Pimoa bomi Zhang & Li, 2021
|
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1029.64080 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E4AB7004-4633-4051-97DF-E02F1F68CCC4 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0DF3A574-A35C-452B-8002-A756A7D34BC9 |
|
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:0DF3A574-A35C-452B-8002-A756A7D34BC9 |
|
treatment provided by |
|
|
scientific name |
Pimoa bomi Zhang & Li |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Pimoa bomi Zhang & Li sp. nov. Figures 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 , 54 View Figure 54 , 59 View Figure 59
Type material.
Holotype: ♂ (IZCAS-Ar41925), China, Tibet, Nyingchi, Bomi County, Karlung Village, 30.04°N, 95.56°E, ca. 3147 m, 26.VII.2019, X. Zhang, Z. Bai and J. Liu leg. Paratypes: 1♂2♀ (IZCAS-Ar41926-Ar41928), same data as holotype.
Etymology.
The specific name is a noun in apposition taken from the type locality.
Diagnosis.
The male of Pimoa bomi sp. nov. resembles those of P. gyara sp. nov. (Figs 13A, B View Figure 13 , 54D View Figure 54 ), P. nyingchi Zhang & Li, 2020 (see Zhang et al. 2020: 91, fig. 8A-C), and P. reniformis Xu & Li, 2007 (see Xu and Li 2007: 493, figs 36-41) but can be distinguished by the short and broad cymbial denticulate process (Fig. 54B View Figure 54 ) (vs. narrow and distally curved in P. gyara sp. nov., short, distally wide, and bent inward in P. nyingchi , and robust, broad, and distally curved in P. reniformis ), and additionally from P. gyara sp. nov. and P. nyingchi by the wide, V-shaped pimoid cymbial sclerite (Fig. 54B View Figure 54 ) (vs. narrow and U-shaped in P. gyara sp. nov. and narrow in P. nyingchi ). The female of P. bomi sp. nov. also resembles those of P. nyingchi (see Zhang et al. 2020: 91, fig. 9A-D) and P. reniformis (see Xu and Li 2007: 493, figs 42-47) but can be distinguished from P. nyingchi by the distally blunt dorsal plate (Fig. 4B View Figure 4 ) (vs. pointed) and from P. reniformis by the round spermathecae (Fig. 4A View Figure 4 ) (vs. bean-shaped).
Description.
Male (holotype): Total length 7.17. Carapace 3.76 long, 3.40 wide. Abdomen 3.41 long, 2.96 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.22, ALE 0.17, PME 0.17, PLE 0.18; AME-AME 0.15, AME-ALE 0.15, PME-PME 0.16, PME-PLE 0.22. Leg measurements: I: 29.04 (8.02, 9.06, 8.56, 3.40); II: 25.64 (7.08, 8.19, 7.56, 2.81); III: 16.29 (5.00, 5.16, 4.63, 1.50); IV: 21.47 (6.09, 6.88, 6.44, 2.06). Habitus as in Fig. 4E View Figure 4 . Carapace yellowish with black lateral margins; thoracic fovea and radial grooves distinct; sternum brownish. Abdomen black with yellowish transverse chevrons. Legs brownish with black annulations, especially distinct on legs III and IV. Palp (Figs 3A, B View Figure 3 , 54B View Figure 54 ): patella short, subequal to tibial length, with one retrolateral macroseta; tibia short, ca. 1/3 of cymbial length, with several macrosetae and a dorsal process; paracymbium short, ca. 1/4 of cymbial length, finger shaped; pimoid cymbial sclerite V-shaped, ca. 1/3 of cymbial length; cymbial denticulate process short and broad, with more than 25 cuspules; median apophysis slender; conductor distinct; pimoid embolic process length subequal to embolus; embolus beginning at the 4:00 o’clock position; embolic tooth absent.
Female (paratype): Total length 8.20. Carapace 3.88 long, 3.48 wide. Abdomen 4.32 long, 3.20 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.24, ALE 0.25, PME 0.20, PLE 0.22; AME-AME 0.15, AME-ALE 0.19, PME-PME 0.20, PME-PLE 0.24. Leg measurements: I: 25.63 (7.25, 8.78, 6.72, 2.88); II: 21.19 (6.19, 7.22, 5.47, 2.31); III: 15.00 (4.84, 4.85, 3.72, 1.59); IV: 18.60 (5.72, 6.47, 4.53, 1.88). Habitus as in Fig. 4F, G View Figure 4 . Carapace yellowish with black lateral margins; thoracic fovea and radial grooves distinct; sternum brownish. Abdomen black with yellowish transverse chevrons. Legs brownish with black annulations. Epigyne (Fig. 4A-D View Figure 4 ): triangular; ventral plate broad, width subequal to length; dorsal plate tongue shaped; copulatory openings distinct; spermathecae nearly oval, unseparated; fertilization ducts yellowish, medially oriented.
Distribution.
Known only from the type locality, Tibet, China (Fig. 59 View Figure 59 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.