Uduba rajery, Griswold & Ubick & Ledford & Polotow, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13158554 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:74E0D22E-9890-4FF0-80AB-8FCBBA976B2F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13160601 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C756E408-406E-48B2-8ACF-6C849332AB15 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:C756E408-406E-48B2-8ACF-6C849332AB15 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Uduba rajery |
status |
sp. nov. |
Uduba rajery View in CoL , new species
Figures 8 E View FIGURE , 55 A–C View FIGURE , 56 A–F View FIGURE , Maps 9 View MAP , 19 View MAP .
Type material. Holotype male ( CASENT9026393 ) from a yellow pan trap in littoral rainforest at 20m elevation in Forêt Ambohidena , Ile Sainte Marie, Toamasina Province, Madagascar, collected 21–24 November 2005 by Brian L. Fisher et al., deposited in CAS.
Etymology. The species epithet is patronym is honor of the Malagasy musician Rajery, born Germain Randrianrisoa, who is a player of the bamboo tube zither (valiha) and who founded the modern valiha orchestra. In spite of a childhood accident that cost him the fingers of one hand he developed a unique and memorable style of playing the valiha, invented notation for this instrument, and is one of Madagascar’s finest recording artists.
Diagnosis. Uduba rajery belong to Group V, the Uduba rajery group ( Map 19 View MAP ). Males can be distinguished from those of other Uduba by the form of the male palp ( Figs. 55 A–C View FIGURE , 56 A–F View FIGURE ), with a thick, swollen VTA on the tibia, the spine-like TA3 extending through a notch at the apex of the tegulum, and the large, triangular MA: Uduba rajery may be distinguished from U. rakotozafy by having the MA apex with two spikes ( Figs. 55 C View FIGURE , 56 B, D, E View FIGURE ) ( U. rakotozafy has an apical lobe and spike, Fig. 58 A View FIGURE ). Females of Uduba rajery are unknown.
Description. Male (holotype): Total length 6.00. Markings as in Fig. 8 E View FIGURE , with a striking pattern of black legs, tan coxae and trochanters, and black lateral stripes on a tan carapace. Carapace 3.80 long, 2.60 wide, 1.60 high; clypeus 0.25 high. Eye diameters:AME, PME and PLE 0.16, ALE 0.15. Chelicerae 1.70 long; sternum 2.00 long, 1.40 wide; labium 0.90 long; palpal coxae 1.30 long. Ratios– carapace length / width = 1.46, carapace height / width = 0.62, PER / carapace width = 0.39, PER / OAL = 2.83, PER / AER = 1.28, OAL / OQL = 1.06, OQP / OQA = 1.11, clypeus height / AME = 1.56, cheliceral length / clypeus height = 6.80, sternum length / width = 1.43, palpal coxa length / width = 2.60, femur I length / carapace width = 1.23, metatarsus I length / carapace width = 1.27, femur IV length / carapace width = 1.27, cymbium length / carapace width = 0.62, cymbium length / palpal patella length = 3.20, cymbium length / palpal tibia length = 2.29, cymbium length / palpal femur length = 1.23, palpal tibia length / palpal patella length = 1.40. Cribellum divided. Spination: palpus–femur d1-0-1, patella d0-1; leg I–femur d1-1-1, p0-0-2, tibia p0-1-1-0, v2-2-2, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus p1-1-1, v2-2-2, r1-1-1; leg II–femur d1-1-1, p0-0-1, r0-0-1, tibia d0-1-1-0, p0-1-1-0, v2-2-2-2, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus p1-1-1, v2-2-3, r1-1-1; leg III–femur d1-1- 1, p0-1-1-0, r0-1-1-0, tibia d0-0-1-0, p0-1-1-0, v2-2-2, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus d0-1-0, p1-1-2, v2-2- 2, r1-1-2, tarsus v0-1-0; leg IV–femur d1-1-1, p0-0-1, r0-0-1, patella r1, tibia d0-1-0, p0-1-1-0, v2- 2-3, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus d0-1-0, p1-1-1, v2-2-2, r1-1-1. Scopulae: cymbium, apicodorsal ( Figs. 56 A, C View FIGURE ); very weak beneath all tarsi. Leg measurements: I: 3.20 + 1.40 + 3.10 + 3.30 + 2.20 = 13.20; II: 2.80 + 1.20 + 2.50 + 2.70 + 1.60 = 10.80; III: 2.40 + 1.10 + 1.60 + 2.20 + 1.20 = 8.50; IV: 3.30 + 1.20 + 2.80 + 3.60 + 1.70 = 12.60; palpus: 1.30 + 0.50 + 0.70 + NA + 1.60 = 4.10. Leg formula 1423. Male palp: palpal tibia 0.52 times cymbial length, RTA broad, very short, sharply-curved to ventrad ( Fig. 55 C View FIGURE ), RTA length 0.09 tibia length, length 0.44 times width, VTA unique, large, swollen, transversely wider than long and truncate apically ( Figs. 55 B, C View FIGURE , 56 A View FIGURE ), length 0.705 times width, length 0.44 tibia width; tibia lacking stout spines; tegulum convex, without ridge, tegulum length 0.98 times width; TA1 serrate medially and with pointed apex, extends distad of tegulum apex, TA1 extends slightly past TA3 apex; TA3 elongate with recurved apex extending through notch at tegular anterior margin ( Figs. 56 B, F View FIGURE ), TA3 extends apicad of TA2 by 1.25 tegulum length, TA2 a mound partly forming the notch from which the TA3 apex emerges and partially covering mesal margin of MA ( Figs. 55 B View FIGURE , 56 B, E View FIGURE ); MA origin at 0.26 times tegulum length, MA apex extends distad of tegulum apex, length (including apical processes) 2.00 times width, MA very large, length 0.81 times tegulum length, width 0.395 times tegulum width, oval with a swollen, rounded base and with retrolateral and prolateral acutely-pointed apical projections ( Fig. 55 B View FIGURE , 56 D, E View FIGURE ); conductor fan entire. Female: Unknown.
Variation. Unknown: the species Uduba rajery is only known from one male, the holotype.
Material examined. MADAGASCAR: Toamasina Province: Ile Sainte Marie, Forêt Ambohidena , 22.8 km 44°NW Ambodifotatra, 16°49ʹ28ʺS, 49°57ʹ51ʺE, elev. 20m, yellow pan trap, littoral rainforest, 21–24 November 2005, B. L. Fisher et al. [BLF12839] (Holotype, CASENT9026393 , 1♂, CAS) GoogleMaps .
Natural history. The lone specimen of Uduba rajery was collected in littoral rainforest. Like all adult male Uduba it was wandering when trapped. The vestige of a divided cribellum on the male suggests that U. rajery females deploy cribellate sticky silk, but we know nothing of their behavior.
Distribution. Uduba rajery is known only from the type locality on Ile Sainte Marie, off the northeast coast of Madagascar ( Maps 9 View MAP , 19 View MAP ).
CAS |
California Academy of Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.