Pardoteleia Kozlov & Lê, 1988
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4158.4.10 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:75CB7C1C-9E32-4E64-B2F1-DCF8876FD141 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6057881 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F9652450-3A2B-FFA4-FF79-3EB8C5596CEC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pardoteleia Kozlov & Lê, 1988 |
status |
|
Pardoteleia Kozlov & Lê, 1988 View in CoL
Pardoteleia Kozlov & Lê, 1988: 70 View in CoL . Original description. Type: Pardoteleia prater Kozlov & Lê View in CoL , by monotypy and original designation.
Description. Body honey-brown in color; head wider than long; hyperoccipital carina absent; frontal depression absent; lateral ocelli adjacent to compound eye in females and not so in males; ocelli much larger in males than females; antenna with twelve antennomeres, clava with six clavomeres in female; radicle very long, 0.3× the length of A1; males with moniliform-filiform antenna with A2 much narrower than other antennomeres; mandible tridentate.
Netrion present; skaphion present; notauli absent; metascutellum triangular; macropterous or micropterous; if macropterous, fore wing with either one or two dark bands; postmarginalis 1.5–1.64× as long as stigmalis; stigmalis 2× as long as marginalis.
Metasoma 1.5× as long as wide; horn on T1 absent; metasomal tergites with broad dark brown markings on T2–T4; ovipositor Scelio -typ e.
Host. Not known.
Diagnosis. The genera Calotelea and Pardoteleia share several characters such as radicle long; mesoscutellum unarmed; skaphion present; metascutellum either produced into a transverse lamella or a triangular plate; fore wing with transverse bands; postmarginalis well developed, longer than stigmalis and marginalis; T3 largest segment of metasoma. However, Calotelea differs from Pardoteleia in having a distinct horn on T 1 in females while the horn is absent in Pardoteleia . Venation on forewing differs between these two genera; in Pardoteleia length of postmarginalis>stigmalis>marginalis while in Calotelea marginalis is almost as long as stigmalis ( Popovici, 2013). Generally Calotelea are very slender and gracile with an elongate and spindle-shaped metasoma while in Pardoteleia the metasoma is oval, around 1.5× as long as wide. The males of Pardoteleia and Calotelea can be distinguished using antennal characters and shape of the body. Pardoteleia has moniliform-filiform antenna and oval body where body length to width ratio is around 1.5 whereas in Calotelea the antenna is filiform and has a fusiform body. Venation mentioned for the females is also applicable for the males.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Pardoteleia Kozlov & Lê, 1988
Kamalanathan, Veenakumari & Mohanraj, Prashanth 2016 |
Pardoteleia Kozlov & Lê, 1988 : 70
Kozlov 1988: 70 |