Chasmocarcinus hirsutipes Coelho & Coelho, 1998
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4209.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:849BAB5C-464A-4B4A-A586-5742411EDC01 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617064 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F16BFB33-FFB7-FFEE-FF6A-FB25FBF2FEDD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chasmocarcinus hirsutipes Coelho & Coelho, 1998 |
status |
|
Chasmocarcinus hirsutipes Coelho & Coelho, 1998 View in CoL
( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 G; 21H; 29B; 36C, D; 49H; 65I)
Chasmocarcinus View in CoL sp. C.— Coelho et al. 1980: 39, table III, appendix II [in list].— Barreto et al. 1993: 651 [in list]. Chasmocarcinus hirsutipes Coelho & Coelho, 1998: 804 View in CoL , 813, figs. 5‒7 [type localilty: Brazil, Pará].— Coelho et al. 2008: 12 [in list].— Ng et al. 2008: 76 [in list].
Type material (not examined). Holotype male (DOUFPE 521); Brazil, Pará, Almirante Saldanha , stn 2476, 01°11’N, 47°05.5'W, 44 m. GoogleMaps
Paratypes: 2 males (MZUSP 13607, ex-DOUFPE 514; see Melo et al. 2003: 431), Proj. Geomar, stn 46, 01°05’N, 47°42.4'W; specimens of unknown sex (DOUFPE 517, DOUFPE 518, DOUFPE 519).
Diagnosis. Anterolateral margins of carapace ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 G; Coelho & Coelho 1998: fig. 5a, b) with low granular ridge, setose dorsal surface. Orbits short, proportionally short eye peduncles ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 H; Coelho & Coelho 1998: fig. 5c, d). Antennular articles relatively short ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 H). Third maxilliped ( Fig. 29 View FIGURE 29 B; Coelho & Coelho 1998: fig. 6e) ischium elongated, about same size as elongated merus. Bulging pterygostomial region, clearly visible from dorsal view. Fingers of major chela of holotype male ( Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 C; Coelho & Coelho 1998: fig. 6d, e) setose, proportionally short, slightly shorter than propodus in dorsal view; pollex as long as dactylus. Fingers of minor chela of holotype male ( Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 D; Coelho & Coelho 1998: fig. 6f) scissor-like; with small, sharp teeth. Inner margin of cheliped carpus with tooth ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 G; Coelho & Coelho 1998: fig. 5a). Ambulatory legs ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 G; Coelho & Coelho 1998: fig. 5a) setose, proportionally short; no subdistal spur on P5 dactylus. Fused thoracic sternites 1, 2 (Coelho & Coelho 1998: fig. 7a) broadly triangular, proportionally narrow, short. Male pleon ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 H; Coelho & Coelho 1998: fig. 7c) with proportionally long, narrow telson, nearly triangular in shape. G1 slightly slender, narrow at base, distal segment with spinules ( Fig. 65 View FIGURE 65 I; Coelho & Coelho 1998: fig. 7d). G2, female pleon, thorax, vulvae undescribed.
Remarks. Although no material of this species was examined, the description of the species by Coelho & Coelho (1998) leaves little doubt that it is indeed a separate species on account of its setose carapace and pereiopods and tooth on the inner margin of cheliped merus ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 G; Coelho & Coelho 1998: fig. 5).
Distribution. Brazil (Amapá, Pará). Depth: 24‒77 m (Coelho & Coelho 1998).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chasmocarcinus hirsutipes Coelho & Coelho, 1998
Ng, Peter K. L. & Castro, Peter 2016 |
Chasmocarcinus hirsutipes
Coelho & Coelho 1998: 804 |