Toxoplasma gondii subsp. detection
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.09.009 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FC4D87A3-FFCF-FFA8-1B62-F9BFFCC1CED7 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Toxoplasma gondii subsp. detection |
status |
|
3.1. Soil T. gondii detection
We were able to detect H. hammondi from both soil samples spiked with oocysts, indicating the methodology was effective at that concentration. However, the results of PCR-RFLP detection of T. gondii oocyst were not consistently positive ( Table 1). In the first test, T. gondii appeared in the positive controls (PTG strain) and in two soil samples. In the repeat experiment, an additional soil sample was T. gondii positive, and earlier positive samples were not consistently positive ( Table 1). When testing if the addition of five more grams of soil from each of the 22 samples increased oocyst detection, no positive samples were detected ( Table 2).
193
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.