Rhombonemertes, Hookabe & Moritaki & Jimi & Ueshima, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jcz.2022.10.003 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AE6187FD-FFAA-FF8D-FC84-FAD07C15F9B0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rhombonemertes |
status |
gen. nov. |
4.1. Systematic discussion for Rhombonemertes gen. nov.
Members of Oerstediidae Chernyshev, 1993 are morphologically circumscribed by a bilayered rhynchocoel-wall musculature, the cephalic vessels protruding into the rhynchocoel in cerebral ring, and the mid-dorsal vessel not penetrating the rhynchocoel (= lacking vascular plug) ( Kajihara, 2021). Although the cephalic vessels could not be traced in the cerebral region, the other two features were confirmed in R. rublinea gen. et sp. nov. ( Fig. 3H, L View Fig ), leading to our conclusion that the species belongs to Oerstediidae . This is further supported by the molecular phylogenetic analyses, where R. rublinea gen. et sp. nov. is nested in the Oerstediidae clade and more closely related to the monophyletic Oerstedia clade than to Argonemertes australiensis ( Dendy, 1892) in Plectonemertidae Gibson, 1990 ( Fig. 5 View Fig ).
Among 127 monostiliferan genera ( Kajihara 2021), comparatively few are known to possess a short rhynchocoel ( Gibson 1990b). In Table 2, free-living marine oerstediid genera with a bilayered rhynchocoel wall, rhynchocoel extending half the body length or shorter, and without a vascular plug are listed with selected morphological characters. R. rublinea gen. et sp. nov. is dissimilar to any known oerstediid species other than except Ischyronemertes Gibson, 1990 . This is especially due to: i) the presence of body-wall diagonal musculature, ii) the longitudinal muscle layer of body wallnot divided anteriorly, iii) the presence of a precerebral septum, iv) 4 eyes, and v) free-living, not parasitic or commensal lifestyle. Ischyronemertes was originally described from mid-to lower shore in Vancouver Peninsula (Western Australia) for three species, I. albanyensis Gibson, 1990 , I. erythrophleps Gibson, 1990 , and I. tetrophthalma Gibson, 1990 . Most conspicuous difference between R. rublinea gen. et sp. nov. and Ischyronemertes is the shape of head; the former possesses a lozenge-shaped head while the latter is characterized by a more rectangular, somewhat anteriorly bilobed head ( Gibson 1990b, figs. 17, 19, 21). The new species is also differentiated from I. albanyensis and I. erythrophleps in the number and arrangement of eyes—four large eyes in the new species ( Fig. 2A, B, D View Fig ) and 2–6 small eyes more or less irregularly arranged in four groups in I. albanyensis and I. erythrophleps ( Gibson 1990b) . Furthermore, accessory nerves are present in lateral nerve cords of Ischyronemertes ( Gibson 1990b) , which is another difference between R. rublinea gen. et sp. nov. and Ischyronemertes . Based on these morphological differences between the existing genera in Oerstediidae , we establish a new genus, Rhombonemertes gen. nov., for R. rublinea gen. et sp. nov.
In addition to the oerstediid genera in Table 2, Nemertopsis tetraclitophila Gibson, 1990 resembles R. rublinea gen. et sp. nov. in terms of the internal morphology; Hong Kong specimens of N. tetraclitophila exceptionally lack a mid-dorsal vascular plug in the genus ( Gibson 1990a), and thereby display a character state that fits morphological circumscription of Oerstediidae ( Kajihara 2021) . As was the case in Nemertopsis quadripunctata ( Quoy & Gaimard, 1833) ( Kajihara 2007) , however, the vascular plug might be hard to recognize in the Hong Kong specimens due to the small-sized body. Thus, the internal morphology of N. tetraclitophila needs to be revisited with additional materials. Apart from the internal morphology, R. rublinea gen. et sp. nov. is clearly distinguished from N. tetraclitophila in the external appearance—two longitudinal dark-green stripes on the dorsal surface and the rounded head in N. tetraclitophila .
In the resulting tree, R. rublinea gen. et sp. nov. was a sister clade of Monostilifera sp. Genroku Seamount ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); uncorrected p- distance based on COI between the two species was higher than interspecific COI divergences (e.g., Chen et al., 2010; Sundberg et al., 2016; Hookabe et al., 2022). Morphological differences between the two species also warrant the recognition of R. rublinea as a species distinct from Monostilifera sp. Genroku Seamount—the latter species lacking eyes and diagonal muscles of the body wall, and having rhynchocoel extending 3/4 of the body length. The sister-taxon relationships with the clade formed by R. rublinea gen. et sp. nov. and Monostilifera sp. Genroku Seamount were not well resolved in our ML and BI analyses ( Fig. 5 View Fig ). More extensive taxon sampling including apparently polyphyletic, and yet-to-be-discovered deep-sea oerstediid lineages will be required to obtain a more robust phylogeny of these taxa.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.