Microplitis Foerster , 1862
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.31720 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:98CBB907-5B6C-4C27-AF84-3C6D4018B299 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F2E8BDD5-E3F2-6ABE-841B-CF3773F90383 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Microplitis Foerster , 1862 |
status |
|
Microplitis Foerster, 1862 View in CoL View at ENA
Microplitis Förster, 1862: 245 [type species, by original designation, Microgaster sordipes Nees ab Esenbeck, 1834.] Nixon 1970: 3. Mason 1981: 132. Austin and Dangerfield 1992 [see Shenefelt (1973: 737) for complete bibliography].
Dapsilotoma Cameron, 1906: 101 [type species, by monotypy, Dapsilotoma testaceipes Cameron, 1906]. Synonymized by Viereck (1914: 25).
Glabromicroplitis Papp, 1979: 176 [type species, Glabromicroplitis mahunkai Papp, 1979]. Synonymized by Austin and Dangerfield (1992).
Diagnosis.
Hypopygium usually small, never bearing longitudinal creases along median line. Ovipositor and sheaths usually projecting only a little beyond apex of hypopygium; sheaths bearing a few setae distally. T1 variable from wide to narrow apically and usually moderately sculptured; T2 rarely weakly sculptured and often with a weakly delimited trapezoidal median area; T3 longer than T2, the transverse groove between them poor; remaining tergites nearly smooth. Propodeum usually convexly rounded and often with a distinct percurrent medial keel, never with an areola, surface almost completely rugose, sometimes reticulo-rugose. Mesoscutum often densely sculptured, sometimes smooth, and with notauli, sometimes strongly defined. Posterior band of scutellum usually smooth but interrupted medially by rugosity. Fore wing usually with a D-shaped areolet, shape variable in some species, subtriangular, rectangular, etc.; 1CU1 much shorter than 2CU1; r short. Hind wing with vannal lobe convex and fringed throughout. Hind coxa small and not longer than T1; hind spurs shorter than half length of basitarsus. Labial palpi 3-jointed, sometimes 4-jointed.
Generally, the genus are clearly distinct from other genera. A detailed description of the genus and references to the revised generic diagnosis and Oriental Microplitis species can be made using the most recent data ( Mason 1981; Austin and Dangerfield 1993; Ranjith et al. 2015).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |