Leptoplax (Carpenter MS) Dall, 1882
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.35885/ruthenica.2024.34(1).2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:719C4B3B-9EEE-4A69-B694-4695F150D8FA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11088489 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F260B143-BB29-592D-C682-FC9CFDD751A5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Leptoplax (Carpenter MS) Dall, 1882 |
status |
|
Genus Leptoplax (Carpenter MS) Dall, 1882 View in CoL
Type species. Chiton coarctatus Sowerby, 1841 View in CoL , by monotypy.
Genus distribution. Western Pacific: Japan, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, New Caledonia, South Australia and Spratly Islands now.
Remarks. For a long time the genus Leptoplax was considered synonymous with the genus Notoplax . Finally, Gowlett-Holmes [2001] restored its generic status, although she did not provide a diagnosis. Sirenko and Saito [2017] presented a diagnosis of the genus. Here I give a somewhat refined distinction of Leptoplax from Notoplax .
The main characters of Leptoplax distinguishing it from Notoplax are: 1) absence of diagonal line on tegmentum of intermediate valves, running from lateral incision to apex and decorated with large pustules; 2) presence of ribs on ventral flattened spicules and more often on dorsal spicules and needles; 3) absence of asymmetry of central and first lateral teeth of radula.
In the new species, the anterior margin of the apophyses of the tail valve is not concave, so I remove this feature noted in Sirenko and Saito [2017] from the diagnosis of Leptoplax .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |