Cybaeus piazzai Bennett, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5026.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:511C28F6-07E4-412C-B83E-91D2CAC5AA27 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5307734 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE3CB72D-FF91-FFBE-BEA9-A5843C18E304 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cybaeus piazzai Bennett |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cybaeus piazzai Bennett View in CoL spec. nov.
Figs 39–45 View FIGURES 39–41 View FIGURES 42–45 , 59 View FIGURES 59–61 , 62 View FIGURE 62
Type material. U.S.A.: California: Holotype male. Santa Barbara County, grounds of Santa Barbara Natural History Museum , 7.ii.1967, V.D. Roth ( CAS) . Paratypes. Ventura. 1♀, “N34 W119” no date, no collector, ( AMNH) ; Santa Barbara. 1♀, N end of Lk. Cachuma, 8.ii.1967, V.D. Roth ( CAS) ; 1♂ 7♀, grounds of Santa Barbara Natural History Museum , 7.ii.1967, V.D. Roth ( CAS) .
Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronym honouring the prominent Los Angeles area blues harmonicist Rod Piazza.
Diagnosis. The male of C. piazzai spec. nov. is distinguished by the form of the distal and proximal arms of the tegular apophysis; the female by the form of the copulatory ducts ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 42–45 ). The males of C. tardatus and C. piazzai spec. nov. ( Figs 40 View FIGURES 39–41 , 59 View FIGURES 59–61 ) are distinguished by the concave distal prolateral margin of the elongate distal arm of the tegular apophysis ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 39–41 ) and the acuminate ventral and dorsal tips of the proximal arm of the tegular apophysis ( Figs 40 View FIGURES 39–41 , 59 View FIGURES 59–61 ) in C. piazzai spec. nov. (versus a short, broad, and angular distal arm [ Fig. 48 View FIGURES 46–49 ] and the rounded ventral tip and acuminate dorsal tip of the proximal arm [ Figs 48 View FIGURES 46–49 , 60 View FIGURES 59–61 ] in C. tardatus ). The males of C. topanga spec. nov. and C. piazzai spec. nov. can be distinguished by the ventral and dorsal tips of the proximal arm of the tegular apophysis being approximately at right angles to each other with the dorsal tip about twice as long as the ventral tip ( Figs 40 View FIGURES 39–41 , 59 View FIGURES 59–61 ) in C. piazzai spec. nov. (versus the ventral and dorsal tips are oriented in the same direction and of similar lengths ( Figs 57 View FIGURES 55–58 , 61 View FIGURES 59–61 ) in C. topanga spec. nov.). Furthermore, the dorsal tip of the proximal arm is sharply acuminate in C. piazzai spec. nov. (versus bluntly acuminate in the male of C. topanga spec. nov.). This difference can be difficult to resolve, however, because of the small size of these structures.
Distinguishing the females of C. piazzai spec. nov. and C. orarius spec. nov. is discussed under the diagnosis of the latter species. From the other females in the tardatus species group with rounded spermathecal bases ( C. tardatus and C. topanga spec. nov.) the female of C. piazzai spec. nov. is distinguished by the posteriorly broadened copulatory ducts which obscure the Bennett’s glands in cleared dorsal view of the vulva ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 42–45 ) (versus copulatory ducts of similar narrow diameter throughout their length and not obscuring the Bennett’s glands in dorsal view in C. tardatus [ Fig. 51 View FIGURES 50–54 ] and C. topanga spec. nov. [ Fig. 54 View FIGURES 50–54 ]).
Description. Ventral tibia I macrosetae variable: 2-1p-2-1p-1p(or 2 or 0). Femora and tibiae lightly banded or not (larger individuals are more likely to have banded legs than are smaller specimens).
Male: (n=2). About 30–35 peg setae on anteriorly directed patellar apophysis ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 39–41 ). Carinate retrolateral tibial apophysis nearly as long as tibia. Distal arm of tegular apophysis ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 39–41 ) very broad, elongate; proximal arm ( Figs 40 View FIGURES 39–41 , 59 View FIGURES 59–61 ) appearing trifid in ventral view with ventral tip triangular, bluntly acuminate, prolaterally directed; dorsal tip triangular, sharply pointed, basally directed.
Measurements (n=2). CL 2.7, 2.9; CW 1.98, 2.10; SL 1.30, 1.33; SW 1.23, 1.33. Holotype larger specimen.
Female: (n=9). Atrium ( Figs 42, 44 View FIGURES 42–45 ) slightly hooded anteriorly with area between atrial openings inverted vase-shaped, widest posteriorly, concave. Copulatory ducts ( Figs 42–45 View FIGURES 42–45 ) opening into atrium laterally from vulva, contiguous or separated anteriorly, gradually broadening posteriorly, turning anteriorly and narrowing at posterior margin of vulva. Spermathecal heads small dorsal lobes medially on vulva, visible in dorsal view. Stalks narrow, relatively long. Bennett’s glands located dorsolaterally on small, rounded bases.
Measurements (n=9). CL 2.13–3.4 (2.6+0.4), CW 1.40–2.30 (1.80+0.30), SL 1.04–1.55 (1.26+0.17), SW 0.99– 1.45 (1.20+0.16).
Distribution and natural history. ( Fig. 62 View FIGURE 62 ). Known only from Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties, California. The two males were collected in February.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.