Anaphes, Haliday, 1833
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5557.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6CE8CC38-F965-4404-ACCD-6D0DBDB942FB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14597053 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F879DB6E-991B-FFCE-FF35-FD5BFD11F8A7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Anaphes |
status |
|
ANAPHES Haliday, 1833 View in CoL
( Figs 33–39 View FIGURES 33–35 View FIGURES 36, 37 View FIGURES 38, 39 )
Anaphes Haliday, 1833a: 268 View in CoL , 1833b: 346. Type species: Anaphes fuscipennis Haliday, 1833 View in CoL , by designation under the plenary powers of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 2017: 122 ( ICZN 2017). See Huber et al. (2020) for generic synonyms and their type species.
Diagnosis. Body almost always uniformly black or dark brown; face without subantennal sulci and toruli less than their height from transverse trabecula ( Fig. 33a View FIGURES 33–35 ); antenna with fu 1 shorter than each remaining segment and clava 1- ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 33–35 ) or 2-segmented; fore wing with posterior margin straight to distinctly concave, with apex slightly asymmetrical, the anterior margin usually more curved than posterior margin ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 33–35 ), almost always uniformly covered with microtrichia except for two more or less distinct bare areas, the marginal and medial spaces, separated by an oblique row of microtrichia extending from just behind apex of stigmal vein towards wing apex ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 33–35 ); retinaculum with a socketed seta near apex ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 33–35 ); propodeum with median longitudinal sulcus ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 36, 37 ); petiole short, not visible ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 36, 37 ); gt 1 a thin, narrow and almost vertical panel longitudinally divided by a median sulcus ( Figs 36–38 View FIGURES 36, 37 View FIGURES 38, 39 ); ovipositor base enclosed in a membranous gastral sac sometimes projecting anteriorly ventral to mesosoma ( Figs 37 View FIGURES 36, 37 , 39 View FIGURES 38, 39 ).
Remarks. Anaphes belongs to the Anaphes group of genera, a rather poorly defined group containing one other genus, Erythmelus . It differs from Erythmelus in having mandibles with 3 distinct teeth that cross over each other when closed. The most well-known species of fairyfly in the Neotropical region is probably Anaphes nitens (Girault) . Before even being identified to genus and species, A. nitens was imported from South Africa into Argentina ( Marelli 1928) and Brazil (Ribeiro et al. 2023) to control an introduced Gonipterus sp. ( Curculionidae ) on Eucalyptus spp. From there it spread to other countries in South America. An additional Australian species of Anaphes , A. tasmania Huber & Prinsloo , was released but so far failed to become established ( Ide et al. 2013a) and A. inexpectatus Huber & Prinsloo was being considered for introduction into Brazil ( Wilcken et al. 2018) and was introduced into Colombia ( Cardeño, 2019). Whether it is successfully established is unknown but it is included here in case its introduction is eventually shown to be successful. Gavio et al. (2024) recorded specimens of an unidntified species from an unknown host in the thalli of a red alga in the marine intertidal zone of a mangrove forest.
Neotropical hosts. Coleoptera : Curculionidae .
Important reference. Huber & Thuróczy (2018).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Anaphes
Huber, John T., Read, Jennifer D. & Triapitsyn, Serguei V. 2024 |
Anaphes
Haliday 2017: 122 |
Haliday, A. H. 1833: 268 |
Haliday, A. H. 1833: 346 |