Stenodema virens (Linnaeus, 1767)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1209.124766 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:069B4575-16D4-4EC4-804D-AB4618C9AB43 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13312362 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F03A6315-1EBE-5BD0-AD9F-2283DEBBE124 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Stenodema virens (Linnaeus, 1767) |
status |
|
Stenodema virens (Linnaeus, 1767) View in CoL
Figs 1 J, P View Figure 1 , 2 B View Figure 2 , 5 E – H, R, V View Figure 5 , 7 G – I View Figure 7 , 10 C, D View Figure 10 , 11 E – G View Figure 11
Cimex virens Linnaeus, 1767: 730 (original description).
Stenodema virens Reuter, 1904: 4 (comb. nov., key to species); Carvalho 1959: 307 (catalogue); Kerzhner and Jaczewski 1964: 958 (key to species); Wagner and Weber 1964: 94 (key to species); Wagner 1974: 112 (key to species); Muminov 1989: 127 (key to species); Vinokurov and Kanyukova 1995: 98 (key to species); Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 196 (catalogue). 7 View in CoL
Diagnosis.
Body length in male 6.0–6.6, in female 6.1–7.1; frons protruding above clypeus base (as in Fig. 1 C View Figure 1 ); labium reaching middle coxa, but not surpassing it (as in Fig. 1 N View Figure 1 ); hind femur distinctly tapering towards apex, without spines (Fig. 2 B View Figure 2 ), 6–8 × as long as wide; hind tibia curved basally (as in Fig. 2 I View Figure 2 ); swelling on propleura curved (as in Fig. 1 H View Figure 1 ); antennal segment I length / head width ratio in male 1.0, in female 0.8–1.0; antennal segment I / pronotum length ratio 0.6–0.7 in male, 0.6–0.8 in female; antennal segment I not widened basally, its setae at base as dense as on other parts of this segment; setae in antennal segment I simple; antennal segment II length / head width ratio in male 2.4–2.6; groove on posterior part of mesopleuron absent (as in Fig. 1 M View Figure 1 ); paired pits between calli absent (as in Fig. 1 G View Figure 1 ); setae on posterior margin of hind femur denser than on other parts of femur, shorter than half of hind femur width (Fig. 2 B View Figure 2 ); genital capsule only slightly longer than wide, acute apically, with outgrowth near left paramere socket (Fig. 5 R View Figure 5 ); right paramere ~ 4 × as long as wide, its apical part as wide as basal part, apical process bifurcate (Fig. 5 E, G View Figure 5 ); right paramere with apical process acute in posterior view (Fig. 5 Р), its sensory lobe swollen (Fig. 5 F View Figure 5 ); vesica with four membranous lobes (Fig. 7 G – I View Figure 7 ); membranous swelling on dorsal labiate plate not covering sclerotized rings (Fig. 10 C View Figure 10 ); posterior wall with dorsal structure and sigmoid process between interramal lobes, dorsal structure rounded (Fig. 10 D View Figure 10 ).
Distribution.
Stenodema virens is widely distributed in Europe, the Near East, and the Caucasus, extending eastwards to Yakutia, Buryatia, Mongolia, and northern China ( Kerzhner and Josifov 1999).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Stenodema virens (Linnaeus, 1767)
Namyatova, Anna A., Dzhelali, Polina A. & Konstantinov, Fedor V. 2024 |
Stenodema virens
Kerzhner IM & Josifov M 1999: 196 |
Vinokurov NN & Kanyukova EV 1995: 98 |
Muminov NN 1989: 127 |
Wagner E 1974: 112 |
Kerzhner IM & Jaczewski TL 1964: 958 |
Wagner E & Weber HH 1964: 94 |
Carvalho JCM 1959: 307 |
Reuter OM 1904: 4 |
Cimex virens
Cimex virens Linnaeus, 1767: 730 (original description). |