Cybaeus devius Chamberlin and Ivie
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5026.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:511C28F6-07E4-412C-B83E-91D2CAC5AA27 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5307726 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE3CB72D-FF99-FFA8-BEA9-A6343FFDE264 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cybaeus devius Chamberlin and Ivie |
status |
|
Cybaeus devius Chamberlin and Ivie View in CoL
Figs 14–16 View FIGURES 14–19 , 32 View FIGURE 32
Cybaeus devius Chamberlin and Ivie 1942: 18 View in CoL , fig. 48. Roewer 1954: 90. Roth and Brown 1986: 3. Bennett in Copley et al. 2009: 373, fig. 9. World Spider Catalog 2021.
Type material examined. U.S.A.: California: Holotype female. Madera County, North Fork , 37°15'N / 119°30'W, no date, no collector ( AMNH). GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. The male of C. devius is unknown. The female of C. devius is only likely to be confused with the females of C. echo spec. nov. or C. wilsonia spec. nov. with which it shares very short spermathecal stalks and the unique copulatory duct morphology of a heavily sclerotized apical section of each copulatory duct enveloped by a very lightly sclerotized, almost diaphanous, basal section ( Figs 15–16, 18–19 View FIGURES 14–19 , 21–22 View FIGURES 20–22 ). In the female of C. devius ( Figs 15–16 View FIGURES 14–19 ) the basal section of each copulatory duct is voluminous, makes three loops around the more heavily sclerotized apical section, and occupies a greater area than (and, in ventral view, partially obscures) each relatively small spermathecal base. In the female of C. wilsonia spec. nov. ( Figs 18–19 View FIGURES 14–19 ) the basal section of each copulatory duct is also voluminous but is looped only twice around the apical section. In the female of C. echo spec. nov. ( Figs 21–22 View FIGURES 20–22 ) the basal section of each copulatory duct loops three times around the apical section but is not voluminous (the basal and apical sections are of similar diameter) and occupies a much smaller area. Furthermore, the spermathecal bases are large and unobscured in females of C. echo spec. nov. ( Figs 21–22 View FIGURES 20–22 ) and C. wilsonia spec. nov. ( Figs 18–19 View FIGURES 14–19 ) bases. Finally, the basal section of each copulatory duct in C. devius travels from the atrium to the anterior margin of the vulva before beginning to loop around the apical section ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14–19 ) (versus travelling only partway to the anterior margin before looping in C echo spec. nov. [ Fig. 21 View FIGURES 20–22 ] and C. wilsonia spec. nov. [ Fig. 18 View FIGURES 14–19 ]).
Description. Ventral tibia I macrosetae 2-1p-2-1p-0.
Female: (n=1). Atrium ( Figs 14–15 View FIGURES 14–19 ) very small, about 1/4 width of vulva. Spermathecal heads apparently protruding dorsally from vulval ducts from within region enclosed by copulatory ducts ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 14–19 ).
Measurements (n=1). CL 2.11, CW 1.44, SL 1.04, SW 1.01.
Note: Cybaeus echo spec. nov. and perhaps C. wilsonia spec. nov. may be synonyms of C. devius . Insufficient specimens are available to make a strongly supported conclusion of conspecificity.
Although its coloration indicates the single specimen of C. echo is fully matured the vulva at least appears to be teneral with thin-walled ducts and weakly developed Bennett’s glands. Likewise the three known females of C. wilsonia all have apparently teneral vulvae. Clearly more specimens (especially males) from across the entire Sierra Nevada range of these three putative species need to be examined to analyze variation. At this time we consider the specimens examined here to be sufficiently distinct to warrant the recognition of three separate species.
Distribution. ( Fig. 32 View FIGURE 32 ). Known only from the type locality in Madera County on the western slopes of the central Sierra Nevada.
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.