Arcofaciella indiana, Chen & Yang, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.748.1341 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E1934A9A-AC29-4B41-84A0-56AF6F18B220 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4745086 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7227AA9A-1341-45BA-8F20-EB841BED705D |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:7227AA9A-1341-45BA-8F20-EB841BED705D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Arcofaciella indiana |
status |
sp. nov. |
Arcofaciella indiana View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7227AA9A-1341-45BA-8F20-EB841BED705D
Diagnosis
Arcofaciella indiana sp. nov. can be distinguished from the remaining species of the genus by the frons in profile ( Figs 1I View Fig , 2B View Fig ) not inclined anteriorly, the clypeus in profile ( Figs 1I View Fig , 2B View Fig ) bent at obtuse angle to frons, the presence of a median carina on the clypeus ( Fig. 2C View Fig ), and the genital styles with inner apical angle not bifurcate ( Fig. 2H–J View Fig ).
Etymology
This new species is named after the type locality, India.
Type material
Holotype INDIA • ♂; Karnataka, Mysore ; 12°30′ N, 76°64′ E; 2 Aug. 1972; C.A. Viraktamath leg.; on bamboo; GUGC-FDTA-19720801 .
Paratype INDIA • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; GUGC-FDTA-19720802 .
Description
MEASUREMENTS. Body length including forewing: male (holotype, GUGC-FDTA-19720801) 4.3 mm (N = 1); female (paratype, GUGC-FDTA-19720802) 4.6 mm (N = 1); forewing length: male (holotype) 3.8 mm (N = 1); female (paratype) 4.0 mm (N = 1).
COLORATION. General color yellowish brown to brown ( Fig. 1 View Fig ). Vertex ( Fig. 1G View Fig ) grayish brown, middle area somewhat reddish orange. Frons grayish brown. Clypeus yellow brown. Rostrum yellow brown, distal part black brown. Genae yellow brown to brown. Eyes black brown, ocelli reddish brown. Antennae yellow brown, first segment with distal part and second segment with base part dark brown ( Fig. 1H–I View Fig ). Pronotum grayish brown, middle area somewhat reddish orange, lateral margin brown. Mesonotum grayish brown to brown, intercarinal area somewhat reddish orange ( Fig. 1G View Fig ). Forewings ( Fig. 2D View Fig ) semitransparent, basal half with large inclined yellowish brown stripe, apical half except area between veins ScP and MP 1 yellowish brown, a small round callus near ScP-R fork and another near CuA fork piceous, veins brown with yellowish white granules, veins dashed, apex of longitudinal veins brown. Thorax with ventral and lateral areas grayish brown. Legs yellowish brown to brown, with dark brown ring markings.
HEAD AND THORAX.Vertex ( Fig. 2A View Fig ) at midline shorter than wide at base (0.29:1), width at apex narrower than at base (0.64:1). Frons ( Fig. 2C View Fig ) 1.23 times longer in middle line than widest part, narrower at apex than at base (0.69:1). Antennae ( Fig. 2C View Fig ) with first segment longer than wide at apex (1.25:1), shorter than second segment (0.48:1). Pronotum ( Fig. 2A View Fig ) at midline slightly shorter than vertex (0.91:1), lateral carinae arched, medially concave, flexing backwards near middle at sub-right angle and nearly attaining hind margin. Mesonotum ( Fig. 2A View Fig ) 2.82 times as long as vertex and pronotum combined in middle line. Forewing ( Fig. 2D View Fig ) in middle line longer than wide at widest part (2.75:1). Spinal formula of hind tibia 5-7-5.
MALE GENITALIA. Anal segment ( Fig. 2E View Fig ) in lateral view small, ring-like, without anal process. Pygofer narrow with ventral margin much longer than dorsal margin in lateral view, laterodorsal angles not produced, posterior lateral margins broadly sinuate ( Fig. 2F View Fig ); in posterior view with opening longer than wide, lateral margin thick and not well defined, medioventral process absent ( Fig. 2G View Fig ). Genital styles ( Fig. 2H–J View Fig ) long, reaching basal anal segment, apical part distinctly curved inward, outer apical angle rounded and protruding slightly dorsad, inner apical angle quadrate, with inner edge angularly directed dorsally in lateral view. Aedeagus ( Fig. 2K–M View Fig ) long, tubular, with distinct phallotheca, with basal part lying between two valvular processes of phallotheca, deflecting leftward, apical part recurved downward and reaching ⅔ of phallotheca. Phallotheca almost reaching base of genital styles, apical part warping dorsad, basal part stout, with two valvular processes, in dorsal view with a large and a small round valvular processes, tapering from ½ to apex, in right view with three processes near base.
Host plant
Bambusoideae.
Distribution
India (Karnataka).
Remarks
This species is similar to A. obflexa Guo & Liang, 2005 in having a similar shape of the frons, in the cylindrical antennae, in the relatively larger pronotum, in the gibbous mesonotum, strongly sloping laterally and posteriorly, and in the shape of the forewing. However, it can be distinguished from the latter by the following features: (1) frons in profile ( Figs 1I View Fig , 2B View Fig ) not inclined anteriorly (vs frons in profile ( Figs 3I View Fig , 4B View Fig ) inclined anteriorly in A. obflexa ); (2) clypeus in profile ( Figs 1I View Fig , 2B View Fig ) bent at obtuse angle to frons, with median carina present (vs clypeus in profile ( Figs 3I View Fig , 4B View Fig ) bent at right angle to frons, with median carina obsolete in A. obflexa ); (3) spinal formula of hind tibia 5-7-5 (vs spinal formula of hind tibia 5-8- 5 in A. obflexa ); (4) anal segment of male ( Fig. 2E View Fig ) with lateroapical angles without spinous process (vs anal segment of male ( Fig. 4E View Fig ) with lateroapical angles produced into stout spinous process caudad in A. obflexa ); (5) genital styles ( Fig. 2H–J View Fig ) without angled process medioventrally, inner apical angle not bifurcate (vs genital styles ( Fig. 4I–J View Fig ) with an angled process medioventrally, inner apical angle bifurcate in A. obflexa ).
This species is also similar to A. verrucosa Fennah, 1956 in having a similar shape of the frons, in the cylindrical antennae, in the relatively larger pronotum, in the gibbous mesonotum, strongly sloping laterally and posteriorly, and in the shape and similar color of the forewing. However, it can be distinguished from the latter by the following features: (1) frons in profile ( Figs 1I View Fig , 2B View Fig ) not inclined anteriorly (vs frons in profile ( Figs 5I View Fig , 6B View Fig ) inclined anteriorly in A. obflexa ); (2) clypeus in profile ( Figs 1I View Fig , 2B View Fig ) bent at obtuse angle to frons, with median carina present (vs clypeus in profile ( Figs 5I View Fig , 6B View Fig ) bent at right angle to frons, with median carina obsolete in A. verrucosa ); (3) spinal formula of hind tibia 5-7-5 (vs spinal formula of hind tibia 5-8-5 or 5-9- 5 in A. verrucosa ); (4) genital styles ( Fig. 2H–J View Fig ) with inner apical angle not bifurcate (vs genital styles ( Fig. 6H–I View Fig ) with inner apical angle bifurcate in A. obflexa ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |