Eusparassus pearsoni ( Pocock, 1901 ) Moradmand & Jäger, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2012.707249 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6501790 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F21C790B-2363-3A66-8718-BE89842E9E66 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eusparassus pearsoni ( Pocock, 1901 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Eusparassus pearsoni ( Pocock, 1901) View in CoL comb. nov. stat. nov.
( Figure 22 View Figure 22 )
Sparassus pearsoni Pocock, 1901: 492–493 (description of female; syntypes examined, lectotype and paralectotypes designated) [see notes below].
Olios xerxes – Gravely 1931: 240–241 (in part, misidentification and unjustified synonymy); Sethi and Tikader 1988: 35 (in part, misidentification).
Type material
Lectotype: female, INDIA: Poona, Ghats, Madan leg. ( NHM 99.11.2.177.199) ; Paralectotypes: INDIA: 13 ♀♀ and 30 juveniles, same data as for lectotype ( NHM 99.11.2.177.199) ; 3 ♀♀, with label “ Sparassus pearsoni Poc. East Khandesh , R. Pearson coll. Robt. Wroughton (p.)” ( NHM 99.9.21.5.24.525) ; 33 ♀♀, with label: “ Poona Dist. , Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. / Poona Dist” ( NHM 1899.9.21.526-546) ; 85 ♀♀ and several immatures, with label “ Sparassus pearsoni Poc. Pimparner (W. Khandesh) , R. Pearson coll. Robt. Wroughton (p.)” ( NHM) .
Note. Among this relatively huge number of syntypes, we found several immature specimens of Olios sp. and Eusparassus sp. Hence, to maintain the status and verify the identity of the species, an adult female is designated as lectotype from Poona, Ghats in India.
Diagnosis
Eusparassus pearsoni comb. nov. can easily be distinguished from remaining species by its peculiar MS of epigyne heart-shaped and fully hardened and sclerotized ( Figure 22A,E View Figure 22 ).
Redescription
Female (n = 135). Total length: 16–21, prosoma length 7.5–9.4, prosoma width 6.4–8.2, anterior width of prosoma 4.0–5.2, opisthosoma length 8.5–11.6, opisthosoma width 5.2–6.8. Eyes of lectotype, eye diameters: AME 0.62, ALE 0.45, PME 0.38, PLE 0.44; eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.30, AME–ALE 0.15, PME–PME 0.68, PME–PLE 0.75, AME–PME 0.48, ALE–PLE 0.32, clypeus height at AME 0.53, clypeus height at ALE 0.61 ( Figure 22C View Figure 22 ).
Chelicera with two anterior and three or four posterior teeth; cheliceral furrow without denticles; three bristles at distal end of cheliceral basal segment ( Figure 22D View Figure 22 ). Leg formula: 2 4 1 3. Measurements of palp and legs (lectotype): Palp 10.4 [3.3, 1.5, 2.0, 3.6], I 30.1 [8.8, 4.3, 7.2, 7.8, 2.0], II 32.5 [9.8, 4.2, 8.0, 8.3, 2.2], III 29.0 [9.1, 4.0, 6.8, 7.1, 2.0], IV 31.5 [9.6, 3.7, 7.7, 8.4, 2.1].
Spination. Palp 131, 001, 1111, 1013; Legs: Femur I–III 323, IV 322; Patella I–IV 000 / 001; Tibia I–IV 0024 / 2024; Metatarsus I–III 2024, IV 3036.
Epigyne / vulva. As in diagnosis with MS enlarged, EF quadrate in shape; EFb combined with AMLL; AMLL are not fused but continued into hardened MS ( Figure 22A, E View Figure 22 ); vulva with glandular pores located at tip of glandular process ( Figure 22F View Figure 22 ).
Male. Unknown.
Colouration [in ethanol]. Reddish brown with dark patches on prosoma, grey opisthosoma, ventral opisthosoma pale.
Remarks
Gravely (1931) erroneously synonymized E. pearsoni comb. nov. along with E. maynardi with E. xerxes , despite noting the peculiar differences in the epigyne of E. pearsoni , which is noticeably distinguishable from E. xerxes Pocock (1901) , in “the Fauna of India series”, did not include illustrations to his description of all his new species. Later, Gravely (1931) only provided drawings of E. xerxes . Consequently, drawings of E. pearsoni (as well as E. maynardi ) have never appeared in publications before and are presented here for the first time.
Known geographical distribution
Known only from the type localities including Khandesh, Ghats and Poona (=Pune) in Indian Peninsula.
NHM |
University of Nottingham |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eusparassus pearsoni ( Pocock, 1901 )
Moradmand, Majid & Jäger, Peter 2012 |
Olios xerxes
Sethi VD & Tikader BK 1988: 35 |
Gravely FH 1931: 240 |
Sparassus pearsoni
Pocock RI 1901: 493 |