Conus (Lautoconus), 1923
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.816.1747 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C150007D-80F9-4C34-9F85-BDB1211B244D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6491244 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE28878C-DD11-5A3F-FD3D-FE80CF41C644 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Conus (Lautoconus) |
status |
|
Conus (Lautoconus) sp. 3
Figs 10 View Fig , 20 View Fig , 40E View Fig ; Table 5 View Table 5
Conus (Chelyconus) clavatulus View in CoL – Caze 2010: fig. 33f (non Conus clavatulus d’Orbigny, 1852) .
Material examined
GREECE – Crete • 1 spec.; Voleones; Tortonian; 1990; Didier Merle leg.; Action spécifique du Muséum project (1989–1990) exped.; MNHN.F.A30844 • 1 spec.; Action spécifique du Muséum project (1989– 1990) exped.; MNHN.F.A83012 .
Shell description
Large (estimated SL: 172.7 mm), elongate, sturdy shell. Spire whorl outline conical. Early spire whorls conical, later spire whorls conical, with slightly convex outline. Shoulder rounded, with maximum diameter just below shoulder. Suture slightly impressed. Subsutural flexure very shallow, very weakly curved, nearly symmetrical ( Fig. 40E View Fig ). Last whorl elongated, straight. Aperture straight. Apertural canal short, wide, fasciole twisted.
Colour pattern variation
Three levels of colouration are present in this species. The first one consists of two fluorescent bands, which are on the middle and anterior parts of the shell. The second one is a pattern of spirally arranged alterations of non-fluorescent and fluorescent dots. The third level is displayed between the spiral alterations of dots. It consists of a series of fluorescent, arrow-like blotches-tents, pointing in the opposite direction of the shell growth, alternated by non-fluorescent areas. The non-fluorescent areas might have one or two dots between the fluorescent arrows. Along with the second level of fluorescent dots, irregular fluorescent flammulae appear on the spire whorls.
Remarks
The colour pattern of the species is unique in the studied material.The relatively rounded spire whorls and the lack of tubercles on early spire whorls allow us to categorize it as an elongated Conus (Lautoconus) . Caze (2010) identified this specimen (MNHN.F.A30844) ( Fig. 10 View Fig ) as Conus (Chelyconus) clavatulus d’Orbigny, 1852 , originally described from the early Miocene of Saubrigues ( France). Hall (1966: pl. 23 figs 23–24) illustrated the type material (a syntype from the early Miocene of “Dax-Saubrigues”, Aquitaine) of Conus clavatulus from the collection of Grateloup. The shell of this specimen resembles Conus (Lautoconus) sp. 3. Conus subclavatus d’Orbigny, 1852 , another species of the early Miocene of the Aquitaine Basin, is known from a syntype (MNHN.F. A13055 View Materials ) of the d’Orbigny’s collection and is rather similar to Conus clavatulus . Since the patterns of both species remain unknown, we refrain from attributing the Cretan specimens to one of these species. Additionally, C. ( Lautoconus ) sp. 3 differs from the figured specimens of Kovács & Vicián (2013) from the Langhian of Hungary, named Varioconus clavatulus (d’Orbigny, 1852) , in the higher spire and the more angulated shoulder. Finally, this species is not Conus (Lautoconus) ponderosus Brocchi, 1814 as it has a slightly higher spire and more elongate last whorl.
Stratigraphic range
Tortonian of Greece (Voleones, Apostoli Basin, Crete).
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Conoidea |
Family |
|
Genus |
Conus (Lautoconus)
Psarras, Christos, Merle, Didier & Koskeridou, Efterpi 2022 |
Conus (Chelyconus) clavatulus
Caze 2010: 20 |