Antipus rufus rufus DeGeer, 1778
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2019.499 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A50C1B67-2795-45D2-86EE-0A60637A4D1D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10410347 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E452AB6B-FFD3-FC72-0F4B-4F79286BF9B1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Antipus rufus rufus DeGeer, 1778 |
status |
|
Antipus rufus rufus DeGeer, 1778
Fig. 1 View Fig
Antipus rufus DeGeer, 1778: 659 (original description).
Cryptocephalus maxillosus Fabricius, 1781: 139 (original description).
Clytra capensis Olivier, 1808: 853 (original description) (not examined).
Clythra unipunctata Thunberg, 1821: 183 (original description) (not examined).
Clythra octonotata Thunberg, 1821: 184 (original description).
Micropyga transvalense Jacoby, 1903: 93 (original description) (not examined).
Type localities
Antipus rufus : “Cap”. Cryptocephalus maxillosus : “Cap. bon. sp.”. Clytra capensis : “cap de Bonne-Espérance”. Clythra unipunctata : “Cap” [= from the publication title]. Clythra octonotata : “Cap” [= from the publication title]. Micropyga transvalense : “Transvaal”.
Material examined
Syntypes
SOUTH AFRICA • 1 ♂; “Sp. [w, h] // Antipus rufus . VII p 659 [box label common for both specimens, w, h]”; NHRS • 1 ♂, without any labels; NHRS .
Additional material
SOUTH AFRICA • 1 ♂, syntype of Cryptocephalus maxillosus ; “ Cryp. Maxillosus / Fabr. Sp. Ins. n. 11 [w, h]”; BMNH – Banks coll. • 1 ♀, syntype of Clythra octonotata ; “Uppsala Univ. Zool. Mus. / Thunbergsaml. nr. 8212 / Clythra octonotata / Cap. TYP [r, p] // 8-notata. / α / Cap. 23 [box label, w, h]”; UUZM • 1 ♀ (almost destroyed), syntype of Clythra octonotata ; “Uppsala Univ. Zool. Mus. / Thunbergsaml. nr. 8213 / Clythra octonontata / Cap. TYP [r, p] // 8-notata. / β / Cap. 24 [box label, w, h]”; UUZM • 1 ♀, syntype of Clythra octonotata ; “Uppsala Univ. Zool. Mus. / Thunbergsaml. nr. 15384 / Clythra octonotata / TYP [r, p] // 8-notata. / 110x [box label, w, h]”; UUZM .
Distribution
Republic of South Africa ( RSA).
Comments
Thunberg (1821) accompanied the name Clythra unipunctata with a very short description and a reference to Cryptocephalus maxillosus Fabricius, 1781 . I can only speculate whether Thunberg wanted to replace the older name or not. However, because there is no explicit intention of replacement, I treat Clythra unipunctata as a validly described species conspecific with Cryptocephalus maxillosus . In UUZM, no type specimens of Clythra unipunctata were traced.
In the same paper, Thunberg (1821) described Clythra octonotata . In UUZM three female syntypes are deposited (one almost destroyed). The syntypes belong to a colour aberration with black spots on elytra often occurring in females of Antipus rufus rufus . Lacordaire (1848) correctly listed Clythra octonotata under his variety B of Antipus rufus rufus . Here I confirm Clythra octonotata as a synonym of Antipus rufus rufus .
The genus Antipus DeGeer, 1778 includes three species: A. nasicornis Medvedev, 2008 ( Congo) , A. signatifera ( Lacordaire, 1848) ( RSA) and the widely distributed Antipus rufus DeGeer, 1778 forming three subspecies ( Antipus r. rufus ; Antipus r. cornuta Medvedev, 1993; Antipus r. haefligeri (Weise, 1907)). The genus requires a modern taxonomic revision.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Antipus rufus rufus DeGeer, 1778
Bezděk, Jan 2019 |
Micropyga transvalense
Jacoby M. 1903: 93 |
Clythra unipunctata
Thunberg C. P. 1821: 183 |
Clythra octonotata
Thunberg C. P. 1821: 184 |
Clytra capensis
Olivier A. G. 1808: 853 |
Cryptocephalus maxillosus
Fabricius J. C. 1781: 139 |
Antipus rufus
DeGeer C. 1778: 659 |