|
Taxonomic position of Babycurus ornatus Werner, 1936
Babycurus ornatus was described by Werner in 1936 from Mozambique and has been accepted as valid by other authors ( Vachon, 1940: 179; Weidner, 1959: 98; Lamoral & Reynders, 1975: 498; Kovařík, 1998: 104; Fet & Lowe, 2000: 79; Kovařík, 2000: 252). The first author (F.K.) recently studied the types ( Figs. 40– 49 View Figures 40–49 ) and found that legs III and IV both bear tibial spurs ( Figs. 46–47 View Figures 40–49 ). This character is diagnostic for the genus Lychas C. L. Koch, 1845 , whereas in genera Babycurus and Barbaracurus gen. n., leg III lacks tibial spurs (only present on leg IV) (e.g. Figs. 99–106 View Figures 95–106 ). Moreover, it was found that the types of Babycurus ornatus and Lychas burdoi are precisely matched in the following key characters: trichobothrial pattern, pedipalp finger dentation ( Figs. 44–45 View Figures 40–49 ), pectinal tooth count and pectine lamellar structure, body and appendage proportions, setation, carination and sculpture of pedipalps, carapace, tergites, sternites, form of metasoma and telson ( Figs. 40–49 View Figures 40–49 ), as well as armature of chelicerae and pedipalp fingers. The inevitable conclusion is that Babycurus ornatus Werner, 1936 is a junior synonym of Lychas burdoi (Simon, 1882) syn. n.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |