Pamphilius tricolor Beneš, 1974

Shinohara, Akihiko, Kramp, Katja & Taeger, Andreas, 2022, The Pamphiliinae of the Russian Far East and Korea (Hymenoptera, Pamphiliidae), Zootaxa 5167 (1), pp. 1-251 : 73

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5167.1.1
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4C140613-04F6-4227-B084-45851F42E039
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6915782
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FB3C87F1-F238-AC4F-FF67-FE49FAA6AFCA
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Pamphilius tricolor Beneš, 1974
status

Treatment

( Figs 121 View FIGURE 121 , 122 View FIGURE 122 ) (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11405304)

Pamphilius tricolor Beneš, 1974: 301 , 313; Shinohara, 1995: 50; Zhelochovtsev & Zinovjev, 1995: 398; Shinohara & Zinovjev, 1996: 110; Shinohara, 2002b: 426; Shinohara, 2004: 263; Shinohara & Taeger, 2007: 38; Shinohara & Lelej, 2007: 936, 942; Shinohara & Hara, 2009: 295; Sundukov, 2009: 213; Taeger et al., 2010: 91; Sundukov & Lelej, 2012: 109; Sundukov, 2017: 105; Lee et al., 2019: 11 View Cited Treatment ; Shinohara, 2019: 12; Shinohara, 2020: 20, 250.

See Shinohara (1995) for more references.

Material examined. About 150 specimens, including the holotype. Ninety-six specimens are from the Russian Far East and Korea (Shinohara 1995; Shinohara & Zinovjev 1996; Shinohara & Taeger 2007; present work). New collection data: SOUTH KOREA: Gangwon-do: 1♀, Mirugam (Bukdaesa), 1300m, Odaesan Mts., 29. V.–1. VI . 1996 , J.-W. Kim ( NSMT).

Distribution. Russia (Urals, eastern Siberia, Sakha Republic, Kamchatka Kraj, Magadanskaya Oblast, Khabarovskij Kraj, Primorskij Kraj), South Korea, Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu) ( Shinohara & Taeger 2007).

Host plant. Salicaceae : Salix caprea L. ( Shinohara & Hara 2009).

Remarks. Pamphilius tricolor belongs to the P. gyllenhali subgroup of the P. histrio group ( Shinohara 2002b) and is most closely related to the European P. gyllenhali (Dahlbom, 1835) . These two allopatric species are similar morphologically, though distinguishable from each other, and share the same host plant and larval habits (Shinohara 1995; Shinohara & Hara 2009). The available COI data for the two species were retrieved as monophyletic with 100% UFBoot support, but the two species were not clearly differentiated within the clade ( Fig. 142 View FIGURES 142–143 ).