Myrmecaelurus, A.Costa, 1855
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26515/rzsi/v119/i4/2019/145451 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F3154A2E-FFAB-FF91-FF57-FC6AF5083E43 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Myrmecaelurus |
status |
|
Genus Myrmecaelurus View in CoL Costa, 1855 belongs to tribe Myrmecaelurini of family Myrmeleontidae and is represented by four species namely Myrmecaelurus acerbus ( Walker, 1853) , Myrmecaelurus afghanus Kimmins, 1950 , Myrmecaelurus implexus ( Walker, 1853) and Myrmecaelurus zigan Aspöck, H. et al., 1980 in the Indian subcontinent ( Chandra & Sharma, 2009; Oswald, 2019). In general, Myrmecaelurus larvae are facultative pit-builders, performing both characters of pit-builders and non-pit-builders (Devetak et al., 2013) whereas the adults like other Myrmeleontids, could be encountered in vegetation during early morning or in dusk.
M. acerbus View in CoL is the most common species found in India. This species was described by Walker in 1853, under genus Myrmeleon Linnaeus View in CoL from North India without mentioning any type locality. However, MacLachlan (1868) included this under the genus Myrmecaelurus View in CoL . According to Krivokhatsky et al. (2015) M. acerbus View in CoL is a variable species which varies in size and is polymorphous in the intensity of the mottling of the wing venation even within local population. They synonymized variable forms of this species viz., M. varians Navás 1913 View in CoL , M. aequans Navás, 1913 View in CoL and M. nematicus Navás, 1932 View in CoL with M. acerbus View in CoL . This species has been reported from various localities in India i.e. Bihar, Punjab and Western Himalayas ( Needham, 1909) and different parts of Rajasthan ( Ghosh, 1977).
Although many workers ( Walker, 1853; Navás, 1913; Esben-Petersen, 1918 -19; Asana & Makino, 1937; Holzel, 1968) have dealt with this species, the present manuscript provides for the first time, a detailed description of both male and female genitalia based on scanning electron microscopic studies. The different types of the sensilla and their possible role have been discussed.
Material and Methods
The adult specimens were collected from different localities of Rajasthan as a part of studies on faunal diversity of Rajasthan Survey programme of ZSI.
The field collected specimens were separated up to species level with the help of keys by Ghosh (2000). The terminology of various structures has been adopted from Badano et al. (2017) and Nowińska and Brożek (2017). The morphology of male and female genitalia was studied under stereoscopic microscope as well as Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). For the preparation of male and female genitalia, the terminal abdominal segments were removed and put in 10% KOH solution overnight. These were then washed in water and kept in solution of 80% alcohol with a drop of glycerol for observation. They were then either processed for SEM or photography under microscope.
Samples used for SEM were dehydrated in graded series of alcohol and mounted on SEM specimen stubs using a small strip of double-sided adhesive tape. They were then sputter coated with gold and scanned under Zeiss EVO 18 special edition.
Photographs were taken under a stereoscopic zoom microscope Leica M250A with a mounted digital camera Leica DFC 500 and processed with LAS v3.7 software. Finally photographic plates were prepared in Adobe© Photoshop© 10.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Myrmecaelurus
Kaur, Simarjit, Rajmohana, K. & Pandher, Manpreet Singh 2019 |
M. nematicus Navás, 1932
Navas 1932 |
M. varians Navás 1913
Navas 1913 |
M. aequans Navás, 1913
Navas 1913 |
Myrmecaelurus
A.Costa 1855 |
Myrmeleon
Linnaeus 1767 |