Anthophora (Micranthophora) caudata, Orr & Pitts & Griswold, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4511.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:754B8A42-E269-42B5-92EB-043F3BEAA055 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3798700 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE87C1-D830-D956-EDE4-4395E405938E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Anthophora (Micranthophora) caudata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Anthophora (Micranthophora) caudata View in CoL , SP. NOV.
( Figs. 33B View FIGURE 33 , 39C View FIGURE 39 , 44C View FIGURE 44 , 49C View FIGURE 49 , 54C View FIGURE 54 , 59C View FIGURE 59 , 64C View FIGURE 64 , 69C View FIGURE 69 , 74C View FIGURE 74 )
Anthophora (Micranthophora) caudata (holotype: ♂; Cuatro Cienegas Nat’l Preserve, Site E2, ~ 8 km SE of Cuatro, Coahuila, Mexico; coll. D.C. Lightfoot et al., 19 Sep. 2011; BBSL, BBSLID99013 / HOLO107).
Verbatim: “ Mexico: Coahuila, Cuatro Cienegas Nat’l Preserve 19 IX 2011 26.91021°N 102.03642°W D.C. Lightfoot et al., colrs” “Site E2 ~8 Km Se of Cuatro saline gypsum marsh general collecting” “ HOLOTYPE Anthophora caudata male TYPE Orr BBSLID99013” “ Anthophora sp. male Det. K. R. Wetherill 2011.”
Diagnosis. Males are immediately recognizable by T7’s unusually long medial projections, which dwarf the blunt lateral projections ( Fig. 59C View FIGURE 59 ). Males may be otherwise determined by the following character combination: galea clearly reaching well beyond the foretrochanter in repose; clypeus with strong inverted-T maculation ( Fig. 49C View FIGURE 49 ); supraclypeal maculation transverse, often weak; scutum shiny, with impunctate areas; basitibial plate absent; terga covered in appressed white setae. Females may be determined by the following character combination: galea with long setae curved toward tip ( Fig. 33B View FIGURE 33 ); mandible with inferior tooth moderate to large, vaguely triangular, angled off main blade ( Fig. 39C View FIGURE 39 ); supraclypeus amorphously maculated; terga covered with appressed, white setae; and anal fimbria light, yellow to orange.
Male description. Head: Facial maculations richly yellow. Galea reaching well past foretrochanter in repose; amber to brown; weakly tessellate to smooth and shiny, with strong reflections. Mandible with inferior tooth large and triangular, strongly angled off main blade; maculated from base to near distal attachment of inferior tooth ( Fig. 49C View FIGURE 49 ). Labral rim tridentate; fully maculated. Clypeal maculation an inverted-T, present in lower half or more with narrow medial line extending upward, reaching lateral sides, and most often reaching top medially ( Fig. 49C View FIGURE 49 ); punctation nearly absent near rim but much denser above bottom third of clypeal height. Paraocular area immaculate. Supraclypeal area maculated; transverse, sometimes pointed above. Scape maculated; fully along length and width below. Mesosoma: Scutum shiny; with impunctate areas, sometimes weak. Tegula transparent to translucent, yellow to brown. Basitibial plate absent. Metasoma: T1–T6 covered in appressed setae. Terga smooth and shiny between punctures, with strong reflections; apparent through appressed setae. Tergal rims fully transparent or nearly so, tan at most. Male T7 ( Fig. 59C View FIGURE 59 ) without medial longitudinal carina, setae often obscuring area; lateral projections weakly recurved, blunt flanges; medial projections extremely long, thin, slightly directed literally. Male S5 ( Fig. 38A View FIGURE 38 ) setal arrangement unremarkable, without large, distinctive patches, at most longer along rim. Male S6 resembling Fig. 38B View FIGURE 38 , clearly medially emarginate with slight transparent integumental infill near base, but with slight transparent bump at center of medial emargination, with stronger setal tuft there. Male S7 ( Fig. 64C View FIGURE 64 ) with setae absent or nearly so around midpoint of length; widening from midpoint to tip, apical half widest near rounded lateral tips; apical half vaguely trapezoidal, rim rounded outward, with narrow medial emargination. Male S8 ( Fig. 69C View FIGURE 69 ) lateral projections reduced but distinct; medial projection narrowing to tip, apically emarginate. Male genital capsule ( Fig. 74C View FIGURE 74 ) with outer corners, where gonocoxite tips curve inward, marked by obvious flange of about 90 degrees or greater, best seen in profile; from corner to apex, in profile, gonocoxite relatively unmodified, concave or straight; tip, in profile, pointed and strongly curved ventrally; gonostylus tip position slightly to significantly exceeding that of gonocoxite, measured from above along primary axis of latter. Pubescence: See Fig. 54C View FIGURE 54 . Appears light gray overall. All white, except orange on leg inner surfaces and often sterna.
Female similar to male, except: Head: Galea medium to dark brown; more often weakly to moderately tessellate; with sparse but distinct, curved setae over the galeal surface, pointing toward galeal tip ( Fig. 33B View FIGURE 33 ). Labral rim rounded. Supraclypeal area rarely immaculate; usually more amorphous. Scape immaculate. Mesosoma: Scutum uncommonly without impunctate areas. Midtibial spur apically curved; tan to orange. Basitibial plate circular distally, teardropped overall. Metasoma: T1–T4 covered in appressed setae; T5 with extensive appressed setae. T4 impunctate rim of short length medially, weakly expanded medially. Anal fimbria triangular, filling roughly third or slightly more of T5 length medially. Pubescence: See Fig. 44C View FIGURE 44 . Hindbasitarsal brush medium to dark brown; anal fimbria yellow to orange.
Distribution. See Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 . Present in USA: New Mexico, Texas, possibly Arizona; Mexico: Coahuila, likely Chihuahua, possibly Durango. Found almost exclusively in Chihuahuan Desert. Ecoregional habitance is as follows, based on 105 specimen records: 4 ecoregions total: Chihuahuan Desert (91=86.7%), Sierra Madre Oriental pine-oak forests (10=9.5%), Western short grasslands (3=2.9%), Colorado Plateau shrublands (1≤1%).
Phenology. Recorded from April–September, primarily May and August–September, few in July. Specimens collected from June and September in same site/year suggest bivoltinism; more records needed to draw rigorous conclusions.
Nesting biology. Unknown.
Floral specialization. Likely generalist with preference for Boraginaceae and Asteraceae , possibly also Onagraceae . Boraginaceae use suggested by appreciable proportions present in 8/15 pollen views, half of which were purely Boraginaceae pollen, and modified pollen-gathering galeal setae generally associated with Boraginaceae use ( Fig. 33b View FIGURE 33 ). However, two pollen views revealed pure Asteraceae loads and one pure Onagraceae load. Remaining four pollen loads contain variably proportioned mixes of Asteraceae , Boraginaceae , Onagraceae , and at least two unidentified types. Primary recorded visits by 38 females include: Family Boraginaceae (61%), Asteraceae (13%), Bignoniaceae (11%); Genus Nama (47%); Species Nama cornosum (34%), Chilopsis linearis (11%). 58 total floral records from 14 families include: Aizoaceae (1 ♀): Sesuvium portulacastrum 1 ♀, Asteraceae (5 ♂ 5 ♀): Aster sp. 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Asteraceae sp. 1 ♀, Baccharis neglecta 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Dyssodia sp. 1 ♀, Isocoma coronopifolia 1 ♀, Machaeranthera sp. 1 ♂, Varilla sp. 1 ♂, Xanthisma sp. 1 ♂, Bignoniaceae (2 ♂ 4 ♀): Chilopsis linearis 2 ♂ 4 ♀, Boraginaceae (6 ♂ 23 ♀): Nama carnosum 13 ♀, Nama havardii 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Nama hispidum 1 ♂ 2 ♀, Nama sp. 2 ♂ 2 ♀, Phacelia integrifolia 2 ♂ 2 ♀, Tiquilia gossypina 2 ♀, Tiquilia hispidissima 1 ♀, Cucurbitaceae (1 ♂): Ibervillea tenuisecta 1 ♂, Fabaceae (1 ♂): Prosopis glandulosa 1 ♂, Loasaceae (5 ♂ 1 ♀): Petalonyx sp. 5 ♂ 1 ♀, Onagraceae (2 ♀): Calylophus hartwegii 2 ♀, Polygonaceae (2 ♀): Eriogonum gypsophilum 2 ♀.
Etymology. The exceptionally long medial pair of projections on the male T7 has earned this species the name caudata (“tailed”). Note that this species is called “ aff. mortuaria ” on determination labels prior to the choice of this name. The epithet is an adjective in the nominative singular.
Paratypes: USA: NEW MEXICO: Eddy County: Seven Rivers , 3 km S: 1 ♀, 16 May 1989, T. L. Griswold ; 1 ♂ 3 ♀, 3 Sep 1990, T.L. Griswold ; Whites City , 10 km SSW: 8 ♀, 12 May 1989, T. L. Griswold ; Otero County: White Sands National Monument site A2 ~ 9 km SW of field station gypsum dunes/interdune flats: 1 ♀, 26 Aug 2011, K. Wetherill ; TEXAS: Brewster County: Old Terlingua , 1 mi E: 1 ♂ 1 ♀, 13 Jun 2004, J.L. Neff ( CTMI) ; Terlingua Creek , 32 km N Study Butte: 1 ♀, 16 Apr 1986, R. T. Griswold ; 2 ♂, 16 Apr 1986, T.L. Griswold ; Crane County: Crane , 15 mi W: 1 ♀, 20 May 2006, J.L. Neff ( CTMI) ; Culberson County: Linda Lake Salt Basin, Along Rd to dune area: 1 ♀, 22 Aug 2010, T. L. Griswold ; Rd 1108 and 652, 4.8 mi SE: 1 ♂, 14 Jun 2005, J.L. Neff, A. Hook ( CTMI) ; Reeves co line on hwy 652, 23.4 mi W: 1 ♀, 12 Jun 2004, J.L. Neff ( CTMI) ; Ward County: Monahans Sandhills st pk CG area: 1 ♂, 13 Jun 1998, E.B. Dopman, C. R. Nelson ( CTMI) .
Other specimens examined: MEXICO: Coahuila de Zaragoza: Cuatro-Cienegas Nat'l Preserve; Site B3 ~ 19.43km sw of Cuatro gypsum dunes pedestals: 5 ♂ 1 ♀, 20 Sep 2011, D.C. Lightfoot; Cuatro-Cienegas Nat'l Preserve; Site D1 ~ 8km se of Cuatro gypsum flat: 1 ♀, 16 May 2010, K. Wetherill; 2 ♀, 27 Jun 2011, D.C. Lightfoot; Cuatro-Cienegas Prot. Area; Site B1 ~ 19km sw of Cuatrocienegas gypsum dunes: 2 ♂, 18 May 2010, D.C. Lightfoot, K. Wetherill; 1 ♂ 1 ♂, 18 May 2010, K. Wetherill; Cuatro-Cienegas Prot. Area; Site B2 ~ 20km sw of Cuatrocienegas vegetated gypsum dunes: 1 ♂ 1 ♂, 24 Jul 2010, K. Wetherill; 2 ♂ 3 ♀, 22 Jun 2011, D.C. Lightfoot; 1 ♂, 20 Sep 2011, D.C. Lightfoot; Cuatro-Cienegas Prot. Area; Site E2; ~ 8 km SE of Cuatrocienegas; saline gypsum marsh: 2 ♂, 16 May 2010, K. Wetherill; 1 ♂, 26 May 2011, K. Wetherill; 2 ♀, 22 Aug 2011, K. Wetherill; 1 ♂ 2 ♂, 19 Sep 2011, D.C. Lightfoot; Cuatro-Cienegas Prot. Area; Site E3; ~ 13 km SE Cuatrocienegas; gypsum flat with sinkholes: 1 ♀, 19 Sep 2011, D.C. Lightfoot; Cuatro-Cienegas Prot. Area; Site F3 ~ 16km se of Cuatrocienegas gypsum outcrop: 2 ♂, 15 May 2010, K. Wetherill; Cuatro-Cienegas Prot. Area; Site F4; ~ 18 km E Cuatrocienegas; gypsum flat: 1 ♂, 14 May 2010, K. Wetherill; 1 ♂, 24 Jun 2011, D.C. Lightfoot. USA: NEW MEXICO: Chaves County: Bitter Lake NWR: 1 ♀, 14 May 1995, R.L. Minckley; Dona Ana County: White Sands National Monument; site A6; 3.7 km E of Lake Lucero on gypsum dunes: 1 ♀ 5 ♀, 6 Aug 2010, K. Wetherill; 5 ♀ 1 ♀, 26 Aug 2011, K. Wetherill; Eddy County: Bottomless Lakes, 2.5km S: 1 ♀, 29 Aug 1972, Eickwort; Carlsbad Caverns, 12 mi SW: 2 ♀, 30 Aug 1940, H.G. Rodeck; Seven Rivers, 3 km S: 1 ♀, 12 May 1989, T.L. Griswold; Otero County: White Sands Monument area: 1 ♀, 28 May 2011, K. Wetherill; White Sands National Monument: 1 ♀, 27 Aug 1973, G.C. Eickwort; White Sands National Monument; site A2 ~ 9 km SW of Visitors center: 1 ♀, 6 Aug 2010, D.C. Lightfoot; White Sands Natl Monument, Site C1: 1 ♀, 28 May 2011, K. Wetherill; Socorro County: Sevilleta NWR-G: 1 ♂, 16 Jul 2007, K. Wetherill; TEXAS: Crane County: Crane, 15 mi W: 1 ♀, 20 May 2006, J.L. Neff.
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
CG |
Embrapa Collection of Fungi of Invertebrates |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |