Cladiopsocus tukunare, Obando & García Aldrete & Carrejo, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4378.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0FAAA8FA-83EC-404E-9C44-6ED1355B7FF7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5959364 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F41EAC0D-FFDC-0A03-0F9F-F8BCEED1F9ED |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cladiopsocus tukunare |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cladiopsocus tukunare n. sp.
( Figs 90–102 View FIGURES 90–96 View FIGURES 97–102 )
Diagnosis. Belonging in species group “2”, subgroup 4, in the classification of Eertmoed (1986), but the females do not present the subgenital plaque tri-lobed. Males and females with second and third tarsomeres fused, paraproct tubercle reduced; wings hyaline, without spots and vein s tubs as in C. domesticus (New) , C. iscuande n. sp., C. pancheorum n. sp., and C. altamiraensis n. sp. Differing from them in that the phallosome lacks a median posterior tongue and the paraproctal prong is small and tapered ( Fig. 94 View FIGURES 90–96 ). The female has the lateral lobes of the gonapophyses large and elongate; spermathecal plate piriform, similar to those in C. distinctus Eertmoed and C. clarus Eertmoed.
Male. Color. Head ( Fig. 92 View FIGURES 90–96 ) brown, vertex, front and postclypeus dark brown; anteclypeus, labrum, mandibles, labium and maxilla pale brown. Compound eyes dark brown, ocelli hyaline, in a dark brown area. Antennae and maxillary palps pale brown. Pro- and metanotum pale brown, mesonotum brown, thoracic pleura and legs pale brown, tibiae and tarsi darker. Forewing membrane hyaline ( Fig. 90 View FIGURES 90–96 ); veins pale brown, without brown spots along the veins and at wing margin. Hindwings hyaline, without spots ( Fig. 91 View FIGURES 90–96 ). Abdomen brown, abdominal segmental rings pale brown, clunium and hypandrium pale brown, clunium with narrow anterior border dark brown; epiproct and paraproct pale brown, paraprocts darker proximally.
Morphology. As in diagnosis plus the following: head vertex emarginate, almost at the same level of the upper margin of the compound eyes ( Fig. 92 View FIGURES 90–96 ); these large, with interommatidial setae, D is 0.54 the length of the head in front view. Forewings ( Fig. 90 View FIGURES 90–96 ); membrane pterostigma with setae, without spur veins. Hypandrium semioval, broad, posterior margin emarginate, with medium sized setae and macrosetae ( Fig. 93 View FIGURES 90–96 ). Phallosome elongate, wide distally, external parameres rounded laterally ( Fig. 94 View FIGURES 90–96 ); endophallic lobes broad, rounded apically, touching each other along the midline, internal parameres narrow and united posteriorly. Epiproct irregularly polygonal ( Fig. 95 View FIGURES 90–96 ), slightly angulate posteriorly, with three macrosetae mesally, posterior setal field as illustrated. Paraprocts ( Fig. 96 View FIGURES 90–96 ) with medium sized setae and macrosetae on long, stout mesal process as illustrated; mesal prong stout, little sclerotized; sensory fields with 15 trichobothria on basal rosettes.
Measurements. FW: 2300, HW: 1725, F: 530, T: 935, t1: 360, t2: 97, ctt1: 23, f1: 350, f2: 260, f3: 232, f4: 190, f5: 130, f6: 130, f7: 110, f8: 90, f9: 90, f10: 78, f11: 52, Mx4:160, IO: 170, D: 322, d: 220, IO/d: 0.77, PO: 0.68.
Female. Color. Essentially as in the male; forewings hyaline, without spots as in the males ( Fig. 97 View FIGURES 97–102 ). Subgenital plate, epiproct, paraprocts and gonapophyses pale brown.
Morphology. As in diagnosis, plus the following: Head ( Fig. 99 View FIGURES 97–102 ) with upper border of the compound eyes below the level of the vertex, compound eyes smaller than in the males, with interommatidial setae, D is 0.43 the length of the head in front view, narrower than the interocular distance; forewings as in the male. Subgenital plate broadly trapeziform, with abundant setae ( Fig. 100 View FIGURES 97–102 ). Gonapophyses ( Fig. 101 View FIGURES 97–102 ), slender, curved, with macrosetae and abundant setae distally; v2 +3 with a row of ten macrosetae, distal process with microsetae. Epiproct ( Fig. 102 View FIGURES 97–102 ) elongate, triangular, rounded distally, with three macrosetae mesally, four distal macrosetae and abundant medium sized setae distally, as illustrated. Paraprocts ( Fig. 102 View FIGURES 97–102 ) triangular, with setae as illustrated, sensory fields with 18 trichobothria on basal rosettes.
Measurements. FW: 2400, HW: 1830, F: 525, T: 925, t1: 350, t2+3: 100, ctt1: 20, f1: 325, f2: 262, f3: 157, Mx4: 160, IO: 260, D: 260, d: 165, IO/d: 1.57; PO: 0.64.
Specimens studied. Holotype male. COLOMBIA. Putumayo. Puerto Leguizamo. Resguardo Tukunare, buffer area of the National Natural Park La Paya , 0°07’24.65’’N : 74°55’38.11’’W, 189 m., 9–10.II.2016. J. Panche. Led light trap on forest canopy. MUSENUV slide code 2898. Paratypes: 3 males, 3 females, same data as the holotype, MUSENUV slide code 2899. GoogleMaps
Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the type locality, the Resguardo Indigena Tukunare, in La Paya (Puerto Leguizamo, Putumayo).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Psocomorpha |
Family |
|
Genus |