Amphichroum sp.
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5082.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F4F057C6-3207-4430-A88E-4F4513D803C7 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5783651 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/397C5D1D-FFC4-FFD2-FF6F-B1A4FE71FE60 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Amphichroum sp. |
| status |
|
Material studied: 3 ♀♀: ‘Pindar V. Almora U.P., 8-11,000ft. July7 1920. H.G.C.’, 3614’, ‘ Amphichroum pindarense ’, ‘not pindarense P.M. Hammond det. 1980’ ( BMNH); 1 ♂: ‘Pindar Valley, 8-11,000ft. Kumaon. H.G.C.’ ( BMNH); 1 ♀: ‘Pindar Valley HGC’ ( BMNH).
Remarks. Regarding the coloration, body size and microsculpture of the forebody, these specimens are somewhat similar to A. pindarense , but differby the shorter pronotum and slightly longer elytra. Unfortunately, the aedeagus in the male is missing.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |