Pomphorhynchus tereticollis (Rudolphi, 1809)

Reier, Susanne, Sattmann, Helmut, Schwaha, Thomas, Harl, Josef, Konecny, Robert & Haring, Elisabeth, 2019, An integrative taxonomic approach to reveal the status of the genus Pomphorhynchus Monticelli, 1905 (Acanthocephala: Pomphorhynchidae) in Austria, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 8, pp. 145-155 : 149-150

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.01.009

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F63C879D-FF83-FFF4-FCA6-8353FDB57893

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Pomphorhynchus tereticollis
status

 

3.1.2. Pomphorhynchus tereticollis View in CoL

Eight juvenile specimens obtained from different fish species in Styria ( Table 1) were assigned to the species P. tereticollis . Since Špakulová et al. (2011) provided data of juvenile specimens of the subadults differed only in trunk size, the remaining measurements were combined for both life stages. Averaged measurements are given in parentheses .

Measurements are in µm unless otherwise stated.

*not present in every specimen.

original Rudolphi type material in their re-description of P. tereticollis , we were able to compare our results even though we only had juvenile material at hand. The assignment was not possible with conventional light microscopy as the extensions on the basal hooks of the proboscis were not visible after fixation. Subsequently, confocal laser scans were performed, which visualized the species-specific extensions on the basal hooks and showed the posterior branching of the basal hook roots ( Fig. 2 A, Fig. S1). Remarkably, this species was the only representative of the genus whose hooks were autofluorescent. Therefore, for a better comparability with the other two species, we performed a 3- D reconstruction of a hook row of the sectioned proboscis ( Fig. 2 D). This method also showed the extensions on the basal hooks with exception of basal hook no. 10 for which it was not possible to depict the extension in the general view ( Fig. 2 D). However, the extensions of these last hooks are visible in Fig. 2 A and Fig. S1. The examined specimen had 16 longitudinal rows of hooks on the proboscis. The proboscis had an ovoid shape armed with ten hooks per row. The five anterior hooks were stout while the four basal hooks were smaller. Last circle of basal hooks was located on the anterior part of the bulb, a species-specific trait known for P. tereticollis ( Špakulová et al., 2011) .

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF